切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 633 -637. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.06.012

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术联合围手术期康复训练对成人腹壁疝患者术后胃肠功能恢复及复发的影响
彭素华1,(), 高显平1, 李静1, 孙钢2   
  1. 1. 101400 北京怀柔医院康复科
    2. 101400 北京怀柔医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-01 出版日期:2020-12-20
  • 通信作者: 彭素华
  • 基金资助:
    北京市科技计划委员会专项(0102583Y)

Effect of laparoscopic abdominal wall hernia repair combined with perioperative rehabilitation training on postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery and recurrence in adult patients with abdominal wall hernia

Suhua Peng1,(), Xianping Gao1, Jing Li1, Gang Sun2   

  1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Beijing Huairou Hospital, Beijing100000, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Huairou Hospital, Beijing100000, China
  • Received:2019-12-01 Published:2020-12-20
  • Corresponding author: Suhua Peng
引用本文:

彭素华, 高显平, 李静, 孙钢. 腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术联合围手术期康复训练对成人腹壁疝患者术后胃肠功能恢复及复发的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 633-637.

Suhua Peng, Xianping Gao, Jing Li, Gang Sun. Effect of laparoscopic abdominal wall hernia repair combined with perioperative rehabilitation training on postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery and recurrence in adult patients with abdominal wall hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(06): 633-637.

目的

探讨腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术联合围手术期康复训练对成人腹壁疝患者术后胃肠功能恢复及复发的影响。

方法

分析2016年2月至2018年12月在北京怀柔医院就诊的80例腹壁疝患者,根据患者所采取的手术方法分为对照组和观察组,各40例。2组均采用腹腔镜内补片植入术,观察组无康复介入,治疗组采用术前1周、术后3周的康复训练,训练内容包括腹式呼吸训练、腹内外斜肌、腹横肌、多裂肌、盆底肌等核心肌群激活训练。记录手术相关指标及胃肠功能恢复指标;检测并比较2组治疗前后血清白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)水平;统计术中及术后并发症;随访1年,观察疝复发率。

结果

相较于对照组,观察组术后疼痛时间和下床活动时间均缩短(P<0.05),手术时间和术中出血量无明显差异(P>0.05);观察组术后首次肠鸣音时间、肛门排气时间和首次排便时间均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);术后2组IL-6和CRP水平均高于术前(P<0.05),但观察组IL-6和CRP水平低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组尿潴留发生率低于对照组(P<0.05),2组患者的术中出血、肠管损伤、血清肿、慢性疼痛、复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术联合围手术期康复训练可促进成人腹壁疝患者术后胃肠功能恢复,降低机体炎性反应,且安全性高,降低术后复发率,具有较好的临床推广应用价值。

Objective

To investigate the effect of laparoscopic abdominal wall hernia repair combined with perioperative rehabilitation training on the postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery and recurrence in adult patients with abdominal wall hernia.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 80 patients with abdominal wall hernia treated in Beijing Huairou hospital from February 2016 to December 2018 was divided into the control group and the observation group, with 40 cases in each group. Both groups were treated with intraperitoneal onlay mesh, and the control group was treated without perioperative rehabilitation training. The observation group received rehabilitation training on 1 week before and 3 weeks after the operation. The training included abdominal breathing training, and core muscles activation training (internal and external oblique muscles, transverse abdominis, multifidus muscle and pelvic floor muscle). Surgery-related indicators and gastrointestinal function recovery indicators were recorded, and serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were detected and compared between the two groups before and after treatment. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were followed. The recurrence of hernia was observed after 1 year follow-up.

Results

The postoperative pain time and time to get out of bed in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). No difference of operation time and intraoperative blood loss was observed (P>0.05). The time of first bowel sounds, anal exhaust time, and time of first defecation in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of IL-6 and CRP in the two groups after the operation were higher than those before the operation (P<0.05), but the levels of IL-6 and CRP in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of urinary retention in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and there were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative bleeding, intestinal injury, seroma, chronic pain and recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic abdominal wall hernia repair combined with perioperative rehabilitation training can promote gastrointestinal function recovery in adult patients with abdominal wall hernia, reduce inflammatory reactions in the body, and has high safety and low postoperative recurrence rate. It has a good clinical promotion value.

表1 2组患者手术指标比较(±s
表2 2组患者术后胃肠功能比较(±s
表3 2组患者术前后白细胞介素-6和C反应蛋白水平比较(±s
表4 2组患者并发症和复发率比较[例(%)]
[1]
刘子文,张光永,李航宇, 等. 腹壁疝患者围手术期深静脉血栓形成的预防和治疗[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(11): 1083-1085.
[2]
贾珍,罗梦琳. 康艾注射液对直肠癌腹腔镜手术后胃肠功能恢复及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国临床研究, 2019, 32(3): 392-394.
[3]
中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 38(7): 704-706.
[4]
赵以林,罗爱林. 2018版美国麻醉医师协会适度镇静和镇痛指南解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(1): 24-28.
[5]
Shubinets V, Carney M J, Colen D L, et al. Management of Infected Mesh After Abdominal Hernia Repair: Systematic Review and Single-Institution Experience[J]. Ann plast surg, 2017, 80(2): 2356-2359.
[6]
Todros S, Pachera P, Baldan N, et al. Computational modeling of abdominal hernia laparoscopic repair with a surgical mesh[J]. Int J Comput Ass Rad Surg, 2017, 13(1): 1-9.
[7]
Singh K D, Singh V, Gupta P, et al. A rare case of bullhorn injury-associated traumatic hernia of anterior abdominal wall managed by laparoscopic sutured tissue-only repair[J]. J Postgrad Med, 2018, 64(1): 56-58.
[8]
戴国清. 完全腹膜外腹腔镜补片植入术治疗腹股沟复发疝临床疗效观察[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2015, 12(3): 239-241.
[9]
戴晓冬,黄鹤光,陈燕昌, 等. 腹腔镜联合开腹补片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(11): 1090-1093.
[10]
叶志宇,陈晓岗,吴菁. 生物补片在完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中应用效果观察[J]. 浙江医学, 2018, 17(9): 970-972.
[11]
章云飞,李长生,卢锡华, 等. 右美托咪啶复合丙泊酚或七氟烷全麻对胃肠肿瘤腹腔镜手术患者应激和术后恢复质量的影响[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(17): 1302-1306.
[12]
张君,高洁,高东. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术对患者胃肠功能与炎性指标的影响研究[J]. 贵州医药, 2019, 17(5): 722-723.
[13]
王劲,张隆陶. 腹壁疝修补术后并发症原因及防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013(4): 83-84.
[14]
李炳根,龚独辉,缪锦超, 等. 完全腔镜下腹直肌后修补术治疗中线腹壁疝的新尝试[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(36): 2933-2936.
[15]
刘晶,李宁,赵静. 早期护理干预在促进妇科腹部手术后患者胃肠道功能恢复中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2017, 23(4): 71-72.
[16]
张桂丽,姚丽文,张琪, 等. 穴位按压与收腹提肛锻炼对腹部手术后胃肠功能的影响[J]. 上海护理, 2014, 14(3): 13-15.
[1] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[2] 崔占斌, 乔军利, 张丽丽, 韩明强. 尿碘水平与甲状腺乳头状癌患者术后复发危险度分层的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 615-618.
[3] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[4] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[5] 罗辉, 熊珍珍, 黄令杰, 林山, 李金雨. 盆腔淋巴结大小对膀胱癌复发的影响[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 495-499.
[6] 孔博, 张璟, 吕珂. 超声技术在复杂腹壁疝诊治中的作用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[7] 张起尧, 刘子文. 复杂腹壁疝的解剖和生物力学基础[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-676.
[8] 邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚. 基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.
[9] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[10] 刘琪, 王殿琛, 符洋. 复杂腹壁疝诊疗问题与要点[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 504-508.
[11] 蒋正东, 李徐奇, 王曙逢, 魏光兵. 复发性腹股沟疝的腹腔镜手术策略及疗效观察[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 539-543.
[12] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[13] 叶文涛, 吴忠均, 廖锐. 癌旁组织ALOX15表达与肝癌根治性切除术后预后的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 708-712.
[14] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[15] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
阅读次数
全文


摘要