切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 150 -154. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.02.014

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

不同剂量右美托咪定滴鼻对七氟烷麻醉腹股沟疝患儿应激反应和苏醒期躁动的影响
江鹏1, 候芝绮1, 罗德兴1,()   
  1. 1. 516000 广东省,惠州市中心人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-18 出版日期:2020-04-18
  • 通信作者: 罗德兴

Effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine nasal drops on stress response and agitation during recovery in children with groin hernia under sevoflurane anesthesia

Peng Jiang1, Zhiqi Hou1, Dexing Luo1,()   

  1. 1. Huizhou Minicipal Central Hospital, Guangdong, Huizhou 516000, China
  • Received:2019-06-18 Published:2020-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Dexing Luo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Luo Dexing, Email:
引用本文:

江鹏, 候芝绮, 罗德兴. 不同剂量右美托咪定滴鼻对七氟烷麻醉腹股沟疝患儿应激反应和苏醒期躁动的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 150-154.

Peng Jiang, Zhiqi Hou, Dexing Luo. Effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine nasal drops on stress response and agitation during recovery in children with groin hernia under sevoflurane anesthesia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 150-154.

目的

分析不同剂量右美托咪定滴鼻对七氟烷麻醉腹股沟疝患儿应激反应和苏醒期躁动的影响。

方法

选择2015年1月至2018年12月在惠州市中心人民医院175例腹股沟疝患儿的临床资料,按简单随机抽样分为A组(57例)、B组(61例)、C组(57例),分别予以1.0、1.5、2.0 μg/kg右美托咪定滴鼻,比较各组患儿苏醒时间、不同时间点血流动力学指标、应激反应指标、躁动评分、躁动发生率及其他不良反应发生情况。

结果

A组苏醒时间少于B组及C组,且B组苏醒时间少于C组(P<0.05)。手术开始即刻、拔喉罩即刻3组心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)均较滴鼻前上升,A组HR、MAP高于B组及C组(P<0.05),手术开始即刻,3组应激反应指标均较术前上升,且A组高于B组及C组(P<0.05),B组HR、MAP、应激反应指标与C组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。苏醒即刻、苏醒后5 min及苏醒后15 min A组躁动评分均高于B组及C组(P<0.05),B组和C组躁动评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组躁动、呛咳发生率高于B组及C组,A、B组恶心、呕吐发生率低于C组(P<0.05)。

结论

1.5 μg/kg右美托咪定滴鼻更适合小儿七氟烷麻醉腹股沟疝手术,可维持血流动力学的稳定,减轻应激反应和苏醒期躁动,且不增加药物不良反应的发生率。

Objective

To analyze the effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine nasal drops on stress response and agitation in recovery period in children with hernia under sevoflurane anesthesia.

Methods

175 cases of pediatric hernia were divided into group A (n=57), group B (n=61) and group C (n=57) according to simple random method, and 1.0 μg/kg, 1.5 μg/kg and 2.0 μg/kg dexmedetomidine were given nasal drops, respectively. The recovery time, hemodynamics, stress response index, agitation score at different time points, incidence rate of agitation and other adverse reactions in each group were compared.

Results

The awakening time of group A was lesser than that of group B and group C, and the awakening time of group B was lesser than that of group C (P<0.05). The heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) of the three groups increased immediately after surgery and immediately after removal of the laryngeal mask compared with that before nasal drops. The HR and MAP of group A were higher than those of group B and group C (P<0.05), immediately after the operation, the indicators of stress response in all three groups were increased compared with that before the operation, and group A was higher than group B and group C (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in HR, MAP and stress response index between group B and group C (P>0.05). Immediately after awakening, at 5 min after awakening and 15 min after awakening, the agitation score of group A were higher than those of group B and group C (P<0.05), and there was no statistical significance between group B and group C (P>0.05). The incidence of agitation and cough in group A was higher than that in group B and group C, while the incidence of nausea and vomiting in groups A and B was lower than that in group C (P<0.05).

Conclusion

1.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine nasal drops are more suitable for pediatric hernia surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia. It can maintain the stability of hemodynamics, reduce stress response and agitation during recovery period, and do not increase the incidence of adverse drug reactions.

表1 3组患儿干预前后血流动力学比较(±s
表2 3组患儿不同时间点应激反应指标比较(±s
表3 3组患儿不同时间点躁动评分比较(分,±s
表4 2组躁动和其他不良反应发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
Ohashi N, Denda S, Furutani K, et al. Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block did not reduce emergence delirium after ambulatory pediatric inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized double-blind study[J]. Surg Today, 2016, 46(8): 963-969.
[2]
欧阳辉旺,王正坤,谢威. 右美托咪定不同给药方式对小儿腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝手术术中血流动力学、应激反应和术后恢复的影响[J]. 广东医学, 2018, 39(13): 152-154.
[3]
尹芳. 右美托咪定对小儿七氟烷麻醉术后躁动的影响分析[J]. 中国医药导刊, 2016, 18(6): 612-613.
[4]
肖春龙,赵婷,张应平. 不同剂量右美托咪定干预七氟醚麻醉患儿苏醒期躁动的应用研究[J]. 大连医科大学学报, 2015, 37(4): 379-381+384.
[5]
岳冬梅,刘苏,张月英, 等. 右美托咪定术前滴鼻在小儿腹股沟疝手术中的应用[J]. 重庆医学, 2016, 45(8): 1034-1036.
[6]
庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮. 现代麻醉学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2003: 828-838.
[7]
Kennedy RR, French RA, Vesto G, et al. The effect of fresh gas flow during induction of anaesthesia on sevoflurane usage: a quality improvement study[J]. Anaesthesia, 2019, 74(7): 875-882.
[8]
邱凤玉,刘丰华,胡智勇. 右美托咪定对七氟烷麻醉后手术患儿的临床研究[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2015, 31(23): 2303-2305.
[9]
Bong CL, Tan J, Lim S, et al. Randomised controlled trial of dexmedetomidine sedation vs general anaesthesia for inguinal hernia surgery on perioperative outcomes in infants[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2019, 122(5): 662-670.
[10]
徐瑾,邓晓明. 右美托咪定滴鼻用于小儿临床麻醉的研究进展[J]. 医学综述, 2016, 22(20): 4068-4071.
[11]
丛海涛,王惠琴,范正芬, 等. 不同剂量右美托咪定滴鼻在麻醉诱导前的应用比较[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2015, 32(7): 882-886.
[12]
张辉,谭媛,王维, 等. 不同剂量右美托咪定经鼻给药在小儿术前镇静应用的比较[J]. 广东医学, 2018, 39(17): 119-122.
[13]
朱明,王璐,顾洪斌. 右美托咪定对手术患儿七氟烷麻醉后血流动力学及苏醒期躁动的影响[J]. 医学综述, 2017, 23(7): 1419-1423.
[14]
李银丽. 不同剂量右美托咪定辅助全身麻醉对患者血流动力学及苏醒质量的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(21): 62-65.
[15]
Hofmann K, Rauh A, Harlizius J, et al. Pain and distress responses of suckling piglets to injection and castration under local anaesthesia with procaine and lidocaine-Part 1: Cortisol, chromogranin A, wound healing, weights, losses[J]. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere, 2019, 47(2): 87-96.
[16]
Zhou M, Wang Q, Zhang Q, et al. Application of pre-injection of dexmedetomidine of different doses in pediatric intravenous general anesthesia without tracheal intubation[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2018, 15(3): 2973-2977.
[17]
殷嘉繁. 右美托咪定对小儿七氟烷麻醉后苏醒期躁动的影响[J]. 医学综述, 2016, 22(3): 560-563.
[18]
赵燕,高巨,林舜艳, 等. 右美托咪定术前滴鼻对全麻患儿术后行为改变的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2016, 32(3): 222-225.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[8] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[9] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[10] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[11] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[12] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[13] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[14] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要