切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 327 -330. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.04.011

所属专题: 超声医学 文献

论著

超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞联合喉罩全身麻醉在小儿疝囊高位结扎术的镇痛效果
魏巍1, 方桥1, 李维1, 田松1,()   
  1. 1. 433200 湖北省洪湖市人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-29 出版日期:2019-08-18
  • 通信作者: 田松

Analgesic effect of ultrasound guided transverse abdominis plane block combined with laryngeal mask general anesthesia on high ligation of hernia sac in children

Wei Wei1, Qiao Fang1, Wei Li1, Song Tian1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Honghu People's Hospital, Hubei Honghu 433200, China
  • Received:2018-12-29 Published:2019-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Song Tian
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tian Song, Email:
引用本文:

魏巍, 方桥, 李维, 田松. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞联合喉罩全身麻醉在小儿疝囊高位结扎术的镇痛效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 327-330.

Wei Wei, Qiao Fang, Wei Li, Song Tian. Analgesic effect of ultrasound guided transverse abdominis plane block combined with laryngeal mask general anesthesia on high ligation of hernia sac in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 327-330.

目的

探究超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞联合喉罩全麻下小儿疝囊高位结扎术的镇痛效果。

方法

选取2016年1月至2018年1月,湖北省洪湖市人民医院150例接受疝囊高位结扎术的患儿,随机分为观察组(75例)和对照组(75例)。对照组采用单纯喉罩全身麻醉,而观察组在对照组基础上进行超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞。比较2组患儿的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、躁动及疼痛评分、苏醒时间、手术时间及并发症发生状况。

结果

观察组的并发症发生率(6.7%)低于对照组(17.3%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患儿手术时间、苏醒时间、躁动评分、12 h小儿疼痛量表(12 h FLACC)评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组插入喉罩后、手术开始时、拔除喉罩时与麻醉诱导前比较,MAP、HR差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组插入喉罩后、拔除喉罩时与麻醉诱导前比较,MAP、HR差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),手术开始时MAP、HR高于麻醉诱导前(P<0.05)。麻醉诱导前、插入喉罩后、拔除喉罩时2组间的MAP、HR差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),手术开始时,观察组的MAP、HR均低于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

小儿疝囊高位结扎术中应用超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞联合喉罩全麻的麻醉效果较好,术后苏醒快,可以缓解患儿术后疼痛及躁动,降低并发症的发生率,具有临床应用价值。

Objective

To explore the analgesic effect of ultrasound guided transverse abdominis plane block combined with laryngeal mask general anesthesia on high ligation of hernia sac in children.

Methods

150 children undergoing high ligation of hernia sac were randomly divided into the observation group (75 cases) and the control group (75 cases). The control group was treated with laryngeal mask general anesthesia, while the observation group was treated with ultrasound guided transverse abdominis plane block on the basis of the control group. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), restlessness and pain scores, recovery time, operative time and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (6.7% vs 17.3%, P<0.05). The operation time, recovery time, restlessness score and 12 h FLACC score in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). In the observation group, there was no significant difference in MAP, HR when the laryngeal mask was inserted, the surgery start time, the laryngeal mask was removed and before anesthesia induction (P>0.05). In the control group, there was no significant difference in MAP, HR when the laryngeal mask was inserted, the laryngeal mask was removed and before anesthesia induction (P>0.05). The MAP, HR at the beginning of operation in the control group was higher than that before anesthesia induction (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in MAP, HR between the two groups (P>0.05) when period before anesthesia induction, the laryngeal mask was inserted ,and after inserting laryngeal mask. At the beginning of operation, the MAP, HR of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block combined with laryngeal mask general anesthesia in high ligation of hernia sac in children can effectively reduce the operation time and postoperative recovery time, relieve postoperative pain and restlessness, and reduce the incidence of complications. It has great clinical application value.

表1 不同时间点2组患儿平均动脉压、心率比较(±s
表2 治疗后2组患儿躁动评分及疼痛评分比较(分,±s
表3 治疗前后2组患儿苏醒时间及手术时间比较(min,±s
表4 治疗前后2组患儿并发症比较
[1]
Gasior AC, Knott EM, Kanters A, et al. Two-center analysis of long-term outcomes after high ligation inguinal hernia repair in adolescents[J]. Am Surg, 2015, 81(12): 1260-1262.
[2]
李辉, 黄河. 经脐单部位双孔腹腔镜小儿疝囊高位结扎术的疗效(附102例报告)[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2017, 23(7): 104-108.
[3]
江兵, 李启信, 唐维平. 单孔法腹腔镜在小儿疝囊高位结扎术的应用效果[J]. 安徽医学, 2017, 38(6): 769-771.
[4]
李瑞斌, 李艳茹, 吴攀, 等. 自制穿刺带线针辅助单孔腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟疝[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(10): 1230-1236.
[5]
高志屹, 程斌. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞用于下腹部手术术后镇痛的效果[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2014, 30(12): 1190-1192.
[6]
葛华有. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞在妇科手术中的应用[J]. 中国医药导刊, 2014, 16(8): 1222-1223.
[7]
崔守勇. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞麻醉在胃癌手术中的镇痛效果观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2018, 22(5): 77-79.
[8]
李立, 张奉超, 彭蓓. 全身麻醉联合超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞与联合骶管阻滞在小儿腹腔镜手术应用的比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2015, 19(11): 174-175.
[9]
章艳君, 刘金柱, 张文静,. 超鞥声引导腹横肌平面阻滞用于患儿疝囊高位结扎术后镇痛[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2015, 31(6): 565-568.
[10]
Yin Y, Zhang H, Zhang X, et al. Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of incarcerated indirect inguinal hernia in children[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2016, 12(6): 3553-3556.
[11]
冯慧悦, 吴祎洁. 单纯喉罩全身麻醉及合并超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞对小儿疝囊高位结扎术麻醉效果的影响[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2016, 26(07): 112-115.
[12]
林胜仙, 孔微微, 李军, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞用于小儿下腹部手术术后镇痛有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国现代医生, 2016, 54(14): 109-113+118.
[13]
徐艳, 田江艳, 刘恒, 等. 地佐辛七氟烷喉罩全麻在小儿疝囊结扎术中的应用效果研究[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志, 2015, 23(4): 137-139.
[14]
Takahashi M, Hotta K, Tamai K, et al. Abdominal Oblique Muscle Hematoma after Ultrasound-guided Transverse Abdominis Plane Block[J]. Masui, 2016, 65(12): 1276-1278.
[15]
李向南, 李建立, 容俊芳. 腹横肌平面阻滞在临床麻醉中的研究进展[J]. 河北医药, 2018, 40(18): 2842-2846.
[16]
戴莲青, 谢丹, 杨喜璇, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在腹膜透析置管术中的应用价值[J]. 海南医学, 2018, 29(5): 715-716.
[17]
翁洪亮, 范成云, 王明敬. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞联合喉罩通气麻醉在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用[J]. 山东医药, 2014, 54(47): 73-75.
[18]
唐楠, 刘新, 陈立坤, 等. 甲磺酸罗哌卡因超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞对疝囊高位结扎术后的镇痛效果[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2016, 27(2): 126-127.
[19]
Şahin AS, Ay N, Şahbaz NA, et al. Analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block using different volumes and concentrations of local analgesics after laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J]. J Int Med Res, 2017, 45(1): 211-219.
[20]
杜鹃, 陈伟, 亢留玉, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在小儿腹腔镜下腹股沟疝手术中的作用[J]. 安徽医药, 2018, 22(4): 729-731.
[21]
刘炯峰, 李敬业, 黄志强. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞联合喉罩通气全身麻醉在小儿疝囊高位结扎术中的应用效果[J]. 吉林医学, 2018, 39(3): 490-492.
[1] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[2] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[3] 利洪艺, 杨浪, 温国洪, 关鸿, 茹江英, 王湘江. 全膝股骨假体矢状面位置与术后膝前痛及功能的关系[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 479-484.
[4] 薛清佩. 玻璃酸钠注射对半月板撕裂患者疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 288-291.
[5] 李熙嵚, 彭友俭. 口腔正畸疼痛的研究新进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 148-152.
[6] 钟轼, 李斌飞, 温君琳, 古晨, 廖小卒. 右美托咪定缓解神经病理性疼痛作用机制的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 237-240.
[7] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[8] 王琦, 陈新, 闵捷, 方露, 刘志奇, 孙伟, 于德新. 膀胱软镜镜检术中改良"Bag Squeeze"法的应用与疼痛焦虑影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 237-241.
[9] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[10] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 周晓艳, 王志钢, 周冬喜. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 579-583.
[13] 付强, 秦丽媛, 李全波. 神经病理性疼痛患者血清miR-15a水平及意义分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 293-298.
[14] 黄涌, 邓宏平, 黄丽, 沈秋桐, 曹汉忠. 耳穴压籽联合经皮穴位电刺激对老年膝关节置换术后急性疼痛的作用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 285-290.
[15] 彭丽, 于娜, 吴雪莲. 老年白内障患者超声乳化术后眼部疼痛原因分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 49-51.
阅读次数
全文


摘要