切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (04) : 456 -460. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.04.020

论著

标准化人文关怀服务在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用
许文娟1,(), 伍翠云2, 许燕1, 倪超1   
  1. 1. 230022 合肥市第三人民医院普外科
    2. 230022 合肥市第三人民医院护理部
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-23 出版日期:2024-08-18
  • 通信作者: 许文娟
  • 基金资助:
    合肥市第三人民医院院级科研项目(SYKY202012)

Application of standardized humanistic care in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Wenjuan Xu1,(), Cuiyun Wu2, Yan Xu1, Chao Ni1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei 230022, China
    2. Department of Nursing, The Third People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei 230022, China
  • Received:2023-08-23 Published:2024-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Wenjuan Xu
引用本文:

许文娟, 伍翠云, 许燕, 倪超. 标准化人文关怀服务在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 456-460.

Wenjuan Xu, Cuiyun Wu, Yan Xu, Chao Ni. Application of standardized humanistic care in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 456-460.

目的

探究标准化人文关怀服务在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用。

方法

选取2020年8月至2023年6月合肥市第三人民医院收治的接受腹腔镜疝修补术治疗的腹股沟疝患者120例,采用随机数字表法分为2组,每组60例。观察组接受标准化人文关怀服务,对照组接受常规干预。统计2组患者伤口愈合时间、住院时间、并发症发生率;采用数字分级评分法(NRS)评估患者术后疼痛情况,广泛性焦虑量表(GAD-7)及健康问卷抑郁症状群量表(PHQ-9)评估患者心理状态,纽卡斯尔护理满意度量表(NSNS)评估患者护理满意度。

结果

观察组伤口愈合时间[(5.31±1.17)d]、住院时间[(2.16±0.52)d]均短于对照组[(7.43±2.08)d、(4.33±1.22)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者术后1 d NRS评分[(3.92±1.32)分]、3 d NRS评分[(2.53±0.87)分]均低于对照组[(4.63±1.51)分、(3.48±1.16)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后观察组患者GAD-7评分[(10.53±2.09)分]、PHQ-9评分[(12.13±3.24)分]均低于对照组[(13.65±2.56)分、(16.53±2.97)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率(3.33%)低于对照组(15.00%),护理满意度(96.67%)高于对照组(85.00%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

标准化人文关怀服务在腹腔镜腹股沟疝患者中效果显著,可缩短患者伤口愈合时间以及手术时间,并可改善患者术后疼痛情况、心理状态以及并发症情况,有利于提高护理满意度。

Objective

To investigate the application of standardized humanistic care in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

A total of 120 patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the Third People's Hospital of Hefei from August 2020 to June 2023 were selected. Using the random number table method, they were divided into two groups, with 60 cases in each group. The observation group received standardized humanistic care and the control group received routine intervention. Wound healing time and length of hospital stay were recorded. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS) were used to evaluated patient nursing satisfaction.

Results

The wound healing time [(5.31±1.17) days] and hospital stay [(2.16±0.52) days] in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(7.43±2.08), (4.33±1.22) days], with statistical significance (P<0.05). The NRS scores on postoperative day 1 [(3.92±1.32) points] and day 3 [(2.53±0.87) points] in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group [(4.63±1.51), (3.48±1.16) points], with statistical significance (P<0.05). After the intervention, the GAD-7 score [(10.53±2.09) points] and PHQ-9 score [(12.13±3.24) points] in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group [(13.65±2.56), (16.53±2.97) points], with statistical significance (P<0.05). The complication rate in the observation group (3.33%) was significantly lower than in the control group (15.00%), and the nursing satisfaction rate (96.67%) was significantly higher than in the control group (85.00%), both with statistical significance (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Standardized humanistic care services have a significant effect on patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. This approach can shorten wound healing time and hospital stay, improve postoperative pain, psychological state, and reduce the incidence of complications, thereby enhancing nursing satisfaction.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者伤口愈合时间及住院时间比较(d,±s
表3 2组患者术后NRS评分比较(分,±s
表4 2组患者心理状态比较(分,±s
表5 2组患者并发症比较[例(%)]
表6 2组患者护理满意度比较[例(%)]
[1]
Spivak J, Chan PH, Prentice HA, et al. Mesh-based inguinal hernia repairs in an integrated healthcare system and surgeon and hospital volume: a cohort study of 110, 808 patients from over a decade[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(5): 1209-1223.
[2]
王俐超, 李娟, 丁根, 等. 基于改良早期预警评分的分级护理在腹股沟疝术后患儿中的应用[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2022, 19(22): 3425-3427.
[3]
刘威, 沈根海, 高泉根, 等. 全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术与开放手术治疗女性腹股沟疝的比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2023, 23(5): 354-358.
[4]
王倩. 老年人腹股沟疝手术围手术期的循证护理效果观察[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2019, 6(39): 142.
[5]
陈创容, 吴家萍, 马晓欣. 人文关怀护理对分娩产妇恐惧感和顺产率的影响[J]. 广州医科大学学报, 2022, 50(2): 94-97.
[6]
吴崇才, 林鸿彪. PKURP术联合同期行TEP对老年前列腺增生合并腹股沟疝治疗的效果[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(13): 3152-3155.
[7]
胡帅, 付佳, 叶雨阳, 等. 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞在腹腔镜疝修补术后加速康复中的应用[J]. 山东医药, 2022, 62(22): 65-68.
[8]
Escribano N, Belliard V, Baracco B, et al. numeric rating scale: agreement among evaluators on endodontic treatments performed by dental students[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2023, 23(1): 197.
[9]
Lee C, Round JM, Hanlon JG, et al. Generalized anxiety disorder 7-Item(GAD-7) scores in medically authorized cannabis patients- Ontario and Alberta, Canada[J]. Can J Psychiatry, 2022, 67(6): 470-480.
[10]
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2001, 16(9): 606-613.
[11]
Thomas LH, Mccoll E, Priest J, et al. Newcastle satisfaction with nursing scales: an instrument for quality assessments of nursing care[J]. Qual Health Care, 1996, 5(2): 67-72.
[12]
李金东, 王晨星, 胡延岩, 等. 青年腹股沟疝临床特点及腹腔镜手术治疗疗效分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2022, 42(1): 114-119.
[13]
唐楠. 老年腹股沟疝患者腹腔镜修补术后血清肿相关因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2022, 42(4): 865-868.
[14]
陆云. 童趣化诱导干预对腹股沟疝术后患儿疼痛及改良耶鲁围术期焦虑量表评分的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2023, 38(7): 1232-1235.
[15]
韩成艳, 丁艳红, 黄燕, 等. 心理干预联合人文关怀在消化内镜诊疗患者的应用[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(1): 15-19.
[16]
顾丽丽,周晓梅,胡敏.人文关怀联合认知护理对肝癌手术患者围手术期心理状态和睡眠质量的影响[J].中西医结合护理(中英文), 2020, 12 (6):149-151.
[17]
刘聪聪, 王玉, 韩瑜. 基于一米法则的护理质量改善在ICU噪声管理中的应用研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2019, 35(9): 685-689.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?