切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 254 -257. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.03.016

所属专题: 文献

论著

自固定补片与普通聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的疗效
颜俊1, 肖剑1, 刘冰1,()   
  1. 1. 405400 重庆市开州区中医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-30 出版日期:2019-06-18
  • 通信作者: 刘冰
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市开州区科技计划项目(开财企{36}38号)

Comparison of application effects between self-gripping mesh and conventional polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair

Jun Yan1, Jian Xiao1, Bing Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Deapartment of General Surgery, Kaizhou District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing 404100, China
  • Received:2018-12-30 Published:2019-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Bing Liu
引用本文:

颜俊, 肖剑, 刘冰. 自固定补片与普通聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 254-257.

Jun Yan, Jian Xiao, Bing Liu. Comparison of application effects between self-gripping mesh and conventional polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(03): 254-257.

目的

比较自固定补片与普通聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术(laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal,TEP)中的应用效果。

方法

选取2016年1月至2018年1月,重庆市开州区中医院收治的160例腹股沟疝患者为研究对象,回顾性分析其临床资料。所有患者均行TEP术式,根据术中使用补片的不同将其分为试验组(87例)及对照组(73例),2组均随访6个月。比较2组手术指标及疼痛情况,统计并比较2组术后并发症及疝复发情况。

结果

试验组手术时间、铺片耗时、术后首次排便时间显著短于对照组,住院费用显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组住院时间及术后首次排气时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。自术前至术后6个月,2组视觉模拟评分(visual analogue score,VAS)均呈下降趋势(P<0.05),术后1、2及6个月试验组VAS评分均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组并发症发生率(5.75%)显著低于对照组(16.44%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

自固定补片在TEP中的应用效果突出,可有效缩短手术时间、铺片时间与术后首次排便时间,且患者术后疼痛较轻、并发症发生率较低,但其费用较高,可在临床条件允许下优先选择自固定补片。

Objective

To compare the effect of self-gripping mesh and conventional polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP).

Methods

160 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to Kaizhou district Traditional Chinese Medicine hospital from January 2016 to January 2018 were selected as the research objects, and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with TEP, and they were divided into the experimental group (n=87) and the control group (n=73) according to the difference of mesh used during the operation. The two groups were followed up for 6 months. The clinical indicators and postoperative pain were compared between the two groups, and the complications and recurrence of hernia were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time, paving time and first defecation time of the experimental group were significantly shorter than those of the control group, and the hospitalization expenses was significantly higher than those of the control group. (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the hospitalization time and the first exhaust time between the two groups (P>0.05). The VAS scores of the two groups showed a downward trend from before operation to 6 months after operation (P<0.05), the experiment group was significantly lower than the control group at 1, 2 and 6 months after operation (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (5.75 vs. 16.44%, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The application of self-gripping mesh in TEP is very effective, which can effectively shorten the operation time, paving time and first defecation time, and the pain is lighter and the incidence of complications is lower, but the cost is higher. The results suggest that the self-gripping mesh should be given priority in clinical practice.

表1 2组临床指标比较(±s
表2 2组手术前后视觉模拟评分比较(分,±s
[1]
张士虎,邓正明,张翼, 等. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术55例体会[J]. 江苏医药, 2016, 42(20): 2281-2282.
[2]
Lamblin G, Dubernard G, De SHP, et al. Assessment of synthetic glue for mesh attachment in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a prospective multicenter pilot study[J]. J Minim Invas Gyn, 2017, 24(1): 41.
[3]
曹磊,吕生辉,胡伟. 喉罩与气管导管全麻应用于小儿腹腔镜疝修补术中的效果对比[J]. 贵州医药, 2017, 41(6): 624-625.
[4]
王帆,靳翠红,赵凤林, 等. 自固定补片与钉合固定补片在巨大腹股沟疝行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的对比研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(6): 911-914.
[5]
沈志浩,黄晓睛,徐雁呜, 等. 基层医院腹股沟疝疾病诊断相关分组研究与住院费用标准的合理化探讨[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2016, 33(2): 304-306.
[6]
Finitsis DJ, Pellowski JA, Huedo-Medina TB, et al. Visual analogue scale(VAS) measurement of antiretroviral adherence in people living with HIV(PLWH): a meta-analysis[J]. J Behav Med, 2016, 39(6): 1043-1055.
[7]
Balta AZ, Senol Z, Sucullu I. Comment to: A simplified surgical technique for recurrent inguinal hernia repair following total extraperitoneal patch plastic. Knyazeva P, Alesina PF, Stadelmeier P, et al[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(4): 721-722.
[8]
肖强,曾军,梁海飞, 等. 不同术式的疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝后的临床疗效观察[J]. 河北医学, 2017, 23(4): 603-607.
[9]
孟飞龙,英明,张春宇, 等. 全腹膜外与经腹膜腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗网塞型补片修补术后复发性腹股沟疝的体会[J]. 中国实用医药, 2017, 12(20): 37-38.
[10]
黄亮,余壮明,李军, 等. 自固定聚丙烯/聚乳酸复合补片改善腹股沟疝无张力修补后的慢性疼痛[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2018, 22(6): 908-913.
[11]
朱建明,徐一宁,蒋海峰, 等. 自固定补片和传统补片在老年腹股沟斜疝患者手术治疗中的比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 311-313.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[11] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[12] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[13] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[14] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[15] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要