切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 254 -257. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.03.016

所属专题: 文献

论著

自固定补片与普通聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的疗效
颜俊1, 肖剑1, 刘冰1,()   
  1. 1. 405400 重庆市开州区中医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-30 出版日期:2019-06-18
  • 通信作者: 刘冰
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市开州区科技计划项目(开财企{36}38号)

Comparison of application effects between self-gripping mesh and conventional polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair

Jun Yan1, Jian Xiao1, Bing Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Deapartment of General Surgery, Kaizhou District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing 404100, China
  • Received:2018-12-30 Published:2019-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Bing Liu
引用本文:

颜俊, 肖剑, 刘冰. 自固定补片与普通聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 254-257.

Jun Yan, Jian Xiao, Bing Liu. Comparison of application effects between self-gripping mesh and conventional polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(03): 254-257.

目的

比较自固定补片与普通聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术(laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal,TEP)中的应用效果。

方法

选取2016年1月至2018年1月,重庆市开州区中医院收治的160例腹股沟疝患者为研究对象,回顾性分析其临床资料。所有患者均行TEP术式,根据术中使用补片的不同将其分为试验组(87例)及对照组(73例),2组均随访6个月。比较2组手术指标及疼痛情况,统计并比较2组术后并发症及疝复发情况。

结果

试验组手术时间、铺片耗时、术后首次排便时间显著短于对照组,住院费用显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组住院时间及术后首次排气时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。自术前至术后6个月,2组视觉模拟评分(visual analogue score,VAS)均呈下降趋势(P<0.05),术后1、2及6个月试验组VAS评分均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组并发症发生率(5.75%)显著低于对照组(16.44%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

自固定补片在TEP中的应用效果突出,可有效缩短手术时间、铺片时间与术后首次排便时间,且患者术后疼痛较轻、并发症发生率较低,但其费用较高,可在临床条件允许下优先选择自固定补片。

Objective

To compare the effect of self-gripping mesh and conventional polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP).

Methods

160 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to Kaizhou district Traditional Chinese Medicine hospital from January 2016 to January 2018 were selected as the research objects, and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with TEP, and they were divided into the experimental group (n=87) and the control group (n=73) according to the difference of mesh used during the operation. The two groups were followed up for 6 months. The clinical indicators and postoperative pain were compared between the two groups, and the complications and recurrence of hernia were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time, paving time and first defecation time of the experimental group were significantly shorter than those of the control group, and the hospitalization expenses was significantly higher than those of the control group. (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the hospitalization time and the first exhaust time between the two groups (P>0.05). The VAS scores of the two groups showed a downward trend from before operation to 6 months after operation (P<0.05), the experiment group was significantly lower than the control group at 1, 2 and 6 months after operation (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (5.75 vs. 16.44%, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The application of self-gripping mesh in TEP is very effective, which can effectively shorten the operation time, paving time and first defecation time, and the pain is lighter and the incidence of complications is lower, but the cost is higher. The results suggest that the self-gripping mesh should be given priority in clinical practice.

表1 2组临床指标比较(±s
表2 2组手术前后视觉模拟评分比较(分,±s
[1]
张士虎,邓正明,张翼, 等. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术55例体会[J]. 江苏医药, 2016, 42(20): 2281-2282.
[2]
Lamblin G, Dubernard G, De SHP, et al. Assessment of synthetic glue for mesh attachment in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a prospective multicenter pilot study[J]. J Minim Invas Gyn, 2017, 24(1): 41.
[3]
曹磊,吕生辉,胡伟. 喉罩与气管导管全麻应用于小儿腹腔镜疝修补术中的效果对比[J]. 贵州医药, 2017, 41(6): 624-625.
[4]
王帆,靳翠红,赵凤林, 等. 自固定补片与钉合固定补片在巨大腹股沟疝行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的对比研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(6): 911-914.
[5]
沈志浩,黄晓睛,徐雁呜, 等. 基层医院腹股沟疝疾病诊断相关分组研究与住院费用标准的合理化探讨[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2016, 33(2): 304-306.
[6]
Finitsis DJ, Pellowski JA, Huedo-Medina TB, et al. Visual analogue scale(VAS) measurement of antiretroviral adherence in people living with HIV(PLWH): a meta-analysis[J]. J Behav Med, 2016, 39(6): 1043-1055.
[7]
Balta AZ, Senol Z, Sucullu I. Comment to: A simplified surgical technique for recurrent inguinal hernia repair following total extraperitoneal patch plastic. Knyazeva P, Alesina PF, Stadelmeier P, et al[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(4): 721-722.
[8]
肖强,曾军,梁海飞, 等. 不同术式的疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝后的临床疗效观察[J]. 河北医学, 2017, 23(4): 603-607.
[9]
孟飞龙,英明,张春宇, 等. 全腹膜外与经腹膜腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗网塞型补片修补术后复发性腹股沟疝的体会[J]. 中国实用医药, 2017, 12(20): 37-38.
[10]
黄亮,余壮明,李军, 等. 自固定聚丙烯/聚乳酸复合补片改善腹股沟疝无张力修补后的慢性疼痛[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2018, 22(6): 908-913.
[11]
朱建明,徐一宁,蒋海峰, 等. 自固定补片和传统补片在老年腹股沟斜疝患者手术治疗中的比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 311-313.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?