切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 258 -260. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.03.017

所属专题: 文献

论著

3D补片在腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效
田宝明1,(), 王乐增1, 张慧1   
  1. 1. 252800 山东聊城,高唐县人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-27 出版日期:2019-06-18
  • 通信作者: 田宝明

Application effect of 3D patch in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

Baoming Tian1,(), Lezeng Wang1, Hui Zhang1   

  1. 1. Gaotang County People's Hospital, Shandong, Liaocheng 252800, China
  • Received:2018-11-27 Published:2019-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Baoming Tian
引用本文:

田宝明, 王乐增, 张慧. 3D补片在腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 258-260.

Baoming Tian, Lezeng Wang, Hui Zhang. Application effect of 3D patch in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(03): 258-260.

目的

探讨3D补片在腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果。

方法

选取2015年10月至2017年10月,高唐县人民医院92例腹股沟疝患者为研究对象,回顾性分析其临床资料。所有患者均行完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术,依据术中采用补片的不同分为观察组(46例)与对照组(46例),对照组采用普通补片修补疝缺口,观察组采用3D补片修补疝缺口,2组患者在术后定期随访6个月。比较2组治疗效果及术后康复情况。

结果

2组间术中出血量、手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但观察组患者术后下床活动时间、术后住院时间均显著较对照组缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术前至术后3 d 2组视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)均呈下降趋势,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且除术前外各时间点观察组VAS评分均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后2组间并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中应用3D补片可显著促进患者康复,缩短术后住院时间与下床活动时间,提升治疗效果。

Objective

To explore the application effect of 3D patch in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

The clinical data of 92 patients with inguinal hernia treated in Gaotang County People's hospital from October 2015 to October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with TEP repair. According to the different patches used during the operation, they were divided into the observation group (n=46) and the control group (n=46). The hernia defect was repaired by ordinary patch in the control group, while 3D patch was used in the observation group. The patients in the two groups were followed up regularly for 6 months after operation. The therapeutic effect and postoperative rehabilitation between the two groups were compared.

Results

There was no significant difference in blood loss and operation time between the two groups (P>0.05), but the time of getting out of bed and hospitalization time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). The VAS scores of the two groups decreased from preoperative to 3 days postoperative (P<0.05), and the VAS scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group at each time points after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The application of 3D patch in laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair can significantly promote the rehabilitation of patients, shorten the time of hospitalization and out of bed, and improve the therapeutic effect.

表1 2组手术相关指标比较(±s
表2 2组手术前后视觉模拟评分比较(分,±s
[1]
张云,郝晓晖,李健文, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(10): 967-971.
[2]
Han YD, Park S, Kim WR, et al. Safety and efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: comparative study with conventional laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2017, 27(3): 253-258.
[3]
费昱达,曾玉剑,孙亮, 等. 全腹膜外与经腹膜腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗网塞型补片修补术后复发的体会[J]. 重庆医学, 2016, 1(2): 255-256.
[4]
曹婧. 应用3D补片行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的随访研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2015.
[5]
Neinstein RM, Matarasso A, Abramson DL. Concomitant abdominoplasty and umbilical hernia repair using the Ventralex hernia patch[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2015, 135(4): 1021-1025.
[6]
顾霖. 成人腹股沟疝造影术操作技术,正常解剖及疝的诊断标准[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 1982, 10(4): 222-223.
[7]
周凌阳,陈伦宽,陈侃松, 等. 三种不同腹股沟疝手术修补方案的临床有效性及安全性对照探究[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2015, 24(4): 619-622.
[8]
Shalaby R, Ismail M, Samaha A, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair; experience with 874 children[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2014, 49(3): 460-464.
[9]
杨喜光,向国安,陈小勋, 等. 完全腹膜化腹腔内置网片修补兔腹股沟疝的研究[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2014, 31(12): 2756-2757.
[10]
廖宇. 经腹腔镜腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗成人双侧腹股沟疝效果观察[J]. 中外医学研究, 2016, 14(35): 129-130.
[11]
朱江,徐新利,张金辉. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝中不同补片固定方式的对比研究[J]. 新疆医科大学学报, 2015, 38(5): 601-603.
[12]
Reddy KM, Humphreys W, Chew A, et al. Inguinal hernia repair with the Kugel patch[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2015, 75(1/2): 43-47.
[13]
辜树勇,沈映玲,郑宗珩. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中聚丙烯3D补片应用的价值分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(4): 323-326.
[14]
党晨珀,江道振,刘晟, 等. 比较经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中应用3D免钉合补片与普通平片的临床随机对照试验[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2015, 4(7): 543-546.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[4] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[6] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10] 李三祥, 李佳, 刘俊峰, 吕东晨, 方晖东, 谭朝晖, 刘杰, 潘佐, 乔建坤. 基于CT影像的三维重建成像技术在腹腔镜大肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 570-574.
[11] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[12] 汪帮琦, 陈波特, 林浩坚, 许晖阳, 王镇伟, 袁雪峰, 林康健, 邱晓拂. 经腹入路3D腹腔镜联合输尿管硬镜同期处理肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻并肾盏结石的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 597-600.
[13] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[14] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
[15] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
阅读次数
全文


摘要