切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 356 -359. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.05.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

主动减容联合Onlay术在治疗巨大腹壁疝及预防其相关并发症的临床应用
阿不都外里1, 麦麦提艾力2, 赛甫丁2, 李赞林2, 克力木2,()   
  1. 1. 830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院肝胆外科
    2. 830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝与腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-18 出版日期:2018-10-18
  • 通信作者: 克力木

Clinical application of initiative content reduction with Onlay surgery in the treatment of large ventral hernia and prevention of its complications

Abuduwaili1, Maimaitiaili2, Saifuding2, Zanlin Li2, Kelimu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Urumqi 830000, China
    2. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Urumqi 830000, China
  • Received:2017-10-18 Published:2018-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Kelimu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Kelimu, Email:
引用本文:

阿不都外里, 麦麦提艾力, 赛甫丁, 李赞林, 克力木. 主动减容联合Onlay术在治疗巨大腹壁疝及预防其相关并发症的临床应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 356-359.

Abuduwaili, Maimaitiaili, Saifuding, Zanlin Li, Kelimu. Clinical application of initiative content reduction with Onlay surgery in the treatment of large ventral hernia and prevention of its complications[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(05): 356-359.

目的

探讨主动减容联合Onlay术在治疗巨大腹壁疝及防治其相关并发症中的临床应用。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2016年6月,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院18例巨大腹壁疝患者的临床资料,术前均通过MSCT测疝囊容积、腹腔容积、疝环大小,根据容积比选择主动减容联合Onlay术,观察其手术时间、切除肠管长度、出血量、膀胱内压力、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、下床活动时间、引流管拔出时间、住院时间、并发症发生率及复发情况率。

结果

平均手术时间为(2.1±0.8)h,切除肠管长度为(49.4±15.0)cm,术中出血量为(82±30.1)ml。膀胱内测压:IAHⅠ级3例(3/18),出现IAHⅡ级1例(1/18),无IAH Ⅲ、Ⅳ级发生;围手术期无腹腔间室综合征发生,无死亡病例;患者术后均未出现心、肝、肾及呼吸功能异常;有2例出现切口积液,1例术后出现切口浅表感染,经对症处理后好转,无迟发感染;随访8~24个月,平均随访时间(14.0±2.1)个月,有1例患者出现腹壁切口疝复发,暂未行二次手术。

结论

主动减容联合Onlay术治疗巨大腹壁疝可有效防治术后由于腹腔内高压所导致的相关并发症发生,安全可行。

Objective

To explore the clinical application of initiative content reduction with Onlay surgery for the treatment of large incisional hernia and prevention its complications.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 18 cases of large incisional hernia in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital from January 2015 to June 2016, and all patients underwent preoperative MSCT to measure the volume of the hernia sac and the volume of abdominal cavity, the diameter of the hernia size. The initiative content reduction with Onlay surgery was performed according to the volume ratio. The operation time, blood loss, resection length, intravesical pressure, normal activity time, duration in hospital time, complications and recurrence rate were observed.

Results

The mean operation time was (2.1±0.8) hours; the resection length was (49.4±15) cm; blood loss was (82±30.1) ml. The intravesical pressure showed that there were 3 cases (3/18) of IAH Grade Ⅰ, 1 case (1/18) of IAH Grade Ⅱ, none of ACS during perioperative period (IAH Ⅲ, IAH Ⅳ), no deaths. There were 2 cases of incision effusion and 1 case of incisional infection, improved after symptomatic treatment, no delayed infection. After 8 to 24 months of follow-up, one patient had recurrence without re-operation.

Conclusion

Initiative content reduction combined with Onlay surgery is safe and feasible to prevent the complications associated with intra-abdominal pressure of large incisional hernia repair, worthy spreading and need to further study.

图1 1A 切除的小肠及其系膜;1B PDS-Ⅱ线连续缝合关闭疝环;1C 放置补片并固定
[1]
Deerenberg EB, Timmermans L, Hogerzeil DP, et al. A systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia.[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(1):89-101.
[2]
中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组. 腹壁切口疝诊疗指南(2014年版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 52(6):487-489.
[3]
Malbrain ML, De Keulenaer BL, Oda J, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in burns, obesity, pregnancy, and general medicine[J]. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther, 2015, 47(3):228-240.
[4]
Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De WJ, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2013, 39(7):1190-1206.
[5]
Oliver-Allen HS, Hunter C, Lee GK. Abdominal compartment syndrome as a rare complication following component separation repair: case report and review of the literature[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(2):293-299.
[6]
Sabbagh C, Dumont F, Robert B, et al. Peritoneal volume is predictive of tension-free fascia closure of large incisional hernias with loss of domain: a prospective study[J]. Hernia, 2011, 15(5):559-565.
[7]
陈杰,秦昌富,申英末. 主动减容手术在巨大腹壁疝治疗中的应用和进展[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(10):950-953
[8]
杨硕,陈杰,曹金鑫, 等. 主动减容手术防治肥胖患者巨大腹壁疝修补术后腹腔内高压的应用价值[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(10):957-960.
[9]
唐健雄. 对"主动减容手术防治肥胖患者巨大腹壁疝修补术后腹腔内高压的应用价值"的点评[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(10):960.
[10]
Wu YF, Zheng YP, Zhang N, et al. Study on the correlation between the changes in intra-abdominal pressure and renal functional in the patients with abdominal compartment syndrome[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2015, 19(19):3682-3687.
[11]
Bikhchandani J. Fitzgibbons RJ. Repair of giant ventral hernias[J]. Adv Surg, 2013, 47(1):1-27.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[3] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[7] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[8] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[9] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[10] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[11] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[12] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[13] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[14] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[15] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
阅读次数
全文


摘要