切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 264 -267. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.04.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

疝囊剥离与横断在男性腹股沟斜疝中的随机对照研究
刘国忠1, 翁山耕1,(), 张建斌1   
  1. 1. 350005 福州,福建医科大学附属第一医院肝胆胰外科、疝外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-28 出版日期:2018-08-18
  • 通信作者: 翁山耕
  • 基金资助:
    国家临床重点专科建设项目(2013-GJLCZD); 福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(JAT160191)

Dissection or transection of the indirect inguinal hernia sac in males: A randomized controlled trial

Guozhong Liu1, Shangeng Weng1,(), Jianbin Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery & Hernia Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China
  • Received:2017-01-28 Published:2018-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Shangeng Weng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Weng Shangeng, Email:
引用本文:

刘国忠, 翁山耕, 张建斌. 疝囊剥离与横断在男性腹股沟斜疝中的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 264-267.

Guozhong Liu, Shangeng Weng, Jianbin Zhang. Dissection or transection of the indirect inguinal hernia sac in males: A randomized controlled trial[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(04): 264-267.

目的

前瞻性比较前入路Kugel修补术中疝囊完全剥离与疝囊横断远端旷置2种不同处理方式对男性腹股沟斜疝患者的临床疗效。

方法

收集2014年1月至2016年12月,福建医科大学附属第一医院120例原发性男性腹股沟斜疝患者临床资料。采用随机数字表法分成疝囊完全剥离组和疝囊横断旷置组。比较2组手术时间、术后住院时间、术后视觉模拟疼痛评分(visual analogue score,VAS)、血肿、血清肿、切口感染、异物感、复发率发生情况。

结果

疝囊完全剥离组在术后第1天疼痛VAS评分(2.4±0.7)、血清肿(1例)、术后2周恢复活动人数(57例)及异物感(4例)方面明显优于疝囊横断旷置组(2.7±0.9、7例、50例、12例),差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。而2组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后血肿、尿潴留、阴囊积液、切口感染、术后4周恢复活动人数、慢性疼痛、精索和睾丸并发症及复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

男性腹股沟斜疝患者术中疝囊完全剥离可明显降低术后早期疼痛及血清肿发生,有利患者早期恢复。

Objective

This study compares the effect of dissection and transection of the hernia sac in anterior Kugel repair for indirect inguinal hernia in males.

Methods

This prospective randomized controlled trial included 120 patients with primary indirect inguinal hernia. 120 patients were divided into 2 groups randomly. In group A, the hernia sac was dissected totally. In group B, the hernia sac was transected at the neck and then ligated. Each group contained 60 patients. Finally, 58 patients in group A and 56 patients in group B were involved in the analyses. The effect of the two methods in operation time, hospital stays after operation, VAS pain score after operation, hematoma, seroma, incision infection, foreign body sensation, and recurrence were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

Group A was superior to group B in VAS pain score on the first day after operation, seroma, return to normal activities after two weeks, and foreign body sensation (P<0.05). The results were comparable in operation time, surgical blood loss, hospital stays after operation, hematoma, urinary retention, hydrocele of testes, incision infection, return to normal activities after four weeks, chronic pain, complication in testis and spermatic cord, and recurrence (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Neither of totally dissection of the hernia sac or transection of the hernia sac has serious adverse effects on the surgery. Totally dissection of the hernia sac can reduce the risk of postoperative complications, and is a proper method for indirect inguinal hernia repair in male patient.

图1 疝囊完全剥离组(A+B)和横断旷置组(C+D)的疝囊处理方式
表1 疝囊完全剥离组和横断旷置组患者术前临床资料比较
表2 疝囊完全剥离组和横断旷置组患者术后评价指标比较(±s
表3 疝囊完全剥离组和横断旷置组患者术后近期并发症比较
表4 疝囊完全剥离组和横断旷置组腹股沟斜疝患者术后远期并发症比较(例)
[1]
Suwa K, Nakajima S, Hanyu K, et al. Modified Kugel herniorrhaphy using standardized dissection technique of the preperitoneal space: long-term operative outcome in consecutive 340 patients with inguinal hernia[J]. Hernia, 2013, 17(6): 699-707.
[2]
Dogru O, Girgin M, Bulbuller N, et al. Comparison of Kugel and Lichtenstein operations for inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized study[J]. World J Surg, 2006, 30(3): 346-350.
[3]
Zib M, Gani J. Inguinal hernia repair: where to next?[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2002, 72(8): 573-579.
[4]
中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组. 成人腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2014年版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 52(6): 484-486
[5]
阮宁, 翁山耕, 林春忠, 等. 腹股沟疝Kugel补片修补日间手术临床应用[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2008, 13(6): 579-580.
[6]
Othman I, Hady HA. Hernia sac of indirect inguinal hernia: invagination, excision, or ligation?[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(2): 199-204.
[7]
Kao CY, Li CL, Lin CC, et al. Sac ligation in inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Int J Surg, 2015, 19: 55-60.
[8]
Nikkolo C, Lepner U. Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair[J]. Postgrad Med, 2016, 128(1): 69-75.
[9]
姚胜, 李基业. B超检查诊断腹壁疝无张力修补术后积液[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2009, 14(2): 215-216.
[10]
Morales-Conde S. A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(3): 261-267.
[11]
Abrahamson J. Etiology and pathophysiology of primary and recurrent groin hernia formation[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 1998, 78(6): 953-972.
[12]
Scott NW, Mccormack K, Graham P, et al. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2002(4): CD002197.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[4] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[5] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[6] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[7] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[8] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[9] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[10] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[11] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[12] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[13] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[14] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[15] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?