切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 184 -188. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.02.011

论著

耻脐入路单孔腹腔镜后鞘后技术在脐疝修补术中的应用
陈志升1, 司仙科1,†(), 吴卫东2, 李森1, 杨佳华1, 李炜1, 郑侃1, 于昆1, 罗晓睿1, 葛卫红3   
  1. 1. 200062　上海中医药大学附属普陀医院微创外科
    2. 200080　上海交通大学医学院附属第一人民医院胃肠外科
    3. 215300　江苏省昆山市第五人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-28 出版日期:2024-04-18
  • 通信作者: 司仙科
  • 基金资助:
    上海中医药大学附属普陀医院百人计划(领航计划2022-RCLH-03)

Application of the supraumbilical single-port laparoscopic preperitoneal technique in umbilical hernia repair

Zhisheng Chen1, Xianke Si1,†(), Weidong Wu2, Sen Li1, Jiahua Yang1, Wei Li1, Kan Zheng1, Kun Yu1, Xiaorui Luo1, Weihong Ge3   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200062, China
    2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
    3. Department of General Surgery, The Fifth People's Hospital of Kunshan City, Suzhou 215300, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2023-11-28 Published:2024-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Xianke Si
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

陈志升, 司仙科, 吴卫东, 李森, 杨佳华, 李炜, 郑侃, 于昆, 罗晓睿, 葛卫红. 耻脐入路单孔腹腔镜后鞘后技术在脐疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 184-188.

Zhisheng Chen, Xianke Si, Weidong Wu, Sen Li, Jiahua Yang, Wei Li, Kan Zheng, Kun Yu, Xiaorui Luo, Weihong Ge. Application of the supraumbilical single-port laparoscopic preperitoneal technique in umbilical hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 184-188.

目的

探讨耻脐入路单孔腹腔镜后鞘后修补术治疗脐疝的临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性研究2021年6月至2023年8月，上海中医药大学附属普陀医院微创外科收治的18例实施耻脐入路单孔腹腔镜后鞘后疝修补术的脐疝患者，根据临床病例资料、手术操作的技术细节及术后随访情况，分析该术式的临床效果及获益。

结果

18例患者均顺利完成手术，无中转开放手术，平均手术时间（106.67±28.49）min，术后6～8 h下床活动，术后8、24 h视觉模拟评分分别为2.94、2.50分，术后平均住院时间为（2.02±0.63）d；术后均无出血、肠梗阻、肠瘘、脐部坏死等严重并发症；随访时间为3～28个月，随访率100%，无复发。

结论

耻脐入路行单孔腹腔镜下后鞘后脐疝修补术安全可行，隐瘢痕效果好，术后疼痛轻，恢复快，可作为腹腔镜下脐疝修补的一种选择术式。

关键词: 脐疝, 耻脐入路, 腹腔镜，单孔, 后鞘后间隙, 疝修补术
Objective

To explore the clinical application value of the supraumbilical single-port laparoscopic preperitoneal repair technique in the treatment of umbilical hernias.

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed 18 patients who underwent umbilical hernia repair using the supraumbilical single-port laparoscopic preperitoneal technique at the Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Putuo Hospital, affiliated with Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, from June 2021 to August 2023. The clinical outcomes and benefits were analyzed based on clinical data, technical details of the surgical procedure, and postoperative follow-up.

Results

All 18 patients successfully underwent surgery without conversion to open surgery. The average operation time was 106.67±28.49 minutes. Patients were encouraged to ambulate for 6 to 8 hours postoperatively. The visual analog scale scores at 8 and 24 hours postoperatively were 2.94 and 2.50, respectively. The average postoperative hospital stay was (2.02±0.63) days. There were no serious complications such as bleeding, intestinal obstruction, enterocutaneous fistula, or umbilical necrosis postoperatively. Follow-up periods ranged from 3 to 28 months, with a 100% follow-up rate and no recurrence observed.

Conclusion

The supraumbilical single-port laparoscopic preperitoneal umbilical hernia repair technique is safe and feasible, offering excellent cosmetic results with minimal scarring, less postoperative pain, and rapid recovery. It can be considered an alternative technique for laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair.

Key words: Umbilical hernia, Supraumbilical approach, Laparoscopy, Single-port, Preperitoneal space, Hernia repair
图9 术后瘢痕效果。
表1 实施耻脐入路单孔腹腔镜后鞘后修补术患者的术后随访资料[例（%）]
随访时间 例数 异物感 手术区域疼痛 活动受限 手术整体满意度 切口满意度
无痛 轻度疼痛 中度疼痛 重度疼痛 非常满意 满意 一般 不满意 非常不满意 满意 一般 不满意
术后1周 18 3(16.67) 15(83.33) 2(11.11) 1(5.56) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 16(88.89) 2(11.11) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 18(100.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00)
术后1个月 18 1(5.56) 17(94.44) 1(5.56) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 17(94.44) 1(5.56) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 18(100.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00)
术后3个月 18 0(0.00) 18(100.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 18(100.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 18(100.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00)
[1]
Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(4): 407-414.
[2]
Kulacoglu H, Yazicioglu D, Ozyaylali I. Prosthetic repair of umbilical hernias in adults with local anesthesia in a daycase setting: a comprehensive report from a specialized hernia center[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(2): 163-170.
[3]
Divya A, Shankar KMF, Kamal MF, et al. Factors associated with long-term outcomes of umbilical hernia repair[J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(5): 461-466.
[4]
Dabbas N, Adams K, Pearson K, et al. Frequency of abdominal wall hernias: is classical teaching out of date?[J]. JRSM Short Rep, 2011, 2(1): 5.
[5]
Helgstrand F, Jørgensen LN, Rosenberg J, et al. Nationwide prospective study on readmission after umbilical or epigastric hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2013, 17(4): 487-492.
[6]
Shankar DA, Itani K, O'Brien WJ, et al. Factors associated with long-term outcomes of umbilical hernia repair[J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(5): 461-466.
[7]
Henriksen NA, Montgomery A, Kaufmann R, et al. Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(3): 171-190.
[8]
李健文, 乐飞, 薛佩. 从原发性腹壁疝的含义和特点谈微创术式进展[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2023, 32(10): 1460-1468.
[9]
汤睿, 吴卫东, 周太成. 腹外疝手术学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019: 190-195.
[10]
Tang R, Jiang HY, Wu WD, et al. A preliminary multicenter evaluation of endoscopic sublay repair for ventral hernia from China[J]. BMC Surg, 2020, 20(1): 233.
[11]
Colavita PD, Belyansky I, Walters AL, et al. Umbilical hernia repair with mesh: identifying effectors of ideal outcomes[J]. Am J Surg, 2014, 208(3): 342-349.
[12]
Kulaçoğlu H. Current options in umbilical hernia repair in adult patients[J]. Ulus Cerrahi Derg, 2015, 31(3): 157-161.
[13]
孟云潇, 陈革, 李绍杰, 等. 开放式补片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝(附210例报告)[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2018, 23(4): 337-341.
[14]
Mehmood AM. Laparoscopic versus open repair of para-umbilical hernia. Is it a good alternative?[J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2015, 65(8): 865-868.
[15]
Awaiz A, Rahman F, Hossain MB, et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional hernia[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(3): 449-463.
[16]
Schwarz J, Reinpold W, Bittner R. Endoscopic mini/less open sublay technique(EMILOS)-a new technique for ventral hernia repair[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2017, 402(1): 173-180.
[17]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组, 吴卫东, 等. 单孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术规范化操作中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(1): 34-46.
[18]
Henriksen NA, Jorgensen LN, Friis-Andersen H, et al. Open versus laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair: nationwide data on short- and long-term outcomes[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(1): 526-532.
[19]
吴卫东, 王振林. 单孔Port技术在腹壁疝全腹膜外Sublay修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(1): 83-86.
[20]
Wang T, Tang R, Meng X, et al. Comparative review of outcomes: single-incision laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal sub-lay(SIL-TES) mesh repair versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh(IPOM) repair for ventral hernia[J]. Updates Surg, 2022, 74(3): 1117-1127.
[21]
Tang R, Wu W, Jiang H, et al. Employing a xiphoid-umbilicus approach in an endoscopic totally extraperitoneal procedure for the preperitoneal repair of midline ventral hernias[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2021, 31(6): 799-803.
[22]
李航宇, 顾岩, 王明刚, 等. 腹腔内补片修补术中国专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2022, 42(7): 721-729.
[23]
Conze J, Prescher A, Klinge U, et al. Pitfalls in retromuscular mesh repair for incisional hernia: the importance of the "fatty triangle" [J]. Hernia, 2004, 8(3): 255-259.
[24]
张一忠, 蒋会勇, 吴卫东. 下腹部腹膜前间隙辨析-鞘后视野下的膜解剖[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(4): 394-400.
[25]
司仙科, 王廷峰, 李英儒, 等. 单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术学习曲线的影响因素分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2023, 28(5): 359-364.
[1] 聂彬, 赵铁军, 于云宝, 李欢, 谢林峻. 单孔加一孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗乙状结肠癌的疗效与分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 330-333.
[2] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[3] 李绍杰, 谢奇峰, 李绍春, 杨子昂, 黄永刚, 陈吉彩, 杜舟, 王平, 张剑, 唐健雄. 复合基底膜生物补片应用于腹股沟疝Lichtenstein修补术的随机、对照、多中心临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 132-138.
[4] 曹桢, 刘子文. 医用胶在腹股沟疝中的临床研究进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 173-177.
[5] 陈传勤, 张凯, 单世涵, 陶亮, 傅巧美. 腹壁巨大切口疝修补术后早期疼痛的危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 178-183.
[6] 孙义元, 马洪升, 雷文章, 宋应寒. 日归手术管理模式下疝修补术的加速康复实践分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-41.
[7] 钟春林, 罗丹, 于颖娟, 杨可, 周燕, 张梅, 刘文. 腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术日间手术模式临床应用研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-49.
[8] 徐妙军, 唐黎明, 孙一峰. 腹股沟疝日间手术腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术与Lichtenstein术对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 56-60.
[9] 贵诗雨, 方向, 黄丹, 朱佳琳, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 腹膜前间隙补片修补对切口疝大鼠碱性成纤维生长因子（bFGF）的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-74.
[10] 李宝山, 王荫龙, 张新, 胡巍, 满艺. 腹腔镜下基于疝环缝合的生物补片经腹腹膜前修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 93-96.
[11] 吴恺明, 郝腾飞, 张庆元. MiniLap辅助两穿刺孔腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术10例分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 97-101.
[12] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[13] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[14] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[15] 满艺, 李宝山, 王荫龙. 机器人腹股沟疝修补术的现状与进展[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 62-64.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号