切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 184 -188. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.02.011

论著

耻脐入路单孔腹腔镜后鞘后技术在脐疝修补术中的应用
陈志升1, 司仙科1,(), 吴卫东2, 李森1, 杨佳华1, 李炜1, 郑侃1, 于昆1, 罗晓睿1, 葛卫红3   
  1. 1. 200062 上海中医药大学附属普陀医院微创外科
    2. 200080 上海交通大学医学院附属第一人民医院胃肠外科
    3. 215300 江苏省昆山市第五人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-28 出版日期:2024-04-18
  • 通信作者: 司仙科
  • 基金资助:
    上海中医药大学附属普陀医院百人计划(领航计划2022-RCLH-03)

Application of the supraumbilical single-port laparoscopic preperitoneal technique in umbilical hernia repair

Zhisheng Chen1, Xianke Si1,(), Weidong Wu2, Sen Li1, Jiahua Yang1, Wei Li1, Kan Zheng1, Kun Yu1, Xiaorui Luo1, Weihong Ge3   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200062, China
    2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
    3. Department of General Surgery, The Fifth People's Hospital of Kunshan City, Suzhou 215300, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2023-11-28 Published:2024-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Xianke Si
引用本文:

陈志升, 司仙科, 吴卫东, 李森, 杨佳华, 李炜, 郑侃, 于昆, 罗晓睿, 葛卫红. 耻脐入路单孔腹腔镜后鞘后技术在脐疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 184-188.

Zhisheng Chen, Xianke Si, Weidong Wu, Sen Li, Jiahua Yang, Wei Li, Kan Zheng, Kun Yu, Xiaorui Luo, Weihong Ge. Application of the supraumbilical single-port laparoscopic preperitoneal technique in umbilical hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 184-188.

目的

探讨耻脐入路单孔腹腔镜后鞘后修补术治疗脐疝的临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性研究2021年6月至2023年8月,上海中医药大学附属普陀医院微创外科收治的18例实施耻脐入路单孔腹腔镜后鞘后疝修补术的脐疝患者,根据临床病例资料、手术操作的技术细节及术后随访情况,分析该术式的临床效果及获益。

结果

18例患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开放手术,平均手术时间(106.67±28.49)min,术后6~8 h下床活动,术后8、24 h视觉模拟评分分别为2.94、2.50分,术后平均住院时间为(2.02±0.63)d;术后均无出血、肠梗阻、肠瘘、脐部坏死等严重并发症;随访时间为3~28个月,随访率100%,无复发。

结论

耻脐入路行单孔腹腔镜下后鞘后脐疝修补术安全可行,隐瘢痕效果好,术后疼痛轻,恢复快,可作为腹腔镜下脐疝修补的一种选择术式。

Objective

To explore the clinical application value of the supraumbilical single-port laparoscopic preperitoneal repair technique in the treatment of umbilical hernias.

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed 18 patients who underwent umbilical hernia repair using the supraumbilical single-port laparoscopic preperitoneal technique at the Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Putuo Hospital, affiliated with Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, from June 2021 to August 2023. The clinical outcomes and benefits were analyzed based on clinical data, technical details of the surgical procedure, and postoperative follow-up.

Results

All 18 patients successfully underwent surgery without conversion to open surgery. The average operation time was 106.67±28.49 minutes. Patients were encouraged to ambulate for 6 to 8 hours postoperatively. The visual analog scale scores at 8 and 24 hours postoperatively were 2.94 and 2.50, respectively. The average postoperative hospital stay was (2.02±0.63) days. There were no serious complications such as bleeding, intestinal obstruction, enterocutaneous fistula, or umbilical necrosis postoperatively. Follow-up periods ranged from 3 to 28 months, with a 100% follow-up rate and no recurrence observed.

Conclusion

The supraumbilical single-port laparoscopic preperitoneal umbilical hernia repair technique is safe and feasible, offering excellent cosmetic results with minimal scarring, less postoperative pain, and rapid recovery. It can be considered an alternative technique for laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair.

图9 术后瘢痕效果。
表1 实施耻脐入路单孔腹腔镜后鞘后修补术患者的术后随访资料[例(%)]
[1]
Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(4): 407-414.
[2]
Kulacoglu H, Yazicioglu D, Ozyaylali I. Prosthetic repair of umbilical hernias in adults with local anesthesia in a daycase setting: a comprehensive report from a specialized hernia center[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(2): 163-170.
[3]
Divya A, Shankar KMF, Kamal MF, et al. Factors associated with long-term outcomes of umbilical hernia repair[J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(5): 461-466.
[4]
Dabbas N, Adams K, Pearson K, et al. Frequency of abdominal wall hernias: is classical teaching out of date?[J]. JRSM Short Rep, 2011, 2(1): 5.
[5]
Helgstrand F, Jørgensen LN, Rosenberg J, et al. Nationwide prospective study on readmission after umbilical or epigastric hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2013, 17(4): 487-492.
[6]
Shankar DA, Itani K, O'Brien WJ, et al. Factors associated with long-term outcomes of umbilical hernia repair[J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(5): 461-466.
[7]
Henriksen NA, Montgomery A, Kaufmann R, et al. Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(3): 171-190.
[8]
李健文, 乐飞, 薛佩. 从原发性腹壁疝的含义和特点谈微创术式进展[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2023, 32(10): 1460-1468.
[9]
汤睿, 吴卫东, 周太成. 腹外疝手术学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019: 190-195.
[10]
Tang R, Jiang HY, Wu WD, et al. A preliminary multicenter evaluation of endoscopic sublay repair for ventral hernia from China[J]. BMC Surg, 2020, 20(1): 233.
[11]
Colavita PD, Belyansky I, Walters AL, et al. Umbilical hernia repair with mesh: identifying effectors of ideal outcomes[J]. Am J Surg, 2014, 208(3): 342-349.
[12]
Kulaçoğlu H. Current options in umbilical hernia repair in adult patients[J]. Ulus Cerrahi Derg, 2015, 31(3): 157-161.
[13]
孟云潇, 陈革, 李绍杰, 等. 开放式补片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝(附210例报告)[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2018, 23(4): 337-341.
[14]
Mehmood AM. Laparoscopic versus open repair of para-umbilical hernia. Is it a good alternative?[J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2015, 65(8): 865-868.
[15]
Awaiz A, Rahman F, Hossain MB, et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional hernia[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(3): 449-463.
[16]
Schwarz J, Reinpold W, Bittner R. Endoscopic mini/less open sublay technique(EMILOS)-a new technique for ventral hernia repair[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2017, 402(1): 173-180.
[17]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组, 吴卫东, 等. 单孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术规范化操作中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(1): 34-46.
[18]
Henriksen NA, Jorgensen LN, Friis-Andersen H, et al. Open versus laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair: nationwide data on short- and long-term outcomes[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(1): 526-532.
[19]
吴卫东, 王振林. 单孔Port技术在腹壁疝全腹膜外Sublay修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(1): 83-86.
[20]
Wang T, Tang R, Meng X, et al. Comparative review of outcomes: single-incision laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal sub-lay(SIL-TES) mesh repair versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh(IPOM) repair for ventral hernia[J]. Updates Surg, 2022, 74(3): 1117-1127.
[21]
Tang R, Wu W, Jiang H, et al. Employing a xiphoid-umbilicus approach in an endoscopic totally extraperitoneal procedure for the preperitoneal repair of midline ventral hernias[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2021, 31(6): 799-803.
[22]
李航宇, 顾岩, 王明刚, 等. 腹腔内补片修补术中国专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2022, 42(7): 721-729.
[23]
Conze J, Prescher A, Klinge U, et al. Pitfalls in retromuscular mesh repair for incisional hernia: the importance of the "fatty triangle" [J]. Hernia, 2004, 8(3): 255-259.
[24]
张一忠, 蒋会勇, 吴卫东. 下腹部腹膜前间隙辨析-鞘后视野下的膜解剖[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(4): 394-400.
[25]
司仙科, 王廷峰, 李英儒, 等. 单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术学习曲线的影响因素分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2023, 28(5): 359-364.
[1] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[2] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[9] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[10] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[11] 张锋, 孙孟奇, 方秀春. 静注右美托咪定、利多卡因对腹腔镜疝修补术患者围手术期心率、麻醉苏醒质量的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
[12] 何岩, 向文采. 七氟醚与异丙酚联合氯胺酮麻醉在疝修补术中的镇静镇痛效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[13] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[14] 刘明辉, 葛方明. MRI 对腹股沟疝修补术后患者早期并发症的评估价值研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 579-583.
[15] 孙昭, 刘琪, 王殿琛, 姜建武, 符洋. 机器人对比腹腔镜及开放式腹股沟疝修补术的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 588-598.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?