切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 628 -633. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.06.005

基础论著

腹腔内置疝修补补片动物实验的病理评价
焦昆1, 陈小菊2, 卢静1,()   
  1. 1. 100069 北京,首都医科大学实验动物部
    2. 213125 江苏省,常州市康蒂娜医疗科技有限公司
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-24 出版日期:2022-12-18
  • 通信作者: 卢静
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学横向课题基金(2018KJ000302)

Pathological evaluation of animal experiments with intraperitoneal abdominal hernia repair

Kun Jiao1, Xiaoju Chen2, Jing Lu1,()   

  1. 1. Laboratory Animal Department, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
    2. Condiner Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Changzhou 213125, China
  • Received:2022-01-24 Published:2022-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Jing Lu
引用本文:

焦昆, 陈小菊, 卢静. 腹腔内置疝修补补片动物实验的病理评价[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 628-633.

Kun Jiao, Xiaoju Chen, Jing Lu. Pathological evaluation of animal experiments with intraperitoneal abdominal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(06): 628-633.

目的

以满足《腹腔内置疝修补补片动物实验技术审查指导原则》要求为基础,探讨客观、准确的病理检测指标和评价方法。

方法

选取两种复合疝修补补片,分别植入犬腹腔内左右两侧腹壁。12周后将补片植入区域连同周围正常组织取材,采用免疫组织化学及免疫荧光染色方法评价新生腹膜比例、炎性反应;采用Masson染色方法检测纤维化程度;采用HE染色方法检测新生血管和脂肪浸润情况。

结果

(1)Cytokeratin和Vimentin两种抗体均可以对间皮细胞进行识别,有助于对新生腹膜层长度的测量,Cytokeratin特异性更高;(2)应用抗体CD20、CD3和CD68免疫组化染色可以高效地检测出组织中B淋巴细胞、T淋巴细胞和巨噬细胞,辅助细胞计数和炎性反应评分;(3)CD34免疫组化染色观察新生血管情况并计算新生血管密度;(4)HE染色可以直接观察脂肪细胞浸润情况并进行半定量评分;(5)Masson染色可以清晰直观地反应胶原纤维沉积情况,对纤维沉积区域厚度进行测量、比较有辅助作用;(6)2组补片的所有观察指标通过定量和半定量方法进行描述,随后进行统计分析,结果显示所有指标间均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。

结论

本研究采用的检测方法能对补片植入后的局部反应相关指标进行直接、准确的定位和量化,基本满足《腹腔内置疝修补补片动物实验技术审查指导原则》的要求,对今后开展相关实验具有一定的参考价值。

Objective

To explore objective and accurate pathological detection indexes and evaluation methods based on the requirements of "Guidelines for technical review of intraperitoneal hernia repair mesh in animal experiments" .

Methods

Two kinds of composite hernia patches were implanted in the abdominal wall of dogs. After 12 weeks, the patch area and surrounding normal tissues were sampled, and the proportion of peritoneal mesothelial cells, the inflammatory response, and neovascularization were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining. The degree of fibrosis was detected by Masson staining. Fat infiltration was detected by HE staining.

Results

(1) Both Cytokeratin and Vimentin could accurately identify mesothelial cells, which is helpful to measure the length of mesothelial cell layer; (2) Using antibodies CD20, CD3 and CD68 could effectively detect B lymphocytes, T lymphocytes and macrophages in tissues; (3) Using CD34 antibody could be used to observe the situation and calculate the density of neovascularization. (4) HE staining could be used for observe the infiltration of adipocytes and semi-quantitative analysis; (5) Masson staining could clearly reflect the deposition of collagen fiber, and the thickness of the fiber deposition area was measured and compared; (6) All observation indicators of the two groups were compared by quantitative and semi-quantitative methods, and there was no significant difference (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The detection method adopted in this study could directly and accurately locate and quantify the indicators of local response, which basically met the requirements of "Guidelines for technical review of intraperitoneal hernia repair mesh in animal experiments" , and has a certain reference value for future relevant experiments.

图1 HE和免疫组化方法评价2组补片新生腹膜情况注:箭头所示为新生腹膜位置(×400)
图2 2组补片炎性细胞浸润评价注:箭头所示为阳性细胞位置(×400)
图3 新生血管、纤维沉积和脂肪细胞浸润结果注:3a,3b:CD34染色结果,箭头位置为新生血管(×400);3d,3e:Masson染色结果,蓝染区域为胶原纤维沉积区域(×50);3g,3h:HE染色结果,边形区域为脂肪细胞浸润区域(×20);3c,3f,3i:统计结果。
[1]
Patel NG, Ratanshi I, Buchel EW. The Best of Abdominal Wall Reconstruction[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 141(1): 113e-136e.
[2]
李金龙, 田丹, 刘宇, 等. 标准聚丙烯补片与部分可吸收补片在腹股沟疝腹膜前修补术中的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 298-301.
[3]
李绍春, 顾岩, 胡星辰, 等. 不同聚丙烯补片在成人腹股沟疝修补术中的应用价值[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(7): 767-772.
[4]
Lockhart K, Dunn D, Teo S, et al. Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 9(9): CD011517..
[5]
刘静, 申英末, 陈杰, 等. 不同类型脱细胞基质材料生物补片在青少年腹股沟疝修补术中的应用价值[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(7): 773-778.
[6]
Achelrod D, Stargardt T. Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Heavy-Weight and Light-Weight Mesh in Laparoscopic Surgery for Unilateral Inguinal Hernias[J]. Appl Health Econ Health Policy, 2014, 12(2): 151-163.
[7]
李天任, 邵安良, 魏利娜, 等. 医疗器械临床前动物试验研究的考虑要点[J]. 中国药事, 2019, 33(10): 1121-1128.
[8]
Baptista ML, Bonsack ME, Felemovicius I, et al. Abdominal adhesions to prosthetic mesh evaluated by laparoscopy and electron microscopy[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2000, 190(3): 271-280.
[9]
Mutsaers SE, Pixley FJ, Prêle CM, et al. Mesothelial cells regulate immune responses in health and disease: role for immunotherapy in malignant mesothelioma[J]. Curr Opin Immunol, 2020, 64: 88-109.
[10]
杨晓锋, 叶小龙, 黄江龙, 等. 纳米仿生防粘连复合补片修复大鼠腹壁缺损中胶原合成功能的研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 14-21.
[11]
Milne EM, Piviani M, Hodgkiss Geere HM, et al. Comparison of effusion cell block and biopsy immunohistochemistry in mesothelial hyperplasia, mesothelioma, and carcinoma in dogs[J]. Vet Clin Pathol, 2021, 50(4): 555-567.
[12]
Frazão LP, Vieira De Castro J, Neves NM. In Vivo Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of Biomaterial Device[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2020, 1250:109-124.
[13]
张荣妍, 李超婧, 王富军, 等. 高分子类移植材料的理化特性对异物反应的调控[J]. 生物医学工程与临床, 2021, 25(6): 773-779.
[14]
Liu Z, Wei N, Tang R. Functionalized Strategies and Mechanisms of the Emerging Mesh for Abdominal Wall Repair and Regeneration[J]. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2021, 7(6): 2064-2082.
[15]
Lee EJ, Kim M, Kim HS, et al. CD3 and CD20 Immunohistochemical Staining Patterns of Bone Marrow-Infiltrating Malignant Lymphoma Cells[J]. Ann Clin Lab Sci, 2017, 47(2): 136-143.
[16]
Wang PH, Huang BS, Horng HC, et al. Wound healing[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2018, 81(2): 94-101.
[17]
Pineda Molina C, Giglio R, Gandhi RM, et al. Comparison of the host macrophage response to synthetic and biologic surgical meshes used for ventral hernia repair[J]. J Immunol Regen Med, 2019, 3: 13-25.
[18]
杨春. 部分可吸收聚丙烯补片结合医用胶对疝修补术的研究[D]. 成都:电子科技大学, 2020.
[19]
Keating JH, Melidone R, Garcia-Polite F, et al. Preclinical Evaluation of Mesh Implants: The Pathologist’s Perspective[J]. Toxicol Pathol, 2019, 47(3): 379-389.
[20]
伍月, 李昆, 张岩, 等. 脂肪组织促进伤口愈合的研究进展[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2019, 33(6): 756-761.
[21]
高国栋, 黄永刚, 吴浩, 等. 脂肪干细胞覆膜聚丙烯补片在大鼠体内的生物相容性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(6): 401-404.
[22]
Godenèche AM, Elia FM, Kempf JMP, et al. Fatty infiltration of stage 1 or higher significantly compromises long-term healing of supraspinatus repairs[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2017, 26(10): 1818-1825.
[1] 武玺宁, 张培培, 齐振红, 张璟, 赵瑞娜, 孟华, 李建初. 腹膜后神经鞘瘤的超声诊断质量及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 701-704.
[2] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[3] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[4] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[5] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[6] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[7] 李炳根, 龚独辉, 赖泽如, 聂向阳. 产后腹直肌分离全腔镜下肌后/腹膜外补片修补术的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 724-727.
[8] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[9] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[10] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[13] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[14] 岳瑞雪, 孔令欣, 郝鑫, 杨进强, 韩猛, 崔国忠, 王建军, 张志生, 孔凡庭, 张维, 何文博, 李现桥, 周新平, 徐东宏, 胡崇珠. 乳腺癌HER2蛋白表达水平预测新辅助治疗疗效的真实世界研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 765-770.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要