Application of holistic nursing intervention in high ligation of indirect inguinal hernia in children

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.03.023

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the application of holistic nursing intervention in high ligation of indirect inguinal hernia in children.

Methods

The clinical data of 114 children who underwent high ligation of indirect inguinal hernia in the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang City between June 2021 and June 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Children receiving routine nursing from June to December 2021 were defined as the control group (n=57), and those receiving holistic nursing intervention from January to June 2022 were defined as the observation group (n=57). Postoperative recovery, compliance, pain degree and quality of life of the two groups were comparatively analyzed.

Results

The intestinal exhaust time and recovery time of the two groups were close (P>0.05). The hospital stay of the observation group was shorter as compared with the control group (P<0.05). After intervention, Frankl scale scores and the pediatric quality of life inventory TM version 4.0 (PedsQLTM 4.0) scores increased, and the observation group had higher scorers as compared with the control group (P<0.05). The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Behavioral Tool (FLACC) scores decreased, and the observation group had lower scores as compared with the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Holistic nursing can significantly shorten hospital stay, improve compliance, relieve pain and improve quality of life of children undergoing high ligation of indirect inguinal hernia.

Key words: Holistic nursing, Child, Hernia, inguinal, Hernial sac, High ligation

Zilin Cheng, Ming Dai, Jianhua Li, Liang Ma. Application of holistic nursing intervention in high ligation of indirect inguinal hernia in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 341-345.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhshfbwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.03.023

https://zhshfbwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2023/V17/I03/341

Figures/Tables 5

References 21

[1]	Van der Veeken L, Vergote S, Kunpalin Y, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2022, 42(3): 318-329.
[2]	赛福丁·司马义, 早木来提古丽·吐尔逊, 阿丽娅吉, 等. 新疆地区儿童腹股沟斜疝发病率与手术率及自然治愈流行病学调查研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2022, 21(9): 1201-1206.
[3]	王凤南, 李进男, 蒙英华. 家庭参与护理模式对小儿疝气手术患儿的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2021, 27(4): 108-111.
[4]	李秋菊, 黄丽慧. 整体护理在腹腔镜下小儿腹股沟疝手术中的应用[J]. 河北医学, 2011, 17(3): 408-410.
[5]	魏谨颐, 陈琰. 前瞻性护理教育对腹腔镜小儿疝气手术患儿依从性、术后恢复的影响[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2021, 41(11): 2650-2656.
[6]	Crellin DJ, Harrison D, Santamaria N, et al. Systematic review of the face, legs, activity, cry and consolability scale for assessing pain in infants and children: is itreliable, valid, and feasible for use?[J]. Pain, 2015, 156(11): 2132-2151.
[7]	成艾, 孙瑛, 龙烨. 视听转移联合积极共情反馈在小儿疝气手术护理中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2022, 28(18): 89-92.
[8]	曹羽, 龚航军, 韩刚, 等. 单侧腹股沟斜疝完全剥离疝囊术和横断疝囊术治疗的效果观察[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2022, 27(4): 497-500.
[9]	常晓华, 关丽娜, 李丹, 等. 父母陪伴下多元化兴趣诱导联合语言唤醒对腹股沟斜疝患儿麻醉配合度、焦虑及苏醒的影响[J]. 国际精神病学杂志, 2022, 49(1): 168-171.
[10]	Priyadarshini K, Behera BK, Tripathy BB, et al. Ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block, ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block, and quadratus lumborum block for elective open inguinal hernia repair in children: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2022, 47(4): 217-221.
[11]	Zhang ZQ, Zhou YL, Pan ZB, et al. Application of Noncontact Laparoscopic High Ligation of the Hernia Sac of the Vas Deferens in Children with Indirect Inguinal Hernia[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2022, 32(10): 1121-1125.
[12]	赵静, 胡花清, 何婷. 医护一体化工作模式在小儿腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜围术期中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2022, 28(22): 87-89.
[13]	赵海蓉, 周雪梅. 系统化整体护理在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(5): 473-476.
[14]	孙叶飞, 陈晓晨. 腹腔镜下腹股沟嵌顿疝修补术全程护理干预效果[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2020, 49(1): 84-87.
[15]	魏谨颐, 陈琰. 前瞻性护理教育对腹腔镜小儿疝气手术患儿依从性、术后恢复的影响[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2021, 41(11): 2650-2656.
[16]	杨福全. 腹壁疝修补术后疼痛预防及处理[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(7): 778-780.
[17]	朱琳, 曲宏懿. 应用儿童疼痛行为量表比较腹腔镜与开放小儿腹股沟斜疝手术术后疼痛[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(7): 509-511.
[18]	成艾, 孙瑛, 龙烨. 视听转移联合积极共情反馈在小儿疝气手术护理中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2022, 28(18): 89-92.
[19]	王莹, 杜易芳. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术后系统化整体护理效果观察[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2015(11): 1311-1313.
[20]	Sessanna L, Askew YD, Pomeroy SH. Faith Community Nursing Practice and Holistic Nursing Practice: A Comprehensive and Inclusive Comparison of Both Specialties[J]. J Holist Nurs, 2021, 39(1): 85-102.
[21]	王祎. 疝气无张力修补术的手术配合及护理措施探讨[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(S02): 334-336.

组别	例数	性别[例(%)]		年龄(岁)	病程(月)	体重(kg)	身高(cm)	疝囊体积(mm³)
组别	例数	男	女	年龄(岁)	病程(月)	体重(kg)	身高(cm)	疝囊体积(mm³)
对照组	57	52(91.23)	5(8.77)	3.18±1.03	3.65±1.25	15.16±4.22	93.42±10.36	11 534.48±2541.66
观察组	57	50(87.72)	7(12.28)	3.24±1.16	3.59±1.18	14.87±4.39	94.77±10.58	12 170.15±2187.94
χ²/t		0.373		0.292	0.264	0.360	0.688	1.431
P		0.542		0.771	0.793	0.720	0.493	0.155

组别	例数	性别[例(%)]		年龄(岁)	病程(月)	体重(kg)	身高(cm)	疝囊体积(mm³)
组别	例数	男	女	年龄(岁)	病程(月)	体重(kg)	身高(cm)	疝囊体积(mm³)
对照组	57	52(91.23)	5(8.77)	3.18±1.03	3.65±1.25	15.16±4.22	93.42±10.36	11 534.48±2541.66
观察组	57	50(87.72)	7(12.28)	3.24±1.16	3.59±1.18	14.87±4.39	94.77±10.58	12 170.15±2187.94
χ²/t		0.373		0.292	0.264	0.360	0.688	1.431
P		0.542		0.771	0.793	0.720	0.493	0.155

组别	例数	肠道排气时间(h)	苏醒时间(min)	住院时间(d)
对照组	57	12.15±2.26	34.12±5.86	4.39±1.41
观察组	57	11.93±2.37	33.98±5.69	3.57±1.33
t		0.507	0.129	3.194
P		0.613	0.897	0.002

组别	例数	肠道排气时间(h)	苏醒时间(min)	住院时间(d)
对照组	57	12.15±2.26	34.12±5.86	4.39±1.41
观察组	57	11.93±2.37	33.98±5.69	3.57±1.33
t		0.507	0.129	3.194
P		0.613	0.897	0.002

组别	例数	干预前	干预后	t	P
对照组	57	2.05±0.58	2.86±0.26	9.621	<0.001
观察组	57	2.11±0.63	3.13±0.31	10.968	<0.001
t		0.529	5.038
P		0.598	<0.001

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export