Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02): 155-159. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.02.015

Special Issue:

• Clinical Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical study of application of the self-gripping mesh in the repair of inguinal hernia under local anesthesia and epidural anesthesia

Changshan Rong1,(), Pingjuan Wang2   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Anhui No.2 Provincial People's Hospital, Hefei 230022, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, Anhui No.2 Provincial People's Hospital, Hefei 230022, China
  • Received:2019-11-12 Online:2020-04-18 Published:2020-04-18
  • Contact: Changshan Rong
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wing Longshan, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To study the clinical effect of the application of the self-gripping mesh for inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia and epidural anesthesia.

Methods

The clinical data of 100 patients treated by using the self-gripping mesh in the Anhui No.2 Provincial People's Hospital between February 2014 and October 2018 were retrospectively collected. They were divided into the local anesthesia group (n=80) and the epidural anesthesia group (n=20). The postoperative operation index, pain score, hospitalization index, postoperative complications and recurrence were compared between the two groups. And the levels of inflammatory factors before operation and 1 week after operation were compared between the two groups. The measurement data are expressed using (±s) and compared using t tests. The counting data are represented by frequency, compared χ2 tests or Fisher tests.

Results

The operation time of the local anesthesia group was longer than that of the epidural anesthesia group, and the leaving bed time and eat time of the local anesthesia group was shorter than those of the epidural anesthesia group, with significant differences (P<0.05). The postoperative 4 h visual analogue scale scores of the two groups had no statistical difference (P>0.05), and the hospital stay and cost in the local anesthesia group were less than those of the epidural anesthesia group, with significant differences (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative urine retention in the local anesthesia group was lower than that of the epidural anesthesia group, with significant differences (P<0.05). However, the postoperative incision infection rate and the postoperative recurrence rate of the two groups were not statistically different (P>0.05). At 1 week after operation, the levels of interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α in the two groups decreased, and those of the local anesthesia group was lower than those of the epidural anesthesia group, with significant differences (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The application of the self-gripping mesh in the inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia can effectively inhibit the early postoperative inflammatory reaction of the patient, promote the postoperative rehabilitation, and also can reduce the treatment burden of the patient, reduce the occurrence of the urine retention, and the pain-relieving effect of the two patients is comparable, which is worth for clinical promotion.

Key words: Hernia, inguinal, Local anesthesia, Self-gripping mesh, Inflammatory factor, Pain, Complications

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-68665919 E-mail: zhshfbwkzz@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd