切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (01) : 19 -25. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.01.004

论著

基于多层螺旋CT影像学特征与高频超声鉴别成人腹股沟斜疝、直疝的临床价值
张亚琼1, 李香1,(), 唐芳芳1, 曹治平1, 雷斌2, 马宇宇3   
  1. 1719000 陕西,榆林市中医医院影像科
    2719000 陕西,榆林市中医医院普外科
    3719000 陕西,榆林市中医医院检验科
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-26 出版日期:2026-02-18
  • 通信作者: 李香
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省中医药管理局2024年度市级中医医院中医药科研能力提升项目(SZY-NLTL-2024-028)

Clinical value of multislice spiral CT imaging features and high-frequency ultrasonography in differentiating adult indirect and direct inguinal hernias

Yaqiong Zhang1, Xiang Li1,(), Fangfang Tang1, Zhiping Cao1, Bin Lei2, Yuyu Ma3   

  1. 1Department of Imaging, Yulin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yulin 719000, Shaanxi Province, China
    2Department of General Surgery, Yulin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yulin 719000, Shaanxi Province, China
    3Department of Laboratory, Yulin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yulin 719000, Shaanxi Province, China
  • Received:2025-09-26 Published:2026-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Xiang Li
引用本文:

张亚琼, 李香, 唐芳芳, 曹治平, 雷斌, 马宇宇. 基于多层螺旋CT影像学特征与高频超声鉴别成人腹股沟斜疝、直疝的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 19-25.

Yaqiong Zhang, Xiang Li, Fangfang Tang, Zhiping Cao, Bin Lei, Yuyu Ma. Clinical value of multislice spiral CT imaging features and high-frequency ultrasonography in differentiating adult indirect and direct inguinal hernias[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(01): 19-25.

目的

基于多层螺旋CT(MSCT)影像学特征与高频超声鉴别成人腹股沟斜疝、直疝的临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析2020年1月至2024年12月榆林市中医医院收治的腹股沟区出现包块的125例患者的临床资料,并行疝腹腔镜修补术。以外科疝腹腔镜修补术探查结果为金标准,所有患者均接受MSCT检查和高频超声检查。分析MSCT、高频超声对腹股沟疝的诊断价值;分析MSCT、高频超声对腹股沟斜疝、直疝的诊断价值;比较腹股沟斜疝、直疝的MSCT位置特点、影像学征象;比较腹股沟斜疝、直疝高频超声影像学征象;比较腹股沟斜疝、直疝疝内容物检出情况。

结果

MSCT诊断腹股沟疝灵敏度、特异度分别为97.79%、80.00%,kappa值为0.652;高频超声诊断腹股沟疝灵敏度、特异度分别为96.32%、80.00%,kappa值为0.551。MSCT用于斜疝诊断,灵敏度97.00%、特异度94.44%,kappa值为0.906,用于直疝诊断,灵敏度94.44%、特异度97.00%,kappa值为0.906。高频超声诊断斜疝灵敏度、特异度分别为92.00%、88.89%,kappa值为0.781,诊断直疝灵敏度、特异度分别为88.89%、92.00%,kappa值为0.781。腹股沟斜疝混杂密度或为囊实性,均分布于腹股沟韧带前侧,位于腹壁下动脉外侧,没有新月征、股三角填塞表现;直疝均分布于腹股沟韧带前侧,位于腹壁下动脉内侧,没有股三角填塞表现,多见外侧新月征。斜疝疝囊位于腹壁下动脉起始段外侧,疝环直径及形态差异较大;直疝可见疝囊位于腹壁下动脉内侧,局部腹壁未发生显著改变,肠壁层次清晰,无明显疝囊颈,部分患者疝囊腔中可探及少量液性暗区,疝环位于腹壁下血管内侧,肠壁有少量的彩色血流信号。斜疝内容物占比依次为肠管、大网膜、卵巢、积液、腹腔内脂肪、膀胱;直疝内容物占比依次为肠管、腹腔内脂肪、大网膜、积液、卵巢、脂肪、膀胱;经Bonferroni校正(校正后显著性水准为P<0.008 3),2组在所有内容物的检出率上,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.008 3)。

结论

基于MSCT影像学特征与高频超声鉴别成人腹股沟斜疝、直疝均具有重要临床价值。MSCT可通过确认是否存在特异性影像学征象,并结合疝囊颈与腹壁下动脉的关系,为腹股沟疝的分型提供依据。高频超声可实时动态评估疝内容物的可复性,对于临床分型具有重要指导意义。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical value of multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) imaging features and high-frequency ultrasound in differentiating indirect and direct inguinal hernias in adults.

Methods

Clinical data of 125 patients presenting with an inguinal mass and admitted to Yulin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2020 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent laparoscopic hernia repair. Intraoperative findings during laparoscopic exploration were used as the reference standard. All patients received MSCT and high-frequency ultrasonography. The diagnostic performance of MSCT and high-frequency ultrasonography for inguinal hernia was evaluated, as well as their performance in diagnosing indirect and direct inguinal hernias. MSCT location characteristics and imaging signs, high-frequency ultrasonographic findings, and the detection of hernia contents were compared between indirect and direct inguinal hernias.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of MSCT in diagnosing inguinal hernias were 97.79% and 80.00%, respectively, with a kappa value of 0.652. The sensitivity and specificity of high-frequency ultrasound in diagnosing inguinal hernias were 96.32% and 80.00%, respectively, with a kappa value of 0.551. For the diagnosis of indirect hernias, MSCT had a sensitivity of 97.00% and a specificity of 94.44%, with a kappa value of 0.906; for the diagnosis of direct hernias, MSCT had a sensitivity of 94.44% and a specificity of 97.00%, with a kappa value of 0.906. High-frequency ultrasound had a sensitivity of 92.00% and a specificity of 88.89% for diagnosing indirect hernias, with a kappa value of 0.781, and a sensitivity of 88.89% and a specificity of 92.00% for diagnosing direct hernias, with a kappa value of 0.781. Indirect inguinal hernias presented with mixed density or were cystic-solid, all distributed on the anterior side of the inguinal ligament and lateral to the inferior epigastric artery, without a crescent sign or filling of the femoral triangle. Direct hernias were all distributed on the anterior side of the inguinal ligament and medial to the inferior epigastric artery, without filling of the femoral triangle, and often with a lateral crescent sign. The indirect hernia sac was located lateral to the origin of the inferior epigastric artery, and the diameter and shape of the hernia ring varied greatly. The direct hernia sac was located medial to the inferior epigastric artery, with no significant changes in the local abdominal wall, clear intestinal wall layers, no obvious hernia sac neck, and a small amount of fluid dark area could be detected in the hernia sac cavity of some patients. The hernia ring was located medial to the inferior epigastric vessels, and there was a small amount of color blood flow signal in the intestinal wall. The proportions of contents in indirect hernias were, in descending order: intestinal canal, greater omentum, ovary, effusion, intra-abdominal fat, and bladder. The proportions of contents in direct hernias were, in descending order: intestinal canal, intra-abdominal fat, greater omentum, effusion, ovary, fat, and bladder. After Bonferroni correction (corrected significance level of P<0.0083), there were no statistically significant differences in the detection rates of all contents between the two groups (all P>0.0083).

Conclusion

Both MSCT imaging features and high-frequency ultrasound have important clinical value in differentiating indirect and direct inguinal hernias in adults. MSCT can provide a basis for the classification of inguinal hernias by confirming the presence of specific imaging signs and combining the relationship between the hernia sac neck and the inferior epigastric artery. High-frequency ultrasound can dynamically assess the reducibility of hernia contents in real time, which is of great guiding significance for clinical classification.

表1 MSCT、高频超声诊断腹股沟疝的结果(侧)
表2 MSCT、高频超声诊断腹股沟斜疝、直疝的结果(侧)
图1 斜疝患者MSCT重建图像 1A为左侧腹股沟斜疝横断面成像图像;1B为右侧腹股沟斜疝冠状面成像图像;1C为右侧腹股沟斜疝矢状面成像图像注:1A为病例1,患者男,63岁,左侧腹股沟区混杂密度肿块疝出,疝囊颈位于腹壁下动脉外侧,术中诊断为左侧腹股沟斜疝;1B、1C为病例2,患者男,45岁,右侧腹股沟区肿块,冠状位重建可以看到腹股沟浅环扩张,内容物从中疝出,疝囊颈位于腹股沟韧带上方,术中诊断为右侧腹股沟斜疝。MSCT为多层螺旋CT。
图2 直疝患者MSCT重建图像 2A为右侧腹股沟直疝横断面成像图像;2B为右侧腹股沟直疝冠状面成像图像;2C为右侧腹股沟直疝矢状面成像图像注:2A、2B、2C均为同一病例,患者女,37岁,右侧腹股沟区囊样包块,疝囊颈位于腹壁下动脉内侧,未见肠袢填充其中,按压不消失,术中诊断为右侧腹股沟直疝。MSCT为多层螺旋CT。
表3 腹股沟斜疝、直疝MSCT位置特点、影像学征象(侧)
图3 斜疝患者高频超声图像注:患者男,57岁,右侧腹股沟混合回声包块,疝口内径约9 mm,平卧位包块可回纳入腹腔,术中诊断为右侧腹股沟斜疝。
图4 直疝患者高频超声图像注:患者男,68岁,腹腔加压探及右侧腹股沟混合回声包块,疝口内径约19 mm,疝囊位于腹壁下动脉内侧,去除腹压包块不能完全回纳腹腔,术中诊断为右侧腹股沟直疝。
表4 腹股沟疝内容物检出情况[侧(%)]
[1]
陈双, 唐健雄, 周太成, 等. 腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2025, 45(2): 121-127.
[2]
Rosenberg J, Baig S, Chen DC, et al. Groin hernia[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2025, 11(1): 47.
[3]
中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组, 中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 陈双, 等. 腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2025, 34(3): 409-417.
[4]
Shakil A, Aparicio K, Barta E, et al. Inguinal hernias: diagnosis and management[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2020, 102(8): 487-492.
[5]
周兆欣, 张斌. 高频彩色多普勒超声对腹股沟斜疝及疝内容物的诊断研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(3): 296-299.
[6]
Shemyatovsky KA, Azimov RH, Alekhin AI, et al. Computed tomography options in the evaluation of hernia repair outcomes using "titanium silk" mesh implants[J]. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2020, 14(5): 684-689.
[7]
朱止平, 窦文广, 岳军艳, 等. 成人腹股沟斜疝与直疝和股疝的多排螺旋CT检查影像学特征[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(11): 1127-1133.
[8]
陈家英. 腹股沟疝的CT分型[D]. 天津: 天津医科大学, 2021.
[9]
唐春燕, 吴灵兰, 黄贻琼, 等. 术前高频超声检查腹股沟斜疝与直疝的诊断价值探讨[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(3): 248-251.
[10]
贾传新, 吕亮宏, 吕忠船. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与李金斯坦术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床对比研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(5): 386-388.
[11]
张霞, 韩江博, 濮苗, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效及对炎症介质、氧化应激、疼痛介质的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2024, 23(4): 405-409.
[12]
Miller J, Tregarthen A, Saouaf R, et al. Radiologic reporting and interpretation of occult inguinal hernia[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2018, 227(5): 489-495.
[13]
齐大鹏, 计朝飞, 王晓亮, 等. 多排螺旋CT对腹股沟疝患者的影像鉴别与诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(2): 146-149.
[14]
蒋智明, 徐恩, 夏雪峰, 等. 超声对隐匿性腹股沟疝的诊断价值[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2020, 34(7): 726-727.
[15]
杨娅, 蒋锐, 肖瑜, 等. 多层螺旋CT在腹股沟疝患者手术中的临床意义[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2021, 36(12): 1645-1648.
[16]
宋庆杰, 朱泓宇, 宋辉, 等. 多层螺旋CT在腹股沟疝术前诊断及分型中的应用[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2025, 34(5): 401-404.
[17]
郑学裕, 李育智, 王超, 等. 高频超声诊断腹股沟疝的影像学特征与手术结果符合率分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(2): 185-188.
[1] 张婉佳, 梁彤, 涂滨, 王丹郁. 高频超声应用于肱二头肌远端肌腱损伤的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(10): 976-981.
[2] 张硕, 袁建军, 崔明哲, 丁晓, 吴铭, 郭艳艳, 彭会娟, 秦亚飞, 陈晨, 朱好辉. 基于高频超声与剪切波弹性成像评估继发性淋巴水肿患者术后疗效的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(06): 547-555.
[3] 阳敏, 廖江秀, 章国智, 张晔, 范林军. 常规超声联合临床特征对甲状腺微小乳头状癌中央区淋巴结转移的术前诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 396-400.
[4] 张腾花, 尚培中, 王晓梅, 李晓武, 王金, 苗建军, 刘冰. 外伤性脾破裂三阶梯分层治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-512.
[5] 杨小栎, 李万富, 马柱, 马兰, 郑义, 付晓丽, 王晶. 钳式针一步法在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 535-538.
[6] 王华, 曹素娥, 吴建杰, 狄金明. 膀胱炎性肌纤维母细胞瘤四例诊治报告并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 547-552.
[7] 罗云, 王伟. 腹直肌悬吊法与耻骨梳韧带缝合法处理腹股沟直疝假性疝囊的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 663-667.
[8] 赵静. 高频超声对腹股沟斜疝的诊断价值研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-578.
[9] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[10] 孙雅娟, 杨柳, 徐婧梅, 谭明超, 刘寰. 肺黏液表皮样癌的CT 影像特征分析—附4 例报告[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 491-493.
[11] 钱春蕊, 周燕, 张晶, 蔡笃财, 门慧, 王松海, 黎莉, 邢龙. 高分辨率CT 与多层螺旋CT 在肺结节及早期肺癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 827-830.
[12] 姜萌, 韩高飞, 党玲. 多层螺旋CT灌注参数联合血清miR-92a-3p、miR-361-5p对重症急性胰腺炎的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 511-516.
[13] 惠焕焕, 张育苗, 付淼, 胡君凤. MSCTA、NLR及三种评分系统对肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血患者预后的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 340-346.
[14] 张海玲, 陈丹丹, 朱季军, 王晓燕, 张诗琪. 多层螺旋CT联合血清miR-17检测预测胃癌淋巴结转移风险的效果[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 23-28.
[15] 毛程璐, 徐运. 脑小血管病与步态和平衡功能障碍相关性的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 267-273.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?