切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 223 -227. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.02.019

论著

七氟烷吸入复合瑞芬太尼麻醉在小儿腹腔镜疝修补术中的效果
郭建丽1, 珠娜1, 宋飞1, 柴国东2,()   
  1. 1. 017000 内蒙古,鄂尔多斯市中心医院麻醉科
    2. 010000 呼和浩特,内蒙古自治区妇幼保健院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-01 出版日期:2024-04-18
  • 通信作者: 柴国东

Application effect of sevoflurane inhalation combined with remifentanil anesthesia in laparoscopic hernia repair in children

Jianli Guo1, Na Zhu1, Fei Song1, Guodong Chai2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Ordos Center Hospital, Ordos, Inner Mongolia 017000, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, Inner Mongolia Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Hohhot 010000, China
  • Received:2023-04-01 Published:2024-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Guodong Chai
引用本文:

郭建丽, 珠娜, 宋飞, 柴国东. 七氟烷吸入复合瑞芬太尼麻醉在小儿腹腔镜疝修补术中的效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 223-227.

Jianli Guo, Na Zhu, Fei Song, Guodong Chai. Application effect of sevoflurane inhalation combined with remifentanil anesthesia in laparoscopic hernia repair in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 223-227.

目的

探究七氟烷吸入复合瑞芬太尼麻醉在小儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果。

方法

选取2020年6月至2022年12月,鄂尔多斯市中心医院收治的100例行小儿腹股沟疝修补术患者,随机数字表法将患儿分为对照组与观察组,各50例。2组患儿均接受腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗,对照组患儿予以丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼麻醉,观察组患儿予以七氟烷吸入复合瑞芬太尼麻醉。比较2组患儿入室前(T0)、切皮时(T1)、手术开始5 min(T2)、10 min(T3)及术毕即刻(T4)的血流动力学指标[心率、平均动脉压(MAP)],术前、术后的应激指标[皮质醇、促肾上腺糖皮质激素(ACTH)、C反应蛋白(CRP)]变化,术后6、12、24、48 h疼痛程度(NRS评分法)、Ramsay镇静量表评分(RSS),以及躁动情况。

结果

与T0时刻比较,对照组在T1、T2、T3时的心率均显著降低(P<0.05),而观察组T1、T2、T3、T4时刻的心率变化不明显(P>0.05)。2组患者的心率水平比较,差异有统计学意义(F组间=446.800,P组间<0.001;F时间=62.220,P时间<0.001;F交互=63.960,P交互<0.001)。与T0时刻比较,对照组T1、T2、T3、T4各时刻的MAP降低(P<0.05),观察组T1、T2、T3、T4各时刻的MAP变化不明显(P>0.05),2组患者MAP水平比较,差异有统计学意义(F组间=62.540,P组间<0.001;F时间=9.275,P时间<0.001;F交互=9.614,P交互<0.001)。术后2组患者的皮质醇、ACTH及CRP均显著升高(P<0.05),且对照组更高(P<0.05)。对照组术后6、12、24、48 h NRS评分均高于观察组(F组间= 434.100,P组间<0.001;F时间=1.435,P时间=0.232;F交互=2.263,P交互=0.081);2组患儿术后各时间段RSS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(F组间=0.221,P组间=0.639;F时间=2.201,P时间=0.088;F交互= 0.669,P交互=0.572)。2组患儿躁动发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

小儿腹股沟疝修补术应用七氟烷复合瑞芬太尼麻醉利于患儿血流动力学平衡,降低患儿应激反应。

Objective

To investigate the application effect of sevoflurane inhalation combined with remifentanil anesthesia in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children.

Methods

100 children who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery in Ordos Center Hospital from June 2020 to December 2022 were selected, and divided into the control group and the observation group using the random number table method, with 50 cases in each group. Both groups underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Children in the control group were anesthetized with propofol combined with remifentanil, and children in the observation group were anesthetized with sevoflurane inhalation combined with remifentanil. The two groups were compared on hemodynamic indicators [heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP)] before entering the room (T0), at the time of skin incision (T1), 5 min after the beginning of surgery (T2), 10 min after the beginning of surgery (T3), and the end of surgery (T4), stress indicators [cortisol, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and C-reactive protein (CRP)] before and after surgery, pain degrees [Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores] and Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery, and agitation.

Results

Heart rate of the control group at T1, T2 and T3 was significantly lower compared to T0 (P<0.05). Compared to T0, there was no statistically significant difference in heart rate of the observation group at T1, T2, T3 and T4 (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in heart rate between the two groups in terms of inter-group effect, time effect, and interaction effect (F=446.800, 62.220, 63.960, P<0.001, <0.001, <0.001). MAP of the control group was significantly lower at T1, T2, T3 and T4 than at T0 (P<0.05). Compared to T0, there was no statistically significant difference in MAP of the observation group at T1, T2, T3 and T4 (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in MAP between the two groups in terms of inter-group effect, time effect, and interaction effect (F=62.540, 9.275, 9.614, P<0.001, <0.001, <0.001). Cortisol, ACTH and CRP increased after surgery in both groups (P<0.05), and were higher in the control group (P<0.05). The control group had higher NRS scores than the observation group at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery (F=434.100, 1.435, 2.263, P<0.001, =0.232, 0.081 for inter-group effect, time effect, and interaction effect). There was no statistically significant difference in RSS scores between the two groups at different time after surgery (F=0.221, 2.201, 0.669, P=0.639, 0.088, 0.572 for inter-group effect, time effect, and interaction effect). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of agitation between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The application of sevoflurane inhalation combined with remifentanil anesthesia in pediatric inguinal hernia repair is beneficial to maintain hemodynamic stability of children, and reduce the incidence rates of stress response.

表1 2组患儿一般资料比较
表2 2组患儿血流动力学比较(±s
表3 2组患儿应激指标比较(±s
表4 2组患儿术后疼痛、镇静程度比较(分,±s
表5 2组患儿苏醒期躁动情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
刘颖. 恒速输注右美托咪定和靶控输注瑞芬太尼用于小儿腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术的比较研究[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2018, 24(16): 1535-1538.
[2]
黄文佳, 赵静文, 沈启云, 等. 倾向性评分匹配评估瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚静脉麻醉在腹股沟斜疝患儿腹腔镜手术中的效果研究[J]. 河北医药, 2022, 44(13): 2017-2020.
[3]
鲁美静, 张恺辰, 程慧娴, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在小儿疝气手术中的临床应用[J]. 皖南医学院学报, 2019, 38(2): 162-164, 169.
[4]
曾昭河, 邹翠芸. 丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉在小儿腹腔镜手术中的临床观察[J]. 儿科药学杂志, 2020, 26(1): 20-23.
[5]
汤荣兴, 李智铭, 余岚, 等. 瑞芬太尼无肌松快通道麻醉在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用[J]. 四川医学, 2018, 39(9): 1045-1049.
[6]
中华医学会. 临床诊疗指南·外科学分册[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2006: 119-120.
[7]
何川, 李元海, 孙玉红, 等. 七氟烷复合瑞芬太尼麻醉对疝气腹腔镜手术患儿血流动力学影响[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2021, 49(2): 153-154.
[8]
邓小英, 田欢. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞用于小儿腹腔镜疝气手术的麻醉效果观察[J]. 贵州医药, 2022, 46(4): 593-594.
[9]
赵亚兵, 王楠. 氟醚复合舒芬太尼对小儿腹腔镜疝修补手术应激及苏醒期的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2020, 37(12): 1891-1893.
[10]
黄艺文, 兰雨雁, 江朝秀. 七氟醚与丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼麻醉在神经外科手术中的应用效果比较[J]. 广西医学, 2018, 40(4): 385-388.
[11]
莫涛, 张奉超. 右美托咪定和丙泊酚分别复合瑞芬太尼在小儿麻醉中维持喉罩通气的临床效果比较[J]. 医学临床研究, 2018, 35(2): 391-393.
[12]
谭新梅. 不同剂量瑞芬太尼全麻诱导用于小儿气管插管的效果比较[J]. 西南国防医药, 2019, 29(3): 358-360.
[13]
张达雷, 侯桂婷, 王欣, 等. 七氟醚或丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼对腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术患者的影响分析[J]. 河北医学, 2021, 27(7): 1108-1114.
[14]
杨玉春, 胡玉萍. 七氟醚与丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼麻醉在神经外科手术中的应用效果比较[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2019, 28(26): 2940-2943.
[15]
隋金玲, 张爱萍, 许旭东. 右美托咪定复合瑞芬太尼在内镜逆行胰胆管造影术老年患者中的麻醉效果[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(6): 357-360.
[16]
陈利新. 七氟烷复合瑞芬太尼用于腹腔镜下小儿腹股沟斜疝疝囊高位结扎术的效果[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2021, 41(11): 2644-2649.
[17]
杨玉春, 胡玉萍. 七氟醚与丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼麻醉在神经外科手术中的应用效果比较[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2019, 28(26): 2940-2943.
[18]
Xu W, Wang L, Yuan XS, et al. Sevoflurane depresses neurons in the medial parabrachial nucleus by potentiating postsynaptic GABAA receptors and background potassium channels[J]. Neuropharmacology, 2020, 181: 108249.
[19]
Ebel LE, Richardson JE, Singh SP, et al. Additive effects of sevoflurane and propofol on gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor function[J]. Anesthesiology, 2006, 104(6): 1176-1183.
[20]
Harris RS, Lazar O, Johansen JW, et al. Interaction of propofol and sevoflurane on loss of consciousness and movement to skin incision during general anesthesia[J]. Anesthesiology, 2006, 104(6): 1170-1175.
[21]
买买提艾力·阿不都哈得尔. 全麻患儿联用瑞芬太尼与七氟烷复合麻醉对苏醒期躁动的影响[J]. 黑龙江医药, 2022, 35(2): 391-393.
[1] 刘芳, 黄纯渊, 王凤林, 马轶美, 汤焘, 侯文佳, 刘蕾. 儿童烧伤创面操作性疼痛非药物管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 159-164.
[2] 郑伟军, 方一凡, 吴典明, 王翔, 陈飞, 刘明坤. 先天性肠旋转不良诊治分析:单中心10年经验总结[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 338-341.
[3] 刘晓菊, 姚芮, 杜镇鸿, 李文忠. 经胸壁入路与低位小切口在甲状腺良性肿瘤切除术中的疗效比较研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 204-207.
[4] 张伟, 蒋童新, 尚培中, 王德淼, 吉玉洁. 3D腹腔镜TEP治疗单纯性腹股沟脂肪斜疝一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 233-234.
[5] 程茂波, 刘钰莎, 张旭, 刘文博, 赵鹏. 对再生型疝修补补片动物试验设计的考量[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 121-124.
[6] 李绍杰, 谢奇峰, 李绍春, 杨子昂, 黄永刚, 陈吉彩, 杜舟, 王平, 张剑, 唐健雄. 复合基底膜生物补片应用于腹股沟疝Lichtenstein修补术的随机、对照、多中心临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 132-138.
[7] 王虞鹭, 代京, 程文悦, 徐隽雅, 张剑. 体外和比格犬体内评价腹内压致生物补片分层及疝复发风险的研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 146-153.
[8] 袁雪涛, 王星傑, 黑赫, 田泓漪, 刘俊矣, 魏光兵, 李徐奇, 蒋正东. 不同材料疝补片对大鼠腹壁缺损修补术后行为学影响的实验研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 154-160.
[9] 赛甫丁·艾比布拉, 买买提·依斯热依力, 李义亮, 王永康, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 不同材质补片修补对腹壁疝大鼠腹横筋膜组织转化生长因子-β1及Collagen合成代谢的作用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 161-167.
[10] 仲洁, 逯景辉, 林振华, 程文悦, 代京, 张剑, 刘成虎. 模拟临床的猪腹壁切口疝模型建立研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 168-172.
[11] 曹桢, 刘子文. 医用胶在腹股沟疝中的临床研究进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 173-177.
[12] 陈传勤, 张凯, 单世涵, 陶亮, 傅巧美. 腹壁巨大切口疝修补术后早期疼痛的危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 178-183.
[13] 陈志升, 司仙科, 吴卫东, 李森, 杨佳华, 李炜, 郑侃, 于昆, 罗晓睿, 葛卫红. 耻脐入路单孔腹腔镜后鞘后技术在脐疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 184-188.
[14] 宋延冰. 腹腔镜手术方式在嵌顿性腹壁疝中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 189-191.
[15] 杨星, 刘梅, 刘思远, 张科. 胃肠癌患者术前焦虑情绪和术后苏醒期躁动情况及影响因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 159-163.
阅读次数
全文


摘要