切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 218 -222. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.02.018

论著

羟考酮复合舒芬太尼在腹腔镜疝修补术中的应用
彭敏敏1,(), 杨晓斌1, 芮亚楠2   
  1. 1. 243100 安徽,德驭医疗马鞍山总医院麻醉科
    2. 243100 安徽马鞍山,当涂县人民医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-24 出版日期:2024-04-18
  • 通信作者: 彭敏敏
  • 基金资助:
    马鞍山市科技计划项目(YL-2022-15)

Application of oxycodone combined with sufentanil in laparoscopic hernia repair surgery

Minmin Peng1,(), Xiaobin Yang1, Ya'nan Rui2   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Deyu Medical Ma'anshan General Hospital, Ma'anshan 243100, Anhui Province, China
    2. Emergency Department, People's Hospital of Dangtu County, Ma'anshan 243100, Anhui Province, China
  • Received:2023-03-24 Published:2024-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Minmin Peng
引用本文:

彭敏敏, 杨晓斌, 芮亚楠. 羟考酮复合舒芬太尼在腹腔镜疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 218-222.

Minmin Peng, Xiaobin Yang, Ya'nan Rui. Application of oxycodone combined with sufentanil in laparoscopic hernia repair surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 218-222.

目的

探讨羟考酮复合舒芬太尼在腹腔镜疝修补术患者中应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析2021年7月至2022年7月德驭医疗马鞍山总医院收治的80例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,按照麻醉方式不同分为2组,各40例。对照组采用羟考酮联合丙泊酚+顺式阿曲库铵进行麻醉,试验组在对照组的基础上联合使用舒芬太尼进行麻醉。分析2组患者的术中情况、麻醉效果视觉模拟评分、血流动力学、疼痛介质、不良反应指标。

结果

2组患者的手术、麻醉时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组苏醒时间少于对照组,差异有统计学意义[(9.72±4.49)min比(26.33±6.11)min,P<0.05]。2组患者的呼叫睁眼消失时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组麻醉起效时间短于试验组,吞咽反射消失时间长于试验组,视觉模拟评分高于对照组患者低,差异有统计学意义[(8.98±1.86)min比(9.74±2.66)min,(4.98±0.59)min比(2.79±0.89)min,(3.33±1.56)分比(2.42±1.49)分;P<0.05]。术后8、12、24 h,试验组患者的平均动脉压、心率和呼吸频率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者SpO2水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前,2组患者的前列腺素E2、5-羟色胺和P物质的表达水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后,2组患者的前列腺素E2、5-羟色胺和P物质表达水平均升高,但试验组的表达水平明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组嗜睡、低血压、呼吸抑制、呛咳等不良反应总发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

羟考酮联合舒芬太尼麻醉应用于腹腔镜疝修补术患者,可有效改善患者疼痛评分,且对机体血流动力学及疼痛介质影响较小。

Objective

To explore the effects of oxycodone combined with sufentanil in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair.

Methods

The clinical data of 80 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to Deyu Medical Ma'anshan General Hospital from July 2021 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, and patients were divided into 2 groups according to different anesthesia methods, with 40 patients in each group. The control group was anesthetized with oxycodone combined with propofol+ cis-atracurium, and the experimental group was anesthetized with sufentanil on the basis of the control group. Intraoperative conditions, visual analogue scores (VAS) of anesthesia effects, hemodynamics, pain mediators, adverse reactions were analyzed between the 2 groups.

Results

The operation and anesthesia time of patients in the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The awakening time of the experimental group was less than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant [(9.72±4.49) min vs (26.33±6.11) min, P<0.05]. There was no statistically significant difference in the disappearing time of the call to open the eyes of the patients between the 2 groups (P>0.05); The onset time of anesthesia in the control group was shorter than that in the experimental group, the disappearance time of swallowing reflex was longer than that in the experimental group, and the VAS score was higher than that of the control group patients, and the difference was statistically significant [(8.98±1.86) min vs (9.74±2.66) min, (4.98±0.59) min vs (2.79±0.89) min, (3.33±1.56) points vs (2.42±1.49) points; P<0.05]. At 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery, the mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate of patients in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); There was no significant difference in the SpO2 levels of patients between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Before operation, the expression levels of prostaglandin E2, 5-hydroxytryptamine and substance P in the 2 groups of patients were not statistically significant (P>0.05); After operation, the expression levels of prostaglandin E2, 5-hydroxytryptamine and substance P between the 2 groups of patients were elevated, but the expression levels in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions such as drowsiness, hypotension, respiratory depression, and choking in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Oxycodone combined with sufentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair effectively improves patients' pain scores with less impact on body hemodynamics and pain mediators.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者术中情况比较(±s
表3 2组患者麻醉效果及术后疼痛评分比较(±s
表4 2组患者各时点血流动力学指标比较(±s
表5 2组患者手术前后24 h疼痛介质指标比较(±s
表6 2组患者术后不良反应比较[例(%)]
[1]
马先, 贺杰, 马俊帅. 丹红注射液结合抗菌药物对腹股沟疝术后血清MMP-2、MMP-9、TIMP-2、TIMP-1及应激指标作用机制研究[J]. 世界中医药, 2019, 14(9): 2404-2407.
[2]
Mourad M, Kharbutli B. Para-inguinal hernia; presentation, diagnosis and surgical treatment, a case report[J]. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2023, 108: 108445.
[3]
Xu LS, Li Q, Wang Y, et al. Current status and progress of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a review[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2023, 102(31): e34554.
[4]
王春景. 腹股沟疝采用腹膜外腹腔镜疝气修补术与传统手术治疗的效果研究[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2020, 26(14): 71-72.
[5]
张立, 孙启泉, 薛云丽. 羟考酮纳洛酮缓释片治疗中重度疼痛的研究进展[J]. 中国医药科学, 2023, 13(22): 30-34.
[6]
邢文灵, 乔硕, 李俊青. 不同剂量舒芬太尼硬膜外麻醉对剖宫产者应激状态、血压影响[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2024, 32(2): 322-325.
[7]
任晓亮. 舒芬太尼与右美托咪定在术后镇痛中的应用效果研究[J]. 中国实用医药, 2024, 19(3): 112-114.
[8]
陈娇娇, 柳西好. 舒芬太尼和芬太尼对老年腹腔镜胆囊血流动力学的影响[J]. 中外医疗, 2023, 42(21): 138-141.
[9]
Raff M, Belbachir A, El-Tallawy S, et al. Intravenous oxycodone versus other intravenous strong opioids for acute postoperative pain control: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Pain Ther, 2019, 8(1): 19-39.
[10]
田玉科, Hart E. 舒芬太尼与芬太尼复合异丙酚静脉麻醉的比较[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 1998, 18(10): 608.
[11]
赵超, 张潇, 田皇华, 等. 羟考酮复合舒芬太尼诱导在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的麻醉效果观察[J]. 名医, 2020(15): 70-72.
[12]
曹东航, 丁进峰, 孙焕焕. 羟考酮联合七氟烷用于腹腔镜胃肠癌手术麻醉患者的临床研究[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2023, 39(6): 791-794.
[13]
韩先龙, 蒲敏, 苏昕, 等. 盐酸氯普鲁卡因联合布比卡因治疗择期混合痔切除术后尿潴留患者的临床研究[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2023(24): 3598-3602.
[14]
董力, 周枫. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑联合瑞芬太尼麻醉对老年脊柱外科手术患者血流动力学和血清炎症因子水平的影响[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2023, 28(12): 1372-1377.
[15]
韦珊珊, 韦宁, 黄钰芳, 等. 右美托咪定联合局部浸润麻醉用于老年骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者的临床研究[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2023, 39(22): 3248-3252.
[16]
肖鹏, 曹磊, 姚立群. 纳布啡复合丙泊酚对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补麻醉效果、应激反应及炎症因子研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(2): 150-153.
[17]
庄起豪, 徐冲敏, 洪霞凤, 等. 氢吗啡酮静脉自控镇痛用于老年患者术后镇痛的效果及对血清疼痛介质的影响[J]. 临床医学工程, 2022, 29(12): 1651-1652.
[18]
翁山耕, 陈易平, 刘国忠, 等. 腹股沟疝急诊手术治疗原则[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(6): 671-675.
[19]
刘新颖, 许向阳, 曾令高, 等. 盐酸羟考酮缓释片体外释药特性研究[J]. 中国药业, 2023, 32(16): 52-56.
[20]
徐洪宇, 何亚爽. 羟考酮与氢吗啡酮用于胃癌根治术后镇痛的疗效[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(5): 312-316.
[21]
王尨珂, 曹晓芳, 李正国. 鞘内注射舒芬太尼与芬太尼对高龄股骨粗隆骨折PFNA内固定术患者的镇痛效果及安全性对比[J]. 中外医学研究, 2024, 22(3): 57-60.
[22]
曾望, 黄海兰, 韦稚. 罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼地佐辛硬膜外麻醉对分娩镇痛产妇麻醉效果及疼痛程度的影响[J]. 中外医疗, 2023, 42(16): 101-105.
[23]
Lei M, Wang Y, Chen Q, et al. Changes in serum levels of pain mediators in hemiplegic shoulder pain[J]. Brain Behav, 2023, 13(12): e3289.
[1] 孙丕绛, 李剑波, 杨永君, 冉超, 王槐志. 腹腔镜下肠系膜上动脉优先入路扩大清扫的胰十二指肠切除术(en-bolc)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 249-249.
[2] 李凯, 张志远, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 一种可拆卸组装的腹腔镜手术器械在单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 250-250.
[3] 宫向良, 刘征, 丁梅. 基于膜解剖D2+CME根治术治疗胃癌的近中期随访研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 267-270.
[4] 金田力, 袁文正, 付涛. 单孔腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术后尿管拔除时机探讨[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 271-274.
[5] 杜彦斌, 黄涛, 寇天阔, 石英. 双镜联合根治术与腹腔镜根治术在早期结肠癌患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-278.
[6] 张聃, 王毅, 冯文迪, 方兴中. 完整结肠系膜切除术与传统根治术治疗结肠癌对患者生存期的影响观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 279-282.
[7] 唐浩, 梁平, 程千里, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 基于数字化微创技术对复杂性肝胆管结石患者胆道、肝静脉、门静脉解剖与变异情况及应用效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 291-294.
[8] 王东阳, 林琳, 娄熙彬. SII对局部进展期胃癌nCRT+腹腔镜胃癌根治术后并发症及预后的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 315-318.
[9] 吴鹏, 许维, 王壮, 郑世海, 宋劲松. 隧道法行腹腔镜下脾切除术的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 319-322.
[10] 聂彬, 赵铁军, 于云宝, 李欢, 谢林峻. 单孔加一孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗乙状结肠癌的疗效与分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 330-333.
[11] 赵国栋, 陆锦俊, 许永强. 不同肠系膜下动脉分型的腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术临床效果及经验总结[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 334-337.
[12] 郑伟军, 方一凡, 吴典明, 王翔, 陈飞, 刘明坤. 先天性肠旋转不良诊治分析:单中心10年经验总结[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 338-341.
[13] 韩智君, 李春, 艾力江·吾斯满, 帕合尔丁·买买提, 韩勇桥, 塔依尔·塔里甫, 西尔扎提·吐尔地. 三镜与双镜联合清创术在感染坏死性胰腺炎中应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 342-345.
[14] 杨尹默, 陈依然, 田孝东. 努力提高腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的规范化水平[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 237-242.
[15] 张太平, 刘悦泽. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术要点与原则[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 243-245.
阅读次数
全文


摘要