切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 58 -61. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.01.013

临床论著

腹腔镜与开放杂交应用Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole术原位修补造口旁疝的疗效
戎世捧1, 姚胜1,()   
  1. 1. 100048 北京,解放军总医院第四医学中心普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-27 出版日期:2022-02-18
  • 通信作者: 姚胜

Effect of laparoscopic and open hybrid application of Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole in situ repair of parastomal hernia

Shipeng Rong1, Sheng Yao1,()   

  1. 1. Deparment of General Suegery, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2019-12-27 Published:2022-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Sheng Yao
引用本文:

戎世捧, 姚胜. 腹腔镜与开放杂交应用Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole术原位修补造口旁疝的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 58-61.

Shipeng Rong, Sheng Yao. Effect of laparoscopic and open hybrid application of Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole in situ repair of parastomal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(01): 58-61.

目的

探讨腹腔镜与开放杂交应用Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole术原位修补造口旁疝的方法及疗效。

方法

2017年5月至2019年5月,解放军总医院第四医学中心采用腹腔镜与开放杂交应用Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole术原位修补造口旁疝11例。患者均为永久性造瘘,其中8例为低位直肠癌行Miles术式后的乙状结肠末端造瘘,3例为膀胱癌行回肠代膀胱术后的回肠末端造瘘。2例患者既往曾行造口旁疝修补术后复发。末次术后3.5~4.0年,平均3.75年。疝环最长径为4~8 cm,平均5.55 cm。

结果

11例均以腹腔镜与开放杂交应用Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole术成功完成腹壁重建手术。手术时间110~190 min,平均141.55 min;术后住院时间6~18 d,平均10 d。术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无肠瘘及腹壁感染发生。2例(18.2%)发生血清肿。随访时间6~23个月,平均随访14.55个月。11例患者术后未见造口旁疝复发或发生其他切口疝。

结论

腹腔镜与开放杂交应用Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole术原位修补造口旁疝是腹壁重建的有效方法,具有复发率低、并发症少等优点,但远期疗效仍需进一步观察随访。

Objective

To investigate the procedure and the effectiveness of laparoscopic and open hybrid application of Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole in situ repair of parastomal hernia.

Methods

Between May 2017 and May 2019, 11 patients with parastomal hernia in the Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital underwent laparoscopic and open hybrid application of Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole technique in situ repair. All stomas of patients were permanent, including 8 cases with end colostomies following Miles operation for low rectal cancer, and 3 cases with end ileostomies following ileal conduit for bladder cancer. Two patients had recurrence after previous parastomal hernia repair. The average time from last operation was 3.75 years (range, 3.5 to 4.0 years). The average longest diameter of hernia ring was 5.55 cm (range, 4 to 8 cm).

Results

Reconstructions of abdominal wall in all 11 patients were performed successfully through laparoscopic and open hybrid application of Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole technique. The average operative time was 141.55 minutes (range, 110 to 190 minutes) and the average postoperative hospitalization days were 10 days (range, 6 to 18 days). All patients achieved healing of incision by first intention with no intestinal fistula or abdominal wall infection. Seroma occurred in 2 patients (18.2%). All patients were followed up 14.55 months on average (range, 6 to 23 months). No parastomal hernia recurrence or incisional hernia occurred in the 11 patients.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic and open hybrid application of Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole in situ repair of parastomal hernia is an effective procedure for reconstruction of abdominal wall, which has the advantages of low recurrence rate and less complications. But the long-term effectiveness needs further observation and follow-up.

图1 腹腔镜与开放杂交应用Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole术原位修补造口旁疝术中补片示意图
[1]
Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia[J]. Br J Surg, 2003, 90(7): 784-793.
[2]
Israelsson LA. Parastomal hernias[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2008, 88(1): 113-125.
[3]
Tekkis PP, Kocher HM, Payne JG. Parastomal hernia repair: modified thorlakson technique, reinforced by polypropylene mesh[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1999, 42(11): 1505-1508.
[4]
Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ Jr, Matthews JB. Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair?[J]. Arch Surg, 1994, 129(4): 413-419.
[5]
Cheung MT, Chia NH, Chiu WY. Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2001, 44(2): 266-270.
[6]
Morris-Stiff G, Hughes LE. The continuing challenge of parastomal hernia: failure of a novel polypropylene mesh repair[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1998, 80(3): 184-187.
[7]
Aldridge AJ, Simson JN. Erosion and perforation of colon by synthetic mesh in a recurrent paracolostomy hernia[J]. Hernia, 2001, 5(2): 110-112.
[8]
李基业. 造口旁疝的预防和处理[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2012, 32(1): 66-69.
[9]
Ferranti F, Triveri P, Mancini P, et al. The treatment of large midline incisional hernias using a retromuscular prosthetic mesh (Stoppa-Rives technique)[J]. Chir Ital, 2003, 55(1): 129-136.
[10]
刘飞德,李基业,姚胜. Sublay法原位修补34例造口旁疝[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2010, 24(8): 933-936.
[11]
姚琪远,何凯. 造口旁疝手术治疗术式选择及技术要点[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2012, 32(6): 443-445.
[12]
费阳,李基业,姚胜. 改良Sublay-Keyhole技术原位修补造口旁疝[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2011, 25(9): 1067-1070.
[13]
唐健雄,李绍杰. 造口旁疝的防治进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(6): 413-415.
[14]
Berger D, Bientzle M. Polyvinylidene fluoride: a suitable mesh material for laparoscopic incisional and parastomal hernia repair!A prospective, observational study with 344 patients[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(2): 167-172.
[15]
李绍杰,胡星辰,黄磊, 等. 单中心造口旁疝10年诊治经验(附220例报告)[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2016, 21(2): 121-125.
[1] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[2] 段东峰, 王成果, 王青, 王健, 惠立良, 莘玮, 杨媛. 两种造口旁疝修补术的临床效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 435-438.
[3] 曹能琦, 张恒, 郑立锋, 陶庆松, 嵇振岭. Ad-Hoc 自裁剪补片用于造口旁疝Sugarbaker 修补术[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 620-623.
[4] 王招荐, 曹桢, 郭小双, 靳小雷, 刘子文. 加速康复外科理念应用于腹壁重建手术的系统评价及Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 343-350.
[5] 朱俊佳, 孙琦, 徐文龙, 陆天宇, 冯强, 储涛, 邢春根, 高春冬, 俞一峰, 赵振国. 永久性结肠造口预防性补片置入对预防造口旁疝价值的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 336-342.
[6] 孙红燕, 李娟. 造口旁疝患者生活质量的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 273-276.
[7] 高旭, 李若凡, 孙立新, 刘佐军, 田广健. Miles手术中预置腹膜前补片预防造口旁疝的效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 266-272.
[8] 许熠, 邵翔宇, 李俊生. 膀胱切除术后造口旁疝的治疗[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 262-265.
[9] 刘化胜, 郑龙波, 秦琛, 王伟芹, 郑学风, 马金龙, 马正, 王洪霞, 刘磊, 胡继霖. 基于影像学指标构建永久性乙状结肠造口旁疝发病风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 75-82.
[10] 毛永欢, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 王行舟, 沈晓菲, 喻春钊. 造口旁疝危险因素预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 682-687.
[11] 方红燕, 刘晓昌, 方家旭. 腹部按压联合综合护理在腹壁造口旁疝患者肠镜检查中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-629.
[12] 柯文杰, 王勇. 成人腹壁硬纤维瘤切除术后腹壁组织修复重建的单中心临床研究经验[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 535-538.
[13] 刘雪峰, 韩海峰, 杨硕, 逯景辉. 腹腔镜腹壁侵袭性纤维瘤病切除联合腹壁重建:单中心经验总结[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 374-379.
[14] 《造口旁疝专家微共识:腹膜外Sugarbaker修补技术》编审委员会, 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》编辑委员会, 全国卫生产业企业管理协会疝和腹壁外科产业及临床研究分会造口旁疝专家组. 造口旁疝专家微共识:腹膜外Sugarbaker修补技术[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 243-246.
[15] 龚泽众, 朱万骥, 任延英, 徐朝辉, 曲慧, Hyok Ju Ri, 张帆, 邵帅, 陈鑫. 预防性放置补片对预防造口旁疝疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 96-104.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?