切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 53 -57. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.01.012

临床论著

基于Kirkpatrick's四级培训评估模型腔镜腹股沟疝培训课程的效果分析
汤福鑫1, 马宁1, 江志鹏1, 李英儒1, 甘文昌1, 侯泽辉1, 周太成1,(), 陈双1   
  1. 1. 510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院胃肠、腹壁及疝外科,广东省胃肠病学研究所 广东省结直肠盆底疾病研究重点实验室 国家临床重点专科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-10 出版日期:2022-02-18
  • 通信作者: 周太成
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目(2021A1515410004); 广州市科技计划项目(2022010630010045)

An analysis of the effectiveness of the laparoscopic inguinal hernia training course based on Kirkpatrick's four-level training evaluation model

Fuxin Tang1, Ning Ma1, Zhipeng Jiang1, Yingru Li1, Wenchang Gan1, Zehui Hou1, Taicheng Zhou1,(), Shuang Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Hernia Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology、Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases、Supported by National Key Clinical Discipline, Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2019-12-10 Published:2022-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Taicheng Zhou
引用本文:

汤福鑫, 马宁, 江志鹏, 李英儒, 甘文昌, 侯泽辉, 周太成, 陈双. 基于Kirkpatrick's四级培训评估模型腔镜腹股沟疝培训课程的效果分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 53-57.

Fuxin Tang, Ning Ma, Zhipeng Jiang, Yingru Li, Wenchang Gan, Zehui Hou, Taicheng Zhou, Shuang Chen. An analysis of the effectiveness of the laparoscopic inguinal hernia training course based on Kirkpatrick's four-level training evaluation model[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(01): 53-57.

目的

探讨腔镜腹股沟疝技术培训班的临床效果。

方法

对参加中山大学附属第六医院胃肠、疝和腹壁外科2018年8月20至24日举办的腹股沟疝腔镜技术培训班的64名学员进行回顾性横断面研究。开展腔镜疝修补时间0~6年,平均手术时间(2.1±1.6)年。对学员培训前、培训结束时及培训3~6个月后前后进行问卷调查学员对培训课程的反馈,培训前及培训后3~6个月的手术表现,并基于Kirkpatrick's四级培训评估模型对结果进行分析。腹股沟疝腔镜技术培训班包括腔镜基础技能培训、腹股沟疝手术相关理论授课及手术演示。

结果

有64.5%学员对培训课程表示满意。培训后3个月发出调查问卷64份,回收39份,回答率约39/64(60.9%)。回复的学员中,培训前23名有腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)经验,10名有腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)经验,6名是初学者。其中,有TAPP经验的学员中,每一步骤平均自信心得分从培训前的(3.23±0.94)分提高到(3.73±0.68)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);有TEP经验的10名学员中,每一步骤平均自信心得分从(2.99±0.84)分提高到(3.76±0.58)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。以初发单侧腹股沟疝为例,TAPP手术时间从培训前的97.6 min减少到培训后76.3 min,TEP手术时间从培训前102.0 min减少到培训后76.5 min(P<0.05);TAPP手术出血量从培训前13.9 ml减少到培训后7.7 ml,TEP手术出血量从培训前17.0 ml减少到培训后8.4 ml,学员手术表现得到明显提升(P<0.05)。在6名初学者中,有4名已开展TAPP,2名仍未开展TAPP或TEP。

结论

开展腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术前参加规范化的腔镜腹股沟疝技术培训课程非常重要,通过参加腹腔镜腹股沟疝技术培训班可以明显提升医师的手术水平。

Objective

This article investigated the clinical effect of the laparoscopic inguinal hernia technical training course.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional studyin was conducted on 64 trainees who participated in the inguinal hernia endoscopy technical training, which was held by the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from August 20 to 24, 2018. The duration of laparoscopic hernia repair was 0~6 (average operative time 2.1±1.6) years. We distributed questionnaires to trainees before, at the end of and 3~6 months after the training. The main contents of the questionnaire include their feedbacks on the training course, and also their surgery performance before and 3 to 6 months after the training. We analyzed the survey results based on Kirkpatrick's four-level training evaluation model. The inguinal hernia endoscopy technical training includes basic skills training on endoscopy, lectures on inguinal hernia surgery theories, and surgery demonstrations.

Results

64.5% of the trainees were satisfied with the training course. 3 months after the training, we distributed 64 questionnaires and 39 were recovered. The response rate was 39/64 (60.9%). According to these respondents, twenty-three trainees have already had TAPP experience; ten trainees have had TEP experience; six trainees were beginners. Trainees with TAPP experience improved the average confidence score in each step of TAPP from (3.23±0.94) points before training to (3.73±0.68) points after training (P<0.05). Trainees with TEP experience increased the average confidence score in each step of TEP from (2.99±0.84) to (3.76±0.58) points (P<0.05). Take the primary unilateral inguinal hernia as an example, the operative time of TAPP decreased from 97.6 minutes before training to 76.3 minutes after training, and the operative time of TEP decreased from 102.0 to 76.5 minutes (P<0.05). The operative blood loss of TAPP decreased from 13.9 ml before training to 7.7 ml after training. The operative blood loss of TEP decreased from 17.0 ml to 8.4 ml (P<0.05). This indicated that the surgical performance of trainees improved significantly. Four of the six beginners have started TAPP, but two beginners haven't started TAPP or TEP yet.

Conclusion

It is extremely important to take the standardized training course for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair before performing the surgery. The surgery performance can be significantly improve by taking the laparoscopic inguinal hernia technical training course.

表1 64名学员一般资料
表2 64名学员课程具体评价情况[例(%)]
表3 33名学员TAPP和TEP手术培训前、后自信心评分(分)
[1]
Singh AN, Bansal VK, Misra MC, et al. Testicular functions, chronic groin pain, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(5): 1304-1317.
[2]
Kirkpatrick D. Evaluation, training programs: the four levels, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler publishers. Learning transfer[J]. Int J Train Dev, 1994, 6(1): 36-48.
[3]
Kingsnorth AN. General Introduction and History of Hernia Surgery[M]//Kingsnorth AN, LeBlanc KA. Management of Abdominal Hernias. London: Springer, 2013: 1-22.
[4]
唐健雄. 我国腹股沟疝治疗现状和急需解决的几个问题[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1197-1201.
[5]
唐健雄,李绍杰,黄磊. 我国腹股沟疝手术规范化和质量控制存在的问题及对策[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(1): 72-74.
[6]
大中华腔镜疝外科学院,中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组. 腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化操作指南[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(5): 505-512.
[7]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,大中华腔镜疝外科学院. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术操作指南(2017版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 401-406.
[8]
陈双,李英儒. 谈腹股沟疝腔镜的腹膜外修补操作技术[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(10): 1227-1229.
[9]
周太成,于洪燕,马宁, 等. T型疝囊切开游离巨大斜疝疝囊在腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2018, 27(4): 488-493.
[10]
周太成,于洪燕,江志鹏, 等. 自制直针三尾免打结缝线在TAPP腹膜缝合的应用研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(8): 907-910.
[11]
周太成,马宁,于洪燕, 等. 单手四针缝合法关闭腹股沟直疝假疝囊的临床应用研究[J]. 中国胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(7): 749-754.
[12]
侯泽辉,江志鹏,李英儒, 等. 局部冰敷对腹股沟疝修补术后早期疼痛的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(2): 108-111.
[13]
Banerjee SC, Manna R, Coyle N, et al. The implementation and evaluation of a communication skills training program for oncology nurses[J]. Transl Behav Med, 2017, 7(3): 615-623.
[14]
Dort J, Trickey A, Paige J, et al. All in: expansion of the acquisition of data for outcomes and procedure transfer(ADOPT) program to an entire SAGES annual meeting hands-on hernia course[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(11): 4491-4497.
[15]
Bylund CL, Brown RF, Bialer PA, et al. Developing and implementing an advanced communication training program in oncology at a comprehensive cancer center[J]. J Cancer Educ, 2011, 26(4): 604-611.
[16]
Dorri S, Akbari M, Dorri Sedeh M. Kirkpatrick evaluation model for in-service training on cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res, 2016, 21(5): 493-497.
[17]
Tanaka R, DeAsis F, Vigneswaran Y, et al. Video review program enhances resident training in laparoscopic inguinal hernia: a randomized blinded controlled trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(6): 2847-2851.
[18]
Zendejas B, Cook DA, Bingener J, et al. Simulation-based mastery learning improves patient outcomes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 254(3): 502-509.
[19]
Matsumoto S, Hayakawa T, Kawarada Y, et al. Proper training in laparoscopic hernia repair is necessary to minimize the rising recurrence rate in Japan[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2018, 11(2): 151-154.
[20]
Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN. From ancient to contemporary times: a concise history of incisional hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(1): 1-7.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?