切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 276 -280. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.03.016

临床论著

超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中的应用及其安全性评价
韩蓓1,(), 许日昇1, 汪洪1   
  1. 1. 241000 安徽省芜湖市第五人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-03 出版日期:2021-06-18
  • 通信作者: 韩蓓

Application and safety evaluation of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block in inguinal hernia surgery in the elderly

Bei Han1,(), Risheng Xu1, Hong Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, the Fifth People's Hospital of Wuhu, Wuhu 241000, China
  • Received:2020-01-03 Published:2021-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Bei Han
引用本文:

韩蓓, 许日昇, 汪洪. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中的应用及其安全性评价[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 276-280.

Bei Han, Risheng Xu, Hong Wang. Application and safety evaluation of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block in inguinal hernia surgery in the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 276-280.

目的

探究超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中的应用及其安全性。

方法

选择2018年7月至2019年11月,安徽省芜湖市第五人民医院行老年腹股沟疝手术64例患者的病例资料。美国麻醉医师协会分级Ⅰ~Ⅲ级,年龄60~85岁,体质量指数18~25 kg/m2,采用随机数字表法随机分为对照组和观察组,每组32例。对照组给予腰椎麻醉;观察组患者超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞麻醉。比较2组进入手术室时(T0)、麻醉完成后5 min(T1)、切皮后(T2)、手术结束时(T3)、术后6 h(T4)不同时刻的血流动力学指标,包括脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)、平均动脉压(MAP)及心率(HR)。对比2组患者术后时刻、术后6 h、术后12 h的视觉模拟评分法(VAS);对比2组患者住院时间、麻醉满意度评分及术后恢复活动的时间;对比T0、T3、T4胃泌素(GAS)和胃动素(MTL);记录2组患者术后24 h的并发症及不良反应。

结果

2组SpO2在T0~T4不同时刻比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组HR在T1~T3时刻显著低于T0时刻,而且对照组的MAP在T1、T2、T3时刻较观察组低,两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者在术后6 h VAS评分低于对照组,2组比较差异有统计学意义(t=3.690,P<0.05)。观察组手术时间、术后恢复活动时间较对照组短,麻醉满意度评分高于对照组,2组比较差异均有统计学意义(t=3.473,2.845,3.097;P<0.05)2组患者在T4时GAS、MTL的表达水平差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),T3时刻均较T0时刻低,说明手术影响胃肠激素水平表达,观察组T4时刻较对照组高(P<0.05),说明观察组术后胃肠道恢复优于对照组。观察组患者恶心呕吐的发生率低于对照组,较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其他不良反应对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在超声引导下对老年腹股沟疝患者使用髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞术,能减少老年患者的生理影响,加快患者的术后肠胃功能,降低恶心呕吐发生率,值得推广。

Objective

To evaluate the application and safety of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block in the operation of inguinal hernia in the elderly.

Methods

64 elderly patients who underwent inguinal hernia surgery in the Fifth People's Hospital of Wuhu from July 2018 to November 2019 were selected as study subjects. With ASA gradeⅠ-Ⅲ, age 60 to 85 years old, BMI 18 to 25 kg/m2, the patients were divided into control group (n=32, lumbar anesthesia) and observation group (n=32, ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block) by random number table method. Compare the two groups at entering the operating room (T0), 5 mintes after the completion of anesthesia (T1), cutting skin (T2), at the end of surgery (T3), 6 hours after surgery (T4) with hemodynamic indexes of different time [pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR)], compared two groups of patients with postoperative pain degree (VAS score) at immediate postoperative time, postoperative 6 hours, and 12 hours; compared two groups of patients anesthesia satisfaction score, postoperative recovery time, and length of stay; Gastrointestinal hormone levels at T0, T3 and T4 [gastrin (GAS) and motilin (MTL)] were compared; and complications and adverse reactions at 24 h after operation were recorded in the two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in SpO2 between the two groups at T0-T4 (P>0.05). Compared with T0, HR at T1-T3 in the control group was significantly lower, and MAP at T1, T2 and T3 in the control group were lower than those in the observation group (P<0.05). VAS score at 6h after operation in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The operative time and postoperative activity recovery time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group, and the anesthesia satisfaction score was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The expression levels of GAS and MTL were significantly different between the two groups at different time points (P<0.05). The expression levels of GAS and MTL were both lower at T3 than at T0, while the expression levels of GAS and MTL were higher in the observation group than the control group at T4 (P<0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in other adverse reactions.

Conclusion

The application of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal iliac hypogastric nerve block in the operation of inguinal hernia in the elderly can reduce the physiological influence of the elderly patients, accelerate gastrointestinal function after the operation, and reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting, and it is worthy of promotion.

表1 比较2组患者不同时刻血流动力学指标(±s
表2 2组患者不同时间点视觉模拟评分比较(分,±s
表3 对比2组患者手术时间、麻醉满意度评分、术后恢复活动时间(±s
表4 对比2组患者胃肠激素水平(ng/L,±s
表5 2组患者术后不良反应发生率对比[例(%)]
[1]
占学书. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术的应用[J]. 江西医药, 2012, 47(5): 461-463.
[2]
孙熠,王海云,华伟, 等. 罗哌卡因用于超声引导老年腹股沟疝患者髂腹下、髂腹股沟联合生殖股神经阻滞的EC50及EC95[J]. 天津医药, 2020, 48(7): 654-656.
[3]
杨宁,左明章,孟小燕, 等. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合局部浸润麻醉在老年患者腹股沟疝中的应用[J]. 中国临床医师杂志, 2017, 45(3): 48-51.
[4]
杨慧琪,刘敏,申英末. 2018年国际腹股沟疝指南解读:成人腹股沟疝管理(一)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(5): 321-325.
[5]
濮健峰,王梅芳,潘四磊, 等. 超声引导下以旋髂深动脉为标记的髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年斜疝手术中的应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2017, 33(10): 974-976.
[6]
覃兆军,占乐云,向春艳, 等. 右美托咪定混合罗哌卡因超声引导下髂腹股沟神经及髂腹下神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝修补术的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 460-464.
[7]
纪健,李亚春,鲁应军, 等. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中应用效果及安全性分析[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2019, 37(10): 8-9.
[8]
易治国,赵欣蕊,李娟, 等. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年斜疝手术最少药物剂量的探讨[J]. 医学临床研究, 2018, 35(11): 2190-2192.
[9]
褚丽花,王亚,吴水晶, 等. 超声引导下星状神经节阻滞对胃肠手术患者围术期炎症反应及术后胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2018, 38(8): 904-907.
[1] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[2] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[3] 李婷婷, 吴荷玉, 张悦, 程康, 张晓芳, 程娅婵. 复合保温策略在老年腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 522-525.
[4] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[5] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[6] 赵宏霞, 刘静, 李晓薇, 陈金婵, 汪志霞. 腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年子宫脱垂效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 561-565.
[7] 孙伟, 林丽, 师高洋. 超声引导下连续髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中应用效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 593-597.
[8] 张汪, 徐淑英, 张爱华, 夏芬荣, 汪露. 手术室体温护理结合细节护理干预在老年腹股沟疝围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 635-638.
[9] 杨鹏, 刘冲. PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间骨折后隐匿性失血及其危险因素的横断面研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 301-306.
[10] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[11] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[12] 毛树文, 袁方, 唐昊, 王建民. 针刀调节交感神经对老年胃溃疡患者胃功能和溃疡愈合的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 326-330.
[13] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[14] 晏美娟, 邵礼晖. 高水平脂蛋白(a)与无“三高”老年人群小动脉硬化型脑小血管病的相关性研究[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 458-463.
[15] 邓颖, 黄山, 胡慧秀, 孙超. 老年缺血性脑卒中患者危险因素聚集情况分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 344-349.
阅读次数
全文


摘要