Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (05): 547-551. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2025.05.012

Special Issue:

• Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Observation on the efficacy of total pelvic floor reconstruction via laparoscopy for pelvic organ prolapse

Mi Gong, Yuanyuan Zhu(), Yijun Yang   

  1. Gynecology Department, The Affiliated Huai'an No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai'an 223300, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2025-08-05 Online:2025-10-18 Published:2025-11-07
  • Contact: Yuanyuan Zhu

Abstract:

Objective

To analyze the efficacy of total pelvic floor reconstruction via laparoscopy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

Ninety POP patients with POP admitted to Huai'an First Hospital between January 2019 and January 2022 were enrolled and divided into a control group (44 cases) and an observation group (46 cases) according to surgical methods. Patients in the control group underwent vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair. Patients in the observation group underwent total pelvic floor reconstruction with titanium-coated polypropylene (TiLOOP) mesh implantation via laparoscopy. Surgical outcomes, pain levels, pelvic floor muscle strength, quality of life, complications, and prognosis were compared between the two groups.

Results

The observation group showed less intraoperative blood loss (24.38±7.14) ml, shorter indwelling catheter time (2.39±0.62) days, and shorter postoperative hospital stay (5.84±1.52) days compared to the control group (46.22±10.76) ml, (3.06±0.72) days, (7.17±1.98) days. The operation time (131.29±28.47) minutes was longer than that of the control group (98.54±21.36) minutes (P<0.05). The observation group had shorter self-perceived pain duration (3.86±0.45) days and lower visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 12 hours postoperatively (4.29±0.47) points versus the control group (4.17±0.59) days, (4.66±0.79) points (P<0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, the observation group exhibited higher myoelectric potential (14.19±2.13) μV, static tension (156.49±21.83) g/cm2, and dynamic tension (231.56±28.44) g/cm2 than the control group (12.98±1.95) μV, (144.92±22.64) g/cm2, (216.47±27.08) g/cm2 (P<0.05). At 12 months postoperatively, the observation group had lower pelvic organ prolapse distress inventory 6 (POPDI-6) (6.83±1.51) points, colorectal-anal distress inventory 8 (CRADI-8) (2.27±0.62) points, and urinary distress inventory 6 (UDI-6) (6.76±1.13) points than the control group (7.65±1.79) points, (2.61±0.83) points, (7.43±1.89) points (P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in complication rates or POP recurrence rates between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Total pelvic floor reconstruction with TiLOOP mesh via laparoscopy reduces intraoperative bleeding, shortens postoperative recovery time, alleviates pain, enhances pelvic floor muscle strength, improves quality of life, and does not increase complications compared to traditional surgery.

Key words: Pelvic organ prolapse, Titanium-coated polypropylene, Laparoscopic surgery, Pelvic floor muscle strength, Transobturator mid-urethral sling procedur

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-68665919 E-mail: zhshfbwkzz@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd