Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (05): 493-497. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2025.05.002

Special Issue:

• Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical application of a basement membrane biopatch visceral protective sac for preventing enteroatmospheric fistula during negative pressure assisted temporary abdominal closure

Guoliang Chen1, Ning Su1, Guoyi Shao2, Jian Zhang1,()   

  1. 1Department of Colorectal Surgery, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
    2Department of General Surgery I, Jiangyin People's Hospital, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Nantong University, Jiangyin 214400, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2025-08-28 Online:2025-10-18 Published:2025-11-07
  • Contact: Jian Zhang

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical efficacy of a basement membrane biopatch visceral protective sac in preventing enteroatmospheric fistula during negative pressure-assisted temporary abdominal closure (NPAAC).

Methods

A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 5 patients who underwent NPAAC with the application of the basement membrane biopatch for visceral protection at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from June 2024 to April 2025. Patient demographics, complication rates, abdominal wound healing status, and hospital length of stay were analyzed.

Results

In this study, there were 5 patients, including two males and three females, with a median age of 57.0 (IQR: 46.0-60.5) years and a median body mass index of 24.8 (IQR: 22.4-27.1) kg/m2. The median time from initial surgery to wound opening due to infection was 5.0 (IQR: 4.5-6.0) days. Prior to NPAAC, three patients underwent wound debridement and peritoneal lavage during exploratory laparotomy, while two received temporary ileostomy plus peritoneal lavage during exploratory laparotomy. All five patients survived following NPAAC treatment. The median number of negative- pressure therapy sponge changes was 3.0 (IQR: 2.0-6.0) times. Gastrointestinal function recovery occurred at a median of 3.0 (IQR: 2.0-8.3) days, and the negative-pressure device was removed after a median of 9.0 (IQR: 7.5-31.0) days. Definitive tension-reducing suture closure was performed in three patients, one received split-thickness skin grafting, and one underwent staged abdominal wall reconstruction following stamp grafting. The median total hospital stay was 25.0 (IQR: 22.0-47.5) days. No enteroatmospheric fistula occurred during treatment. Complications mainly included wound bleeding, urinary tract infection, gastric retention, and pulmonary infection, all of which resolved with drug treatment. During a median follow-up of 7.0 (IQR: 4.0-10.5) months, all abdominal wounds healed. One patient developed an incisional hernia, which was managed conservatively.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that visceral protection with a basement membrane biopatch before NPAAC is a safe and feasible approach, which can effectively reduce the occurrence of enteroatmospheric fistula.

Key words: Secondary peritonitis, Open abdomen treatment, Visceral protective layer, Negative pressure-assisted temporary abdominal closure, Basement membrane biopatch, Enteroatmospheric fistulae

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-68665919 E-mail: zhshfbwkzz@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd