Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06): 649-652. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.06.009

• Clinical Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical efficacy analysis of tunnel stoma with intact posterior sheath for prevention of parastomal hernia

Cong Tong1, Hui Wang2, Zheqi Zhou1, Zeyu Li1, Likun Yan1,(), Xiaoqiang Wang1   

  1. 1. The First Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincal People's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710068, China
    2. Graduate Office of Xi'an Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710068, China
  • Received:2022-02-11 Online:2022-12-18 Published:2022-12-15
  • Contact: Likun Yan

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the short-term effects of a conventional stoma approach with tunnel stoma approach that preserves the integrity of the posterior sheath and, to investigate the clinical efficacy of tunnel stoma approach in preventing parastomal hernia.

Methods

Seventy patients who underwent permanent sigmoid colostomy for low rectal cancer in the First Department of General Surgery of Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital from March 2014 to April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent laparoscopic transabdominal perineal combined with radical resection of rectal cancer. The patients were divided into 40 cases in the control group (conventional colostomy approach) and 30 cases in the experimental group (tunnel stoma approach with preservation of the posterior sheath intact) according to the stoma methods. General clinical data, duration of surgery, postoperative stoma evacuation time, postoperative feeding time, stoma-related complications, incidence of parastomal hernia were compared and analyzed.

Results

There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender, age, BMI, TNM stage, duration of surgery, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative stoma evacuation time, postoperative feeding time, stoma complications and incision infection rate. (P>0.05). The incidence of parastomal hernia in the control group was significantly higher than that in the experimental group (27.5% vs 0, P<0.05). The majority of the stoma patients the control group had parastomal hernias between 2 weeks and 3 years after surgery.

Conclusion

A tunnel stoma with the posterior sheath intact can prevent parastomal hernia in the short term.

Key words: Permanent colostomy, Tunnel stoma, Parastomal hernia, Rectal cancer, Complication

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-68665919 E-mail: zhshfbwkzz@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd