Abstract:
Objective To compare the effect of open preperitoneal herniorrhaphy and trans-abdominal preperitoneal repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia.
Methods The clinical data of 202 inguinal hernia patients from October 2019 to November 2021 in Beijing Chuiyangliu Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into open group (n=122) and laparoscopic group (n=80). The general characteristic, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, pain degree, length of hospital stay, hospitalization cost and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.
Results There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, pain degree in the first month after surgery, and postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The pain degree on the 1st and 7th day after operation in the laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that in the open group (P<0.001), and the hospitalization cost in the laparoscopic group was significantly higher than that in the open group (P<0.001).
Conclusion Both open preperitoneal herniorrhaphy and trans-abdominal preperitoneal repair can effectively treat inguinal hernia. The latter has less pain and faster recovery.
Key words:
Hernia, inguinal,
Herniorrhaphy,
Laparoscopes
Yongzhe Wu, Huazhi Li, Chunhai Guo, Chen Xu, Fan Tong, Hongli Cui. Clinical comparison of open preperitoneal herniorrhaphy and trans-abdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 557-560.