Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02): 203-205. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.02.018

• Clinical Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative study of integrated and separate spermatic cord dissociation in hernia repair

Yangyang Bai1, Fan Wang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Forest Engineering Hospital, Xi'an 710399, China
    2. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China
  • Received:2021-09-29 Online:2022-04-18 Published:2022-04-22
  • Contact: Fan Wang

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the efficacy of integrated spermatic cord dissociation and separate dissociation in open inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

The clinical data of 80 patients admitted to Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University and Shaanxi Forest Engineering Hospital from May 2020 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to different methods of spermatic cord dissociation. The observation group 42 cases using integrated spermatic cord dissociation, the control group 38 cases using separate dissociation. All patients underwent preperitoneal tension-free hernia repair under local anesthesia. The clinical data of patients were collected. The clinical indicators of the two groups were compared.

Results

All patients in 2 groups successfully completed surgery. The operation time between observation group and the control group had no significant difference (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss of the observation group was less than the control group (P<0.05). The postoperative incidence of temporary nerve paresthesia and seroma between the observation group and the control group had no significant difference (P>0.05). There was no recurrence in 2 groups of patients after operation.

Conclusion

Integrated and separate spermatic cord dissociation were both safe and effective. Integrated spermatic cord dissociation was based on anatomical basis, with a small injury, without destroying the spermatic integral structure. Although separate spermatic cord dissociation destroyed the whole structure of the testosterone muscle, the rates of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative incidence of abnormal area feel had no significant difference after hemostasis and nerve protection. Both spermatic cord dissociation methods have reference and promotion value.

Key words: Hernia, inguinal, Spermatic cord, Complications

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-68665919 E-mail: zhshfbwkzz@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd