Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02): 130-133. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.02.008

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative study of nerve block and spinal-epidural combined anesthesia on hemodynamic parameters in elderly patients with indirect inguinal hernia

Chaowen Deng1, Meng Chen1, Huajuan Lei1, Qi Zhou1, Yongjie Teng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410007, Hunan
  • Received:2018-12-18 Online:2019-04-18 Published:2019-04-18
  • Contact: Yongjie Teng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Teng Yongjie, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the effects of nerve block and spinal-epidural combined anesthesia on hemodynamic parameters in elderly patients with indirect inguinal hernia.

Methods

86 elderly patients with indirect inguinal hernia treated in general surgery of First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from May 2016 to May 2018 were randomly divided into the spinal-epidural combined group (43 cases) and the nerve block group (43 cases). All patients received elective surgery. The spinal-epidural combined with bupivacaine was given to the patients in the spinal-epidural combined group. The nerve block group was given ropivacaine and dexmedetopyrimidine for nerve block under the guidance of ultrasound. Hemodynamic parameters, anesthetic effect and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in the levels of MAP, RR and SPO2 between the two groups at different time points (P>0.05); the level of HR in the nerve block group at T1 was significantly lower than that in the spinal-epidural combined group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the level of HR between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05). The score of VAS at skin incision in the nerve block group was significantly lower than that in the spinal-epidural group, while the sedation score of Ramsay and sensory block duration in the nerve block group was significantly higher than those in the spinal-epidural group, but the onset time of sensory block in the spinal-epidural combined group was shorter than that in the nerve block group. (P<0.05). After treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions in the nerve block group (6.98%) was significantly lower than that in the spinal-epidural combined group (23.36%) (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Nerve block is better than spinal-epidural combined anesthesia in elderly patients with indirect inguinal hernia. It can significantly produce better analgesic and sedative effects, and the incidence of adverse reactions is small, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Key words: Nerve block, Spinal-epidural combined anesthesia, Elderly patients with indirect inguinal hernia, Hemodynamic parameters, Anesthetic effect, Adverse reactions

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-68665919 E-mail: zhshfbwkzz@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd