Effect of millimeter wave on enhancing analgesia and reducing seroma after inguinal hernia repair of senile patients

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.02.004

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the effect of millimeter wave (MMW) on analgesia and reducing seroma after inguinal hernia repair in senile patients.

Methods

The clinical records of 63 patients (70 hernias) admitted to Beijing Friendship Hospital, from January 2015 to October 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. 70 hernias were divided either into MMW group (n=28) vs control group (n=42) or into non-seroma group (n=33) vs seroma group (n=37). Resting pain intensity was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 and 12 h postoperatively, while resting and activating pain intensity was assessed by VAS on 1, 2, 3 and 7 days after the surgery, respectively. The incidence of seroma was recorded.

Results

In resting condition, there were no statistic difference of VAS scores between MMW group and control group at 6, 12 hours and on 1 days after the surgery (all P>0.05), while VAS scores were significantly lower in MMW group than in control group on 2, 3 and 7 days postoperatively (all P<0.01). In activating condition, there were no statistic difference of VAS scores between MMW group and control group on 1-day postoperatively (P=0.052), while VAS scores were significantly lower in MMW group than in control group on 2-day, 3-day and 7-day postoperatively (all P=0.000). The incidence of seroma was 21.4% in MMW group and 54.8% in control group, respectively. MMW group has significantly lower incidence of seroma than control group (χ²=7.693, P=0.006). The average of VAS score was 2.57±0.56 in non-seroma group, while 3.23±0.68 in seroma group. The average of VAS score was significantly lower in non-seroma group than in seroma group (t=-4.338, P=0.006).

Conclusion

The application of MMW therapy after inguinal hernia repair in senile patients can enhance the effect of analgesia and reduce the incidence of seroma.

Key words: Hernia, inguinal, Pain, Postoperative, Seroma

Peixin Li, Bo Zhang, Shengqi Qin, Yongsheng Guo, Jianshe Li, Jin Wang, Guojun Wang, Zhi Zheng, Xianpu Meng, Xianbei Yang, Zhongtao Zhang. Effect of millimeter wave on enhancing analgesia and reducing seroma after inguinal hernia repair of senile patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(02): 111-116.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhshfbwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.02.004

https://zhshfbwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2019/V13/I02/111

Figures/Tables 7

References 23

[1]	黄志东，李朝阳，杨吉雄, 等. 老年初发非嵌顿性腹股沟疝开放性手术患者的麻醉[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 43-46.
[2]	deGoede B, Timmermans L, van Kempen BJH, et al. Risk factors for inguinal hernia in middle-aged and elderly men: results from the Rotterdam Study[J]. Surgery, 2015, 157(3): 540-546.
[3]	国永生. 腹股沟疝手术局部麻醉方法探讨[J/CD]. 中华普通外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2007, 1(2): 111-112.
[4]	国永生. 腹股沟疝日间手术经验和注意事项[J]. 临床外科杂志. 2010, 18(3): 155-156.
[5]	Morales-Conde S. A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(3): 261-267.
[6]	田甜，滕利，徐家杰, 等. 毫米波缓解颌面部术后软组织肿胀的临床研究[J]. 中国美容医学, 2012, 21(12): 2184-2187.
[7]	陈杰，那冬鸣，申英末, 等. 局部神经阻滞麻醉在腹股沟无张力疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2005, 20(2): 107-108.
[8]	陈杰，那冬鸣，申英末. 局部神经阻滞麻醉下的腹膜前腹股沟无张力疝修补术[JCD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2007, 1(2): 77-79.
[9]	于浩淼，白晓东，马立峰, 等. 环氧化酶2抑制剂帕瑞昔布、塞来昔布在TKA围手术期多模式镇痛中的效果研究[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2014, 9(6): 634-639.
[10]	王明刚，陈杰，刘素君, 等. 局部神经阻滞麻醉在老年腹股沟疝患者无张力修补术中的应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2008, 29(6): 770-772.
[11]	王帆，陈富强，申英末, 等. 罗哌卡因联合利多卡因与单纯利多卡因局部麻醉对成人腹股沟疝无张力修补术后镇痛效果的对比分析[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2016, 31(9): 736-738.
[12]	Chang CB, Cho WS. Pain management protocols, peri-operative pain and patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: a multicentrestudy[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2012, 94(11): 1511-1516.
[13]	陈妍. 老年患者疼痛控制护理对术后康复及并发症的影响[J]. 医药前沿, 2018, 8(18): 263-265.
[14]	Donati M, Brancato G, Giglio A, et al. Incidence of pain after inguinal hernia repair in the elderly. A retrospective historical cohort evaluation of 18-years' experience with a mesh & plug inguinal hernia repair method on about 3000 patients[J]. BMC Surg, 2013, 13(Suppl 2): S19.
[15]	邸宣，邱爽，刘丽宏. 成人腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛研究[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2015,(5): 57-61.
[16]	郭晓，王辰，陆朝阳. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后血清肿治疗的研究进展[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2018, 23(10): 798-800.
[17]	北京协和医院. 北京协和医院医疗诊疗常规: 物理医学康复科诊疗常规[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2004: 86-87.
[18]	杨朝辉，洪光祥，黄启顺, 等. 毫米波对周围神经部分损伤后神经修复的影响[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2006, 22(3): 174-176.
[19]	吴祈耀，屈大信，钦耀坤, 等. 毫米波医疗技术及其临床应用[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2010: 35-40, 100-103.
[20]	陈夏仙，李宁，朱民. 毫米波对乳腺癌患者术后创面愈合的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2008, 30(10): 686-687.
[21]	Chidichimo G, Beneduci A, Nicoletta M, et al. Selective inhibition of tumoral cells growth by low power millimeter waves[J]. Anticancer Res, 2002, 22(3): 1681-1688.
[22]	陈念永，张伟，赵勇. 低功率毫米波对人外周血淋巴细胞钙离子浓度及Ca2+/Mg2+/-ATP酶活性的影响[J]. 中华物理医学杂志, 1998, 20(1): 5-7.
[23]	Radzievsky AA, Rojavin MA, Cowan A, et al. Suppression of pain sensation caused by millimeter waves: a double-blinded, cross-over, prospective human volunteer study[J]. AnesthAnalg, 1999, 88(4): 836-840.

组别	例数	年龄(岁, ±s)	直疝/斜疝/复合疝(例)	左/右(例)	成形术/传统修补术(例)	择期/急诊(例)	无/有尿潴留(例)
毫米波组	28	80.0±7.2	4/1/23	10/18	28/0	27/1	23/5
对照组	42	79.4±6.5	13/6/23	19/23	37/5	38/4	34/8
t/ χ²值		0.365	5.767
P值		0.607	0.056	0.467	0.078	0.641	1.000

组别	例数	年龄(岁, ±s)	直疝/斜疝/复合疝(例)	左/右(例)	成形术/传统修补术(例)	择期/急诊(例)	无/有尿潴留(例)
毫米波组	28	80.0±7.2	4/1/23	10/18	28/0	27/1	23/5
对照组	42	79.4±6.5	13/6/23	19/23	37/5	38/4	34/8
t/ χ²值		0.365	5.767
P值		0.607	0.056	0.467	0.078	0.641	1.000

组别	例数	术后6 h	术后12 h	术后1 d	术后2 d	术后3 d	术后7 d
毫米波组	28	1.50±0.51	2.29±0.60	2.75±0.65	2.68±0.72	2.04±0.64	1.46±0.51
对照组	42	1.50±0.63	2.24±0.58	2.83±0.80	3.38±0.94	3.55±0.86	2.43±0.89
t值		0.000	0.333	0.595	0.145	0.010	0.012
P值		1.000	0.740	0.645	0.001	0.000	0.000

组别	例数	术后6 h	术后12 h	术后1 d	术后2 d	术后3 d	术后7 d
毫米波组	28	1.50±0.51	2.29±0.60	2.75±0.65	2.68±0.72	2.04±0.64	1.46±0.51
对照组	42	1.50±0.63	2.24±0.58	2.83±0.80	3.38±0.94	3.55±0.86	2.43±0.89
t值		0.000	0.333	0.595	0.145	0.010	0.012
P值		1.000	0.740	0.645	0.001	0.000	0.000

组别	例数	术后1 d	术后2 d	术后3 d	术后7 d
毫米波组	28	3.79±0.83	3.71±0.85	2.93±0.94	1.68±0.82
对照组	42	4.22±0.94	4.73±0.74	4.24±0.91	3.00±0.91
t值		0.751	0.250	0.691	0.638
P值		0.052	0.000	0.000	0.000

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export