Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04): 277-282. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.04.011

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Different effect of with and without mesh placement in inguinal canal on pain after Gilbert repair: A comparative study

Jing Wang1, Liping Zheng1, Chundong Hu1, Zhongcheng Zhou1, Jing Chen1, Shaohan Wu1, Zhengxiang Zhong1, Yiyu Shen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, China
  • Received:2017-12-26 Online:2018-08-18 Published:2018-08-18
  • Contact: Yiyu Shen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Shen Yiyu, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the different effect of with or without mesh placement in inguinal canal on pain after Gilbert repair.

Methods

From February 2014 to February 2017, 269 cases unilateral hernia underwent Gilbert repair in the second hospital of Jiaxing were divided into traditional Gilbert group (meshes were placed in preperitoneal space and in the inguinal canal) and modified Gilbert group (the mesh was placed in the preperitoneal space only). The postoperative short-term pain, postoperative chronic pain, incidence of different pain nature and recurrence rate during the short-term follow-up were compared between the two groups.

Results

And there were no significant differences in the recurrence rate between the two groups during the short-term follow-up period (P=1.000). In the traditional Gilbert group, there were 158 cases of short-term pain, of which 30 cases were moderate and 7 cases were severe. There were 44 cases of CPIP, of which 17 cases were moderate and 6 cases were severe. In the modified Gilbert group, there were 32 cases of short-term pain, of which 2 cases were moderate and 1 cases were severe. There were 4 cases of CPIP, of which 1 case were moderate and none was severe. The modified Gilbert group showed lower incidence of short-term moderate and severe pain, lower overall incidence of CPIP, lower incidence of moderate and severe CPIP, and lower incidence of CPIP induced by the activities than the traditional Gilbert group, the differences were statistically significant (P=0.034, 0.048, 0.036, 0.049).

Conclusion

The modified Gilbert which mesh is placed in preperitoneal space only without mesh placed in the inguinal canal can effectively reduce the incidence of moderate and severe pain in the short-term after Gilbert repair, the overall incidence of postoperative chronic pain, and the incidence of moderate and severe chronic pain after Gilbert repair, and the incidence of chronic pain induced by the activities after Gilbert repair. Moreover, it doesn't increase in the rate of hernia recurrence during the short-term in follow-up after Gilbert repair.

Key words: Hernia, inguinal, Preperitoneal repair, Gilbert, Chronic pain, Chronic postoperative inguinal pain

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-68665919 E-mail: zhshfbwkzz@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd