切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 326 -330. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.03.018

论著

超声引导下骶管阻滞与髂腹股沟及髂腹下神经阻滞用于小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的比较
李盼1, 韦登飞2, 乔克坤1, 李熊刚1,()   
  1. 1. 431700 湖北省天门市第一人民医院麻醉科
    2. 431700 湖北省天门市第一人民医院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-11 出版日期:2024-06-18
  • 通信作者: 李熊刚

Comparison of ultrasound-guided sacral canal block with ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block for pediatric laparoscopic high ligation of hernial sac

Pan Li1, Dengfei Wei2, Kekun Qiao1, Xionggang Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Tianmen City, Tianmen 431700, Hubei Province, China
    2. Department of Pediatrics, The First People's Hospital of Tianmen City, Tianmen 431700, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2023-08-11 Published:2024-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Xionggang Li
引用本文:

李盼, 韦登飞, 乔克坤, 李熊刚. 超声引导下骶管阻滞与髂腹股沟及髂腹下神经阻滞用于小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 326-330.

Pan Li, Dengfei Wei, Kekun Qiao, Xionggang Li. Comparison of ultrasound-guided sacral canal block with ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block for pediatric laparoscopic high ligation of hernial sac[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 326-330.

目的

探讨超声引导的骶管阻滞与髂腹股沟及髂腹下神经阻滞用于小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的临床效果。

方法

随机选取2021年10月至2022年10月在湖北省天门市第一人民医院因腹股沟疝住院进行手术的患儿80例(美国麻醉医师协会分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级),根据麻醉方式不同将患儿分为Ⅰ组(骶管阻滞组)和Ⅱ组(髂腹股沟及髂腹下神经阻滞组)。监测围手术期各时间节点2组患儿的心率、平均动脉压(MAP)的变化;记录围手术期麻醉效果以及术后不良反应发生情况;在患儿苏醒时,术后4、8、12 h进行疼痛评分和躁动评分。

结果

2组患儿在各时间点的心率、MAP比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后苏醒后2组患儿在各时间点的疼痛评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);Ⅱ组麻醉起效时间更快[(3.64±0.86)min比(12.47±2.75)min],手术结束后患儿躁动发生率Ⅱ组明显更少(7.5%比30%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患儿手术持续时间、麻醉苏醒时间、术中体动以及术后恶心呕吐、尿潴留、分泌物增多的发生情况比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

超声引导下骶管阻滞与髂腹股沟及髂腹下神经阻滞均可安全用于小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中,后者起效更快,患儿躁动发生更少,更能满足小儿手术要求。

Objective

To investigate the clinical results of ultrasound-guided sacral canal block and ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block for pediatric laparoscopic high ligation of hernial sac.

Methods

A randomized selection of 80 pediatric patients with inguinal hernia who underwent surgery at the First People's Hospital of Tianmen, Hubei Province, from October 2021 to October 2022 were included in the study (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I-II). The patients were divided into two groups based on the anesthesia method: Group I (caudal block) and Group II (ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block). The heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) of the two groups were monitored at various perioperative time points. Anesthesia efficacy and postoperative adverse reactions were recorded. Pain and agitation scores were assessed at awakening and at 4, 8, and 12 hours postoperatively.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of heart rate and MAP at various time points (P>0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences in pain scores at various postoperative time points (P>0.05). Group II exhibited a significantly faster onset of anesthesia [(3.64±0.86) minutes vs (12.47±2.75) minutes] and a lower incidence of postoperative agitation (7.5% vs 30%), both with statistical significance (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of surgery duration, anesthesia recovery time, intraoperative body movement, or the incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, or increased secretions (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Both ultrasound-guided caudal block and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block can be safely used in pediatric laparoscopic high ligation of hernial sac. The latter provides a faster onset of anesthesia and reduces the incidence of postoperative agitation, making it more suitable for pediatric surgical requirements.

表1 2组患儿一般资料比较
表2 2患儿围手术期各时间点心率、平均动脉压比较(±s
表3 2组患儿术后各时间点FLACC疼痛评分比较(分,±s
表4 2组患儿麻醉效果及术后不良反应比较
表5 2组患儿术后躁动及术中体动情况比较
[1]
张胜亮, 李卿明, 王祥龙, 等. 小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿疝的临床观察[J]. 沈阳药科大学学报, 2021, 38(S2): 22.
[2]
Karaca O, Pinar HU, Gokmen Z, et al. Ultrasound-guided versus conventional caudal block in children: a prospective randomized study[J]. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 2019, 29(6): 533-538.
[3]
Chen J, Song D, Zheng G, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of nerve block under ultrasound in ilioinguinal/ iliohypogastric in children[J]. Transl Pediatr, 2022, 11(10): 1604-1614.
[4]
刘光, 王会瑟. 氯胺酮静脉全身麻醉复合罗哌卡因骶管阻滞对腹股沟疝患儿术中应激反应的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(3): 226-230.
[5]
张广磊, 张平, 冯学会, 等. 超声引导下骶管阻滞在小儿腹腔镜下腹股沟疝手术中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(6): 982-985.
[6]
薛杭, 丁萌萌, 孙楠, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞与髂腹股沟及髂腹下神经阻滞在小儿腹股沟区手术应用的比较[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2016, 37(8): 705-709, 713.
[7]
王更娃, 米宏. 超声引导下髂腹股沟及髂腹下神经阻滞在小儿腹腔镜疝修补术麻醉中的应用观察[J]. 甘肃医药, 2015, 34(5): 359-361.
[8]
张原源, 周军. FLACC与CRIES疼痛评估量表用于婴幼儿术后疼痛评估的对比分析[J]. 医药论坛杂志, 2020, 41(2): 22-25.
[9]
Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Burke C, et al. The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2006, 16(3): 258-265.
[10]
杜鹃, 陈伟, 亢留玉, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在小儿腹腔镜下腹股沟疝手术中的作用[J]. 安徽医药, 2018, 22(4): 729-731.
[11]
吕毅, 吕波, 佟剑虹. 小儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与传统疝修补术的对比[J]. 智慧健康, 2017, 3(5): 109-110.
[12]
Teunkens A, Vermeulen K, Peters M, et al. Bupivacaine infiltration in children for postoperative analgesia after tonsillectomy: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2019, 36(3): 206-214.
[13]
王兵, 龙海曼, 郑水泉, 等. 小儿麻醉临床治疗中采用舒芬太尼联合丙泊酚治疗的效果评价[J]. 新疆医学, 2022, 52(8): 921-923, 937.
[14]
Tong Y, Ren H, Ding X, et al. Analgesic effect and adverse events of dexmedetomidine as additive for pediatric caudal anesthesia: a meta-analysis[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2014, 24(12): 1224-230.
[15]
Cicekcibasi AE, Borazan H, Arıcan S, et al. Where is the apex of the sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block in the pediatric population? A radio-anatomic study[J]. J Anesth, 2014, 28(4): 569-575.
[16]
王建功, 严军. 超声引导定位与传统解剖定位行臂丛神经阻滞的临床麻醉效果研究[J]. 中国社区医师, 2020, 36(16): 61-62.
[17]
王鸿志, 陈永权. 超声辅助与传统盲探在椎管内麻醉中的应用[J]. 安徽医药, 2020, 24(5): 854-859.
[18]
朱允涛, 田丹丹. 超声引导下髂腹下-髂腹股沟神经阻滞协同静吸复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝患儿手术中的应用价值[J]. 临床心身疾病杂志, 2021, 27(6): 31-35
[19]
梁纯, 余雨桦, 孙林峰. 小儿腹股沟疝术中采用超声引导下骶管阻滞的临床效果研究[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2022, 27(6): 1073-1074.
[20]
Husain NK, Ravalia A. Ultrasound-guided ilio-inguinal and rectus sheath nerve blocks[J]. Anaesthesia, 2006, 61(11): 1126.
[21]
Priyadarshini K, Behera BK, Tripathy BB, et al. Ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block, ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block, and quadratus lumborum block for elective open inguinal hernia repair in children: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2022, 47(4): 217-221.
[22]
Argo M, Favela J, Phung T, et al. Other forms of anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Am J Surg, 2019, 218(5): 1008-1015.
[23]
Bendtsen TF, Parras T, Moriggl B, et al. Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block at the entrance of the pudendal(alcock) canal: description of anatomy and clinical technique[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2016, 41(2): 140-145.
[24]
南洋. 超声引导下髂腹股沟及髂腹下神经阻滞在小儿麻醉的应用[D]. 温州: 温州医科大学, 2011.
[25]
吴云, 金啸, 叶松. 超声引导下髂腹股沟及髂腹下神经阻滞联合腹直肌鞘阻滞在腹腔镜小儿疝高位结扎术中的应用[J]. 医药导报, 2018, 37(8): 973-976.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?