切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 530 -534. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.05.007

论著

造口还纳术后切口疝的发生率及危险因素分析
毛永欢, 仝瀚文, 康星, 朱兴亚, 徐恩, 夏雪峰()   
  1. 210008 南京鼓楼医院普外科
    210008 南京鼓楼医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-20 出版日期:2023-10-18
  • 通信作者: 夏雪峰
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金(81501380); 南京市卫生科技发展专项资金项目,杰出青年基金项目(JQX19001)

Analysis of incidence and risk factors of incisional hernias after stoma closure

Yonghuan Mao, Hanwen Tong, Xing Kang, Xingya Zhu, En Xu, Xuefeng Xia()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing 210008, China
    Department of Emergency, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2022-10-20 Published:2023-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Xuefeng Xia
引用本文:

毛永欢, 仝瀚文, 康星, 朱兴亚, 徐恩, 夏雪峰. 造口还纳术后切口疝的发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-534.

Yonghuan Mao, Hanwen Tong, Xing Kang, Xingya Zhu, En Xu, Xuefeng Xia. Analysis of incidence and risk factors of incisional hernias after stoma closure[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 530-534.

目的

探究造口还纳术后原造口部位切口疝的发生率和危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析2015年7月至2019年12月南京鼓楼医院普外科行造口还纳术患者。记录患者一般资料(性别、年龄、体重指数、合并高血压病、合并糖尿病)、造口手术相关资料(第一次造口为急诊或择期手术、第一次造口是否腔镜手术、良性或恶性疾病造口、回肠或结肠造口、端式或袢式造口、术后造口旁疝)、造口还纳手术相关资料(手术时间、出血量、术后住院时间、术后切口感染、随访时间)、原造口处是否发生切口疝等指标。根据造口还纳术后原造口部位是否发生切口疝分为2组,采用单因素分析及多因素Logistic回归分析评估造口还纳术后发生切口疝的危险因素。

结果

共纳入89例患者分析,造口还纳术后原造口处切口疝发生率为23.6%(21例),其中9例行二次手术治疗,其他目前行保守治疗。单因素分析及多变量Logistic回归分析提示发生切口疝的独立危险因素包括:结肠造口(OR 7.161,95% CI 1.479~34.667,P=0.014)、年龄≥68岁(OR 1.093,95% CI 1.029~1.161,P=0.004)、急诊手术(OR 6.343,95% CI 1.663~24.190,P=0.007)。造口还纳术后发生切口疝患者体重指数较未发生切口疝患者高[(25.2±3.5)kg/m2 vs(23.2±2.8)kg/m2],差异有统计学意义(P=0.009)。

结论

造口还纳术后原部位常发生切口疝,往往需要二次手术处理,严重影响患者生活质量,增加其经济负担。结肠造口、年龄≥68岁和急诊手术是造口还纳术后再发切口疝的独立危险因素,对于这部分患者及体重指数≥25 kg/m2的患者,造口还纳术联合预防性补片置入术可作为临床治疗方案。

Objective

To investigate the incidence and risk factors of incisional hernias after stoma closure.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing ostomy reduction from July 2015 to December 2019 in the Department of General Surgery of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Gender, age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes, benign or malignant disease, ileostomy or colostomy, emergency or elective surgery, stoma (end type or loop type), ostomy was endoscopic or not, operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative incision infection, follow-up time, and whether incisional hernia occurred again at the original stoma were recorded. The risk factors for incisional hernia that occurred after stoma reduction were evaluated by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 89 patients were analyzed. The incidence of ostomy site incisional hernias after stoma closure was 23.6% (21 cases), of which 9 underwent surgical treatment and the others received conservative treatment. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that the independent risk factors for incisional hernia included: colostomy (OR 7.161, 95% CI 1.479-34.667, P=0.014), age ≥68 years (OR 1.093, 95% CI 1.029-1.161, P=0.004), emergency surgery (OR 6.343, 95% CI 1.663-24.190, P=0.007). The BMI of patients with incisional hernia after stoma closure was higher than that of patients without incisional hernia [(25.2±3.5) kg/m2 vs (23.2±2.8) kg/m2], and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.009).

Conclusion

Ostomy site incisional hernias after stoma closure often occurs, which often requires secondary surgical treatment, which seriously affects the quality of life of patients and increases the economic burden. Colostomy, age ≥68 years and emergency surgery are independent risk factors for incisional hernia. For these patients and patients with BMI≥25 kg/m2, stoma closure combined with preventive mesh implantation can be used as clinical treatment.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较[例(%)]
表2 2组患者造口手术相关资料比较[例(%)]
表3 2组患者造口还纳手术相关资料比较(±s
表4 造口还纳术后发生切口疝多因素分析
[1]
Amelung FJ, de Guerre LEVM, Consten ECJ, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for stoma-site incisional herniation after reversal[J]. BJS Open, 2018, 2(3): 128-134.
[2]
Alli VV, Zhang J, Telem DA. Impact of incisional hernia development following abdominal operations on total healthcare cost[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(5): 2381-2386.
[3]
吴立胜. 造口旁疝修补术的演变和焦点问题[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2022, 21(9): 1191-1196.
[4]
Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, Futaba K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure[J]. World J Surg, 2012, 36: 973-983.
[5]
Gachabayov M, Orujova L, Latifi LA et al. Use of Biologic Mesh for the Treatment and Prevention of Parastomal Hernias[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2020, 37, 115-119.
[6]
Eklov K., Viktorsson FZ, Frosztega E, et al. Hernia at the stoma site after loop ileostomy reversal[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2020, 35(5): 887-895.
[7]
Maggiori L, Moszkowicz D, Zappa M, et al. Bioprosthetic mesh reinforcement during temporary stoma closure decreases the rate of incisional hernia: a blinded, case-matched study in 94 patients with rectal cancer[J]. Surgery, 2015, 158: 1651-1657.
[8]
Chen W, Zhang Y, Qin H, et al. A pilot study on prophylactic tube enterostomy for the prevention of anastomotic leakage in patients with high-risk intestinal anastomosis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2022, 407(1): 267-275.
[9]
Peltrini R, Imperatore N, Altieri G, et al. Prevention of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure with different reinforcing mesh types: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(3): 639-648.
[10]
Tilney HS, Sains PS, Lovegrove RE, et al. Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses[J]. World J Surg, 2007, 31: 1142-1151.
[11]
Bhangu A, Fletcher L, Kingdon S, et al. A clinical and radiological assessment of incisional hernias following closure of temporary stomas[J]. Surgeon, 2012, 10: 321-325.
[12]
Rosen M, Bauer J, Harmaty M, et al. Multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study of the recurrence, surgical site infection, and quality of life after contaminated ventral hernia repair using biosynthetic absorbable mesh: the COBRA study[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265: 205-211.
[13]
Sharp SP, Francis JK, Valerian BT, et al. Incidence of Ostomy Site Incisional Hernias after Stoma Closure[J]. Am Surg, 2015, 81(12): 1244-1248.
[14]
De Robles MS, Bakhtiar A, Young CJ. Obesity is a significant risk factor for ileostomy site incisional hernia following reversal[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2019, 89(4): 399-402.
[15]
Kaneko T, Funahashi K, Ushigome M, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for incisional hernia after closure of temporary ileostomy for colorectal malignancy[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(4): 743-748.
[16]
Stabilini C, Garcia-Urena MA, Berrevoet F, et al. An evidence map and synthesis review with meta-analysis on the risk of incisional hernia in colorectal surgery with standard closure[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(2): 411-436.
[17]
Hirahara N, Tajima Y, Fujii Y, et al. Prediction of postoperative complications and survival after laparoscopic gastrectomy using preoperative Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in elderly gastric cancer patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(3): 1202-1209.
[18]
Chen C, Chen X, Chen J, et al. Association between Preoperative hs-crp/Albumin Ratio and Postoperative sirs in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study[J]. J Nutr Health Aging, 2022, 26(4): 352-359.
[19]
Brook AJ, Mansfield SD, Daniels IR, et al. Incisional hernia following closure of loop ileostomy: The main predictor is the patient, not the surgeon[J]. Surgeon, 2018, 16(1): 20-26.
[20]
顾岩, 唐健雄. 重视肥胖症对疝与腹壁外科疾病治疗的影响[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2022, 21(9): 1180-1184.
[21]
Lorenz A, Kogler P, Kafka-Ritsch R, et al. Incisional hernia at the site of stoma reversal-incidence and risk factors in a retrospective observational analysis[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2019, 34(7): 1179-1187.
[22]
Calvo Espino P, Sánchez Movilla A, Alonso Sebastian I, et al. Incidence and risk factors of delayed development for stoma site incisional hernia after ileostomy closure in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with temporary ileostomy[J]. Acta Chir Belg, 2022, 122(1): 41-47.
[23]
Mongelard K, Mynster T, Jensen KK. Toma-site hernia after stoma reversal following rectal cancer resection[J]. Dan Med J, 2020, 67(3): 743-751.
[24]
Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site(ROCSS) Collaborative and West Midlands Research Collaborative. Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site(ROCSS): a multicentre, randomized controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10222): 417-426.
[1] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[2] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[3] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[4] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[5] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[6] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[7] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[8] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[9] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[10] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[11] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[12] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[13] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[14] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要