切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01) : 42 -46. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.01.011

临床论著

完整剥离和横断疝囊在单侧腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前修补术中的疗效比较
杨斌1, 胡光太1, 周纲1,()   
  1. 1. 211100 南京医科大学附属江宁医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-03 出版日期:2023-02-18
  • 通信作者: 周纲

The efficacy of complete dissection of hernia sac and transection of hernia sac in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for unilateral indirect inguinal hernia

Bin Yang1, Guangtai Hu1, Gang Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. General Surgery Department of Jiangning Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211100, China
  • Received:2022-06-03 Published:2023-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Gang Zhou
引用本文:

杨斌, 胡光太, 周纲. 完整剥离和横断疝囊在单侧腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 42-46.

Bin Yang, Guangtai Hu, Gang Zhou. The efficacy of complete dissection of hernia sac and transection of hernia sac in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for unilateral indirect inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(01): 42-46.

目的

探讨完整剥离疝囊和横断疝囊在单侧腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)中的疗效。

方法

选取2020年3月至2021年3月南京医科大学附属江宁医院85例行TAPP的腹股沟斜疝患者作为研究对象,根据入院单双号分为横断组(43例)和剥离组(42例),其中横断组术中横断疝囊,剥离组完整剥离疝囊。比较2组一般手术情况,疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),氧化应激指标中生长激素、胰岛素、血糖和总抗氧化能力(T-AOC),血清免疫指标和术后并发症情况。

结果

横断组手术时间、腹股沟区积液、术中出血量及住院时间均显著优于剥离组(P<0.05);横断组术后1 d、3 d和1周VAS评分显著低于剥离组(P<0.05);横断组生长激素、胰岛素和T-AOC水平均显著高于剥离组(P<0.05),血糖水平显著低于剥离组(P<0.05);2组血清基质金属蛋白酶-2(MMP-2)、MMP-9、基质金属蛋白酶抑制剂-1(TIMP-1)和TIMP-2水平均较术前显著降低(P<0.05),2组术后血清免疫水平比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者术后血清肿、神经感觉异常和尿潴留等情况比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

完全剥离和横断疝囊在治疗单侧腹股沟斜疝中均具有良好的效果,但横断疝囊方式在减少手术时间,减轻患者疼痛及应激反应,加快康复方面具有更积极的作用。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of complete stripping of the hernia sac and transection of hernia sac in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) for unilateral indirect inguinal hernia.

Methods

From March 2020 to March 2021, 85 patients with indirect inguinal hernia who underwent TAPP in Jiangning Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing Medical University were selected as the research subjects. According to the odd and even numbers of admissions, they were divided into a transection group (43 cases) and a dissection group (42 cases). The general surgical conditions, pain indexes, oxidative stress indexes such as growth hormone (GH), insulin (InS), blood sugar (BS) and total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), serum immune indexes and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time, inguinal effusion, intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization time in the transection group were significantly better than those in the dissection group (P<0.05); The degree of pain in the transection group 1 d, 3 d and 1 week after the operation was significantly lower than that in the dissection group (P<0.05); The levels of GH, InS and T-AOC in the transection group were significantly higher than those in the dissection group (P<0.05), and the level of BS was significantly lower than that in the dissection group (P<0.05); Serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), MMP-9, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) and TIMP-2 in the two groups significantly decreased compared with those before the operation (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in serum levels between the two groups after the surgery (P>0.05); There were no significant differences in postoperative seroma, neuroparesthesia and urinary retention between 2 groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Both complete dissection and transection of the hernia sac have good efficacy in the treatment of unilateral inguinal hernia, but transection of the hernia sac plays a more positive role in reducing the operation time, alleviating the pain of patients, alleviating the stress response, and expediting the recovery of patients.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者手术情况比较(±s
表3 2组患者视觉模拟评分比较(分,±s
表4 2组患者氧化应激水平比较(±s
表5 2组患者血清免疫指标比较(μg/L,±s
表6 2组患者术后并发症情况[例(%)]
[1]
曹羽, 龚航军, 韩刚, 等. 单侧腹股沟斜疝完全剥离疝囊术和横断疝囊术治疗的效果观察[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2022, 58(4): 27-30.
[2]
陈英, 崔明, 冯晨, 等. TAPP术中腹股沟直疝假性疝囊的不同处理方式的临床研究[J]. 西南国防医药, 2019, 29(10): 1027-1028.
[3]
茹东跃, 陈德兴. 腹膜前间隙解剖结构在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2020, 237(12): 61-63.
[4]
肖田, 余运运, 曹匡纬, 等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术治疗腹股沟斜疝患儿的疗效及对血清炎性指标和免疫功能的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2021, 21(21): 5-9.
[5]
莫健文, 苏惠贞, 董烈斌, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中腹膜破裂的处理方式[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(5): 69-71.
[6]
唐健雄, 郑民华, 陈杰,等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术操作指南(2017版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(11): 1238-1242.
[7]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J].中国普通外科杂志, 2018, 27(7):803-807.
[8]
Zhifeng M, Yuanfei T, Hanzhong H, et al. Development and current status of treatment for pediatric indirect inguinal hernia[J]. Medical Research, 2020, 2(2): 1-8.
[9]
王伟. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术术中对Ⅲ型腹股沟斜疝疝囊采用完全剥离与横断处理的临床观察[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2020, 17(8): 52-55.
[10]
Sayed S, Zayat I E, Abd El Hady H G, et al. Laparoscopic Totally Extra-peritoneal Hernioplasty versus Lichtenstein Open Tension Free Mesh Repair for Inguinal Hernia[J]. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2021, 83(1): 1364-1369.
[11]
张军民, 吴其肯, 夏龙飞. 单孔疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝术后复发的影响因素[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(10): 32-36.
[12]
蒋会勇, 马春, 蔡相军. 全腹腔镜完全腹膜外造口旁疝修补术的初步临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(12): 1313-1317.
[13]
Liu J, Wu X W, Xiu W L, et al. A comparative study examining laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair in children: a retrospective study from a single center in China[J]. BMC Surgery, 2020, 20(1): 1-8.
[14]
Li W, Li Y, Ding L, et al. A randomized study on laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with hernia sac transection vs complete sac reduction[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(4): 1882-1886.
[15]
许华, 胡明超, 顾建春. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝中处理疝囊方式的应用效果研究[J]. 腹部外科, 2022, 35(5): 44-47.
[16]
Luk Y, Chau P L, Law T T, et al. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal groin hernia repair in females: comparison of outcomes between preservation or division of the uterine round ligament[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2021, 31(1): 6-10.
[17]
陈思明, 李楠, 王月香, 等. 超声引导下注药治疗腹股沟疝术后疼痛的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 3(2): 142-145.
[18]
Zhao F, Wu G, Wu Y, et al. Electroacupuncture Ameliorates Motor Dysfunction via Inhibiting p66Shc-Associated Oxidative Stress and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Rats with Spinal Cord Injury[J]. Biology, 2020,14(22):146-152.
[19]
贺朝, 赵哲. 3D高清腹腔镜辅助治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的可行性及注水疝气针在小儿腹股沟斜疝疝囊高位结扎术中的应用[J]. 贵州医药, 2022, 46(1): 92-93.
[20]
何佩娜. 腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎联合脐正中襞覆盖修补对小儿单侧腹股沟斜疝术后复发的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2021, 38(8): 13-16.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[4] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[6] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10] 李三祥, 李佳, 刘俊峰, 吕东晨, 方晖东, 谭朝晖, 刘杰, 潘佐, 乔建坤. 基于CT影像的三维重建成像技术在腹腔镜大肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 570-574.
[11] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[12] 汪帮琦, 陈波特, 林浩坚, 许晖阳, 王镇伟, 袁雪峰, 林康健, 邱晓拂. 经腹入路3D腹腔镜联合输尿管硬镜同期处理肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻并肾盏结石的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 597-600.
[13] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[14] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
[15] 张敏洁, 张小杉, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 赵捷, 白天昊, 王雅晳. 氢气治疗心肌缺血再灌注损伤的作用机制及展望[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 744-748.
阅读次数
全文


摘要