切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 401 -405. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.04.006

临床论著

经腹腹膜前疝修补术后腹内疝性肠梗阻的发生情况及其影响因素分析
胡静1,(), 范敏娟1, 迟贯华1   
  1. 1. 100176 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院特需病房
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-22 出版日期:2022-08-18
  • 通信作者: 胡静

Analysis of the occurrence and influencing factors of intra-abdominal herniated intestinal obstruction after TAPP operation

Jing Hu1,(), Minjuan Fan1, Guanhua Chi1   

  1. 1. Special Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100176, China
  • Received:2022-02-22 Published:2022-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Jing Hu
引用本文:

胡静, 范敏娟, 迟贯华. 经腹腹膜前疝修补术后腹内疝性肠梗阻的发生情况及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 401-405.

Jing Hu, Minjuan Fan, Guanhua Chi. Analysis of the occurrence and influencing factors of intra-abdominal herniated intestinal obstruction after TAPP operation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 401-405.

目的

分析腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)后腹内疝性肠梗阻的发生情况及其影响因素。

方法

选取2018年1月至2021年12月北京同仁医院收治的404例腹股沟疝行TAPP术后患者作为研究对象,根据腹内疝性肠梗阻的发生情况将其分为发生组(38例)和未发生组(366例),分析所选腹股沟疝行TAPP术后患者的临床资料,采用单因素和Logistic回归分析筛选腹股沟疝患者行TAPP术后发生腹内疝性肠梗阻的影响因素。

结果

404例患者术后发生腹内疝性肠梗阻38例(9.41%);2组患者临床资料对比显示年龄、体质量指数(BMI)、疝囊直径、是否嵌顿疝、手术时间以及术中出血量等资料比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);Logistic回归分析结果表明,BMI>24 kg/m2OR=3.278,95% CI:1.561~6.886,P=0.002)、疝囊直径>5 cm(OR=3.353,95% CI:1.602~7.022,P=0.001)、嵌顿疝(OR=3.208,95% CI:1.546~6.657,P=0.002)、手术时间>100 min(OR=2.437,95% CI:1.174~5.058,P=0.017)、术中出血量>10 ml(OR=2.733,95% CI:1.303~5.735,P=0.008)是TAPP术后发生腹内疝性肠梗阻的独立危险因素。

结论

BMI>24 kg/m2、疝囊直径>5 cm、嵌顿疝、手术时间>100 min、术中出血量>10 ml是TAPP术后发生腹内疝性肠梗阻的独立危险因素,医务人员可以通过危险因素尽早识别高风险患者,还可对可以控制的危险因素给予一定的干预措施,以最大能力防止腹内疝性肠梗阻的发生。

Objective

To analyze the occurrence and influencing factors of intra-abdominal herniated intestinal obstruction after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP).

Methods

A total of 404 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent TAPP in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2021 were selected as the research subjects, and they were divided into the occurrence group according to the occurrence of intra-abdominal herniated intestinal obstruction (n=38). The clinical data of selected patients with inguinal hernia after TAPP and the non-incident group (n=366) were analyzed, and univariate and Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the influencing factors of intra-abdominal herniated intestinal obstruction in patients with inguinal hernia after TAPP.

Results

A total of 404 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent TAPP were included in this study. Among them, 38 patients had intra-abdominal herniated intestinal obstruction after operation, and the incidence rate was 9.41%. The comparison of clinical data between the two groups showed that the age, body mass index (BMI), diameter of hernia sac, incarcerated hernia, operation time and intraoperative blood loss were compared, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); Logistic regression analysis showed that BMI>24 kg/m2 (OR=3.278, 95% CI: 1.561-6.886, P=0.002), hernia sac diameter>5 cm (OR=3.353, 95% CI: 1.602-7.022, P=0.001), incarcerated hernia (OR=3.208, 95% CI: 1.546-6.657, P=0.002), operation time>100 min (OR=2.437, 95% CI: 1.174-5.058, P=0.017), intraoperative blood loss>10 ml (OR=2.733, 95% CI: 1.303-5.735, P=0.008) intra-abdominal hernia after TAPP independent risk factors for intestinal obstruction.

Conclusion

BMI>24 kg/m2, diameter of hernia sac>5 cm, incarcerated hernia, operation time>100 min, intraoperative blood loss>10 ml are independent risk factors for intra-abdominal hernia ileus after TAPP operation. To identify high-risk inguinal hernia patients as soon as possible with laparoscopic TAPP while also providing certain intervention measures to controllable risk factors to prevent the occurrence of intra-abdominal herniated intestinal obstruction to the greatest extent possible.

表1 2组患者参数资料单因素分析
表2 经腹腹膜前疝修补术后发生腹内疝性肠梗阻影响因素的Logistic回归分析的变量赋值表
表3 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后发生腹内疝性肠梗阻影响因素的Logistic回归分析
[1]
孟令宽,傅鑫,陈东风, 等. 2011年至2021年我国416例腹内疝性肠梗阻患者临床特征及相关因素的分析[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2022, 31(1): 22-27.
[2]
葛权昌,冷梅娜,齐兴芹, 等. 螺旋CT鉴别术后粘连性腹内疝及肠梗阻的价值[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2020, 30(6): 1041-1044.
[3]
侯启圣,刘珵,刘斯, 等. 36例腹内疝致急性肠梗阻的临床特点分析[J]. 中国急救医学, 2020, 40(2): 128-131.
[4]
李坤,赵丽君,曹廷宝, 等. 腹内疝性肠梗阻的临床诊断与治疗[J]. 中国临床研究, 2019, 32(9): 1246-1248.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(7): 721-724.
[6]
张绪锋,陈春雷. 腹股沟疝术后并发症的防治研究进展[J]. 广东医科大学学报, 2021, 39(6): 765-769.
[7]
Scheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, et al. Transabdominal preperitoneal(TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. BMC Surg, 2017, 17(1): 55.
[8]
Iraniha A, Peloquin J. Long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair[J]. J Robot Surg, 2018, 12(2): 261-269.
[9]
高峰,赵明一,林俊青, 等. 腹腔镜TAPP与开放TIPP修补腹股沟疝后患者疼痛及异物感的比较[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2019, 46(5): 311-314.
[10]
Schmitz R, Willeke F, Barr J, et al. Robotic inguinal hernia repair(TAPP) first experience with the new senhance robotic system[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2019, 34: 243-249.
[11]
Mancini R, Pattaro G, Spaziani E. Laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal(TAPP) surgery for incarcerated inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(2): 261-266.
[12]
Quezada N, Maturana G, Pimentel E, et al. Simultaneous TAPP inguinal repair and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a case series[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(1): 119-123.
[13]
史成宇,于洋洋,孙文菊, 等. 补片疝修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝疗效的对比[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2020, 23(3): 215-217, 225.
[14]
刘兵,李苹,朱玫烨, 等. 决策树模型与logistic回归模型在胃癌高危人群干预效果影响因素分析中的应用[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2018, 35(1): 70-73.
[15]
高大爽,项本宏. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效及术后并发症的危险因素分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(7): 492-496, 500.
[16]
朱共元,杨四清,宁海文, 等. TAPP术后并发症的危险因素分析[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2019, 12(1): 57-59.
[17]
陈昕,徐露,殷骏, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床疗效及术后并发症危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16(9): 915-920.
[18]
彭晶晶,陶峰,陈红波. 剖宫产术后肠梗阻的相关危险因素分析[J]. 安徽医学, 2020, 41(1): 17-20.
[19]
崔士和,朱慧杰,马正良. 机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者术后肠梗阻的危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2020, 100(34): 2652-2657.
[20]
严辉弟,周立新,王茂林, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的临床特征及危险因素分析[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2019, 26(2): 180-184.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要