切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 350 -353. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.03.022

护理论著

改进后临床护理路径在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用
徐桂娥1,(), 方磊2, 陈婷婷2   
  1. 1. 246003 安徽医科大学附属安庆第一人民医院护理部
    2. 246003 安徽医科大学附属安庆第一人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-26 出版日期:2022-06-20
  • 通信作者: 徐桂娥
  • 基金资助:
    安庆市科学技术局项目(018z0010)

Application of improved clinical nursing approach in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Guie Xu1,(), Lei Fang2, Tingting Chen2   

  1. 1. Nursing Department, Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anqing 246003, Anhui Province, China
    2. Department of Gastrointestinal surgery, Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anqing 246003, Anhui Province, China
  • Received:2021-12-26 Published:2022-06-20
  • Corresponding author: Guie Xu
引用本文:

徐桂娥, 方磊, 陈婷婷. 改进后临床护理路径在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 350-353.

Guie Xu, Lei Fang, Tingting Chen. Application of improved clinical nursing approach in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 350-353.

目的

探讨改进后临床护理路径在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用。

方法

选择2020年6月至2021年5月于安庆市第一人民医院收治的72例拟行腹腔镜疝修补术的腹股沟疝患者作为研究对象,按照护理方式不同分为2组,每组患者36例。对照组采用改进前临床护理路径,试验组采用改进后临床护理路径。评估2组患者术后的疼痛程度、生活质量,对比2组患者的首次肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、住院时间,分析2组患者的护理满意度、并发症发生率。

结果

术后3、6 h,试验组患者的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05);术后12 h,2组患者的VAS评分无统计学差异(P>0.05);试验组患者的下床活动时间、肛门排气时间、住院时间均明显低于对照组,总体健康、生理功能、生理职能、躯体角色评分均明显高于对照组(P<0.05);试验组患者的护理满意度(97.22%)明显高于对照组(83.33%),并发症发生率(8.33%)明显低于对照组(30.56%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

改进后临床护理路径可有效缓解腹股沟疝患者行腹腔镜疝修补术后的疼痛,促进患者术后康复,并提高护理满意度,减少并发症。

Objective

To explore the application of an improved clinical nursing approach in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

72 patients with inguinal hernia who planned to undergo laparoscopic hernia repair in our department of Anqing First People's Hospital from June 2020 to May 2021 were selected as the research objects, The patients were divided into two groups on average. The control group (36 cases) adopted the improved clinical nursing path, and the experimental group (36 cases) adopted the improved clinical nursing path. The postoperative pain degree and quality of life of patients in the two groups were evaluated, the time of first anal exhaust, the time of getting out of bed and the length of hospital stay of patients in the two groups were compared, and the nursing satisfaction and complication rate of patients in the two groups were analyzed.

Results

The VAS score of experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group at 3 and 6 hours after surgery (P<0.05). 12 hours after surgery, there was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups (P>0.05). The activity time of getting out of bed, the time of anal exhaust and the length of hospital stay of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the overall health, physiological function, physiological function and body role scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the experimental group (97.22%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (83.33%), and the complication rate (8.33%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (30.56%; P<0.05).

Conclusion

The improved clinical nursing path can effectively relieve the pain of patients with inguinal hernia after laparoscopic hernia repair, promote patients' postoperative recovery, improve nursing satisfaction, and reduce complications.

表1 2组患者VAS评分比较(分,±s
表2 2组患者下床活动时间、肛门排气时间及住院时间比较(±s
表3 2组患者生活质量评分比较(分,±s
表4 2组患者护理满意度比较
表5 2组患者并发症发生率比较(例)
[1]
胡海斌. 补中益气汤辅助无张力疝气修补术治疗腹股沟疝患者的临床观察[J]. 中国民间疗法, 2020, 28(7): 51-53.
[2]
杨柳. 舒适度护理在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中的应用[J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2017, 10(17): 161-162.
[3]
廖玉琼, 易丹, 米雪中. 改进后护理临床路径在日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用评价[J]. 中国医药科学, 2017, 7(22): 130-132.
[4]
杨美玲. 临床护理路径在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术围手术期的临床效果及对VAS的影响[J]. 中国医药指南, 2019, 17(32): 265-266.
[5]
朱建平, 梁麦映. 全程优质护理干预对腹腔镜肝切除术患者术后恢复及深静脉血栓形成的影响[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2022, 28(5): 868-869.
[6]
Monzou BI, Fingleson LM, Moeng MS. Surgical rib fixation as an alternative method of treatment for multiple rib fractures: an audit of results compared with traditional medical management[J]. S Afr J Surg, 2021, 59(3): 86-89.
[7]
吕春子, 朱丽瑜, 陈壮容, 等. SF-36评分在颈源性头痛低温等离子消融术后患者生活质量评价中的应用[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2019, 18(8): 824-827.
[8]
Deng A, Zhang Y, Xiong R. Effects of a transitional care program for individuals with limbs disabilities living in a rural community: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Disabil Health J, 2021, 14(1): 100946.
[9]
杨薇, 袁利玲, 王莉. 中西医结合延续护理对强直性脊柱炎患者生存质量的影响[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(3): 396-400.
[10]
田云霞. 责任制护理在下肢深静脉血栓溶栓治疗护理中的应用及对患者并发症发生的影响[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2022, 28(6): 1051-1052.
[11]
Vogel R, McGraw C, Orlando A, et al. Examining satisfaction of older adult patients and their caregivers following traumatic injury: a cross-sectional study of three level I trauma centres[J]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9(11): e032374.
[12]
国擎. 腹腔镜下全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的临床效果观察[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2021, 27(8): 105-106.
[13]
卢巧萍, 张翠花, 赖燕蓉. 舒适护理实施在腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术围术期的效果观察[J]. 黑龙江中医药, 2021, 50(2): 274-275.
[14]
陈宁. 临床护理路径对胆囊结石腹腔镜手术患者胃肠功能及并发症的影响分析[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2021, 32(9): 1502-1504.
[15]
王祎. 临床护理路径在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术围手术期中的应用价值分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2018, 16(33): 200.
[16]
Jiang H, Zhou Y, Gu Y, et al. Effect of Programmed nursing on nursing quality and postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in general surgery[J]. Nurs Sci, 2019, 8(5): 359-363.
[17]
Ding Y. Effect of rapid rehabilitation surgical nursing on operative stress and postoperative recovery in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Nurs Sci, 2019, 8(2): 162-167.
[18]
李会英, 吴庆珠, 吴燕, 等. 快速康复外科理念与临床护理路径相结合的综合诊疗模式在产科围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2020, 36(21): 1644-1647.
[19]
邵薇薇, 张勇, 王辉, 等. 基于快速康复外科理念的临床护理路径在肾上腺肿瘤患者中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2020, 26(34): 4788-4792.
[20]
刘俊青, 邱怀玉, 胡敏蝶, 等. 临床护理路径应用于成年男性腹腔镜腹股沟疝无张力修补术围手术期的效果评价[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2018, 18(2): 233-236.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要