切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 325 -329. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.03.018

临床论著

儿童斜疝腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术后复发的个体化风险预测模型的建立
王丽丽1, 李万富1,(), 王晶1, 江亚枝1, 胡瑞瑞1   
  1. 1. 830054 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院小儿普外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-06 出版日期:2022-06-20
  • 通信作者: 李万富

Establishment of an individualized model for predicting the risk of recurrence after laparoscopic high ligation of indirect hernia sac in children

Lili Wang1, Wanfu Li1,(), Jing Wang1, Yazhi Jiang1, Ruirui Hu1   

  1. 1. Pediatric General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
  • Received:2021-09-06 Published:2022-06-20
  • Corresponding author: Wanfu Li
引用本文:

王丽丽, 李万富, 王晶, 江亚枝, 胡瑞瑞. 儿童斜疝腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术后复发的个体化风险预测模型的建立[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 325-329.

Lili Wang, Wanfu Li, Jing Wang, Yazhi Jiang, Ruirui Hu. Establishment of an individualized model for predicting the risk of recurrence after laparoscopic high ligation of indirect hernia sac in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 325-329.

目的

探究个体化预测腹腔镜下儿童斜疝疝囊高位结扎术后复发的风险预测模型的建立。

方法

收集2017年10月至2019年10月于新疆医科大学第一附属医院行腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的腹股沟斜疝194例患儿的临床资料。基于是否复发将患儿分为复发组(31例)和未复发组(163例),复发组患儿均采取开放式疝囊高位结扎术进行二次手术治疗。采用单因素和Logistic回归多因素分析术后复发的危险因素,并建立相关列线图模型。

结果

单因素分析显示:2组性别、病程、是否合并隐匿疝、有无嵌顿疝、是否疝环粘连、发病部位、疝囊大小资料间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组年龄、小儿肥胖症、内环口大小和结扎线类型间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示:年龄≥6岁、小儿肥胖症、内环口大小≥3 cm、可吸收线结扎是腹腔镜下儿童斜疝疝囊高位结扎术后复发的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。模型验证结果显示:C-index为0.744,校准曲线趋近于理想曲线,表明具有良好的预测精度,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.760(95% CI:0.715~0.803),表明具有良好的区分度。

结论

临床应对年龄≥6岁、小儿肥胖症、内环口大小≥3 cm、可吸收线结扎的腹股沟斜疝患儿予以重视,警惕其在腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术后出现复发,据此建立的列线图模型能够有效预测腹腔镜下儿童斜疝疝囊高位结扎术后的复发风险。

Objective

To explore the establishment of an individualized prediction model for the risk of recurrence after laparoscopic high ligation of indirect hernia sac in children.

Methods

The clinical data of 194 children with indirect inguinal hernia who underwent laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from October 2017 to October 2019 were collected. The children were divided into recurrence group (31 cases) and no recurrence group (163 cases) based on whether they had recurrence. All children in the recurrence group were treated with a second open high ligation of hernia sac. The risk factors of postoperative recurrence were analyzed using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression, and the related nomogram model was established.

Results

Univariate analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups in sex, course of disease, occult hernia, incarcerated hernia, hernia ring adhesion, location of disease and hernia sac size (P>0.05). There were significant differences in age, childhood obesity, inner ring size and ligation suture type between the two groups (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥6 years old, childhood obesity, internal ring size ≥3 cm and absorbable suture ligation were independent risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic high ligation of indirect hernia sac in children (P<0.05). The model verification results show that the C-index is 0.744, the correction curve is close to the ideal curve, indicating a good prediction accuracy. The area under the ROC curve is 0.760 (95% CI: 0.715-0.803), indicating good discrimination.

Conclusion

Attention should be paid to children with indirect inguinal hernia who aged ≥6 years, with obesity, whose inner ring size is ≥3 cm and who had absorbable suture ligation. They should be vigilant about their recurrence after laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac. The nomogram model can effectively predict the risk of recurrence after laparoscopic high ligation of indirect hernia sac in children.

表1 腹腔镜下儿童斜疝疝囊高位结扎术后复发的单因素分析(例)
表2 腹腔镜下儿童斜疝疝囊高位结扎术后复发的多因素Logistic回归分析
图1 预测腹腔镜下儿童斜疝疝囊高位结扎术后复发风险的列线图模型
图2 列线图模型的校准曲线
图3 列线图模型的受试者工作特征曲线
[1]
Somuncu S, Somuncu ÖS, Ballica B, et al. Deficiency of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Causes Child Indirect Inguinal Hernia[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2019, 55(4): 665-671.
[2]
朱琳琳, 徐伟珏, 刘江斌, 等. 儿童腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术与传统疝囊高位结扎术的疗效对比分析[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2019, 40(2): 122-126.
[3]
Rajapandian S, Bhushan C, Sabnis SC, et al. Single incision multiport versus conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a matched comparison[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2018, 14(1): 44-51.
[4]
孙传成, 王亮, 苏义林, 等. 腹腔镜小儿疝囊高位结扎术后复发原因分析及再手术对策[J]. 安徽医学, 2020, 41(9): 1074-1076.
[5]
李三石, 李从军, 代景友. 腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎联合脐正中襞修补术与传统手术对小儿腹股沟斜疝术后复发率的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2020, 19(17): 1888-1891.
[6]
程晨, 吴云桦, 徐正水, 等. Ⅱ~Ⅲ期结肠癌根治术后复发危险因素分析及其列线图预测模型的应用价值[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2021, 20(3): 331-338.
[7]
Ji D, Zhang D, Xu J, et al. Prediction for progression risk in patients with covid-19 pneumonia: the CALL score[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2020, 71(6): 1393-1399.
[8]
中华医学会. 临床诊疗指南-小儿外科分册[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2005: 226-230.
[9]
赵亚茹, 张帆. 小儿肥胖诊断标准[J]中国实用儿科杂志, 2004, 19(3): 130-132.
[10]
Alzahem A. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniotomy in infants and children: a meta·analysis[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 201l, 27(6): 605-612.
[11]
张军民, 吴其肯, 夏龙飞. 单孔疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝术后复发的影响因素[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(10): 2293-2295.
[12]
Grimsby GM, Keays MA, VRlanueva C, et a1. Non-absorbable sutures are associated with lower recurrence rates in laparoscopic percutaneous inguinal hernia ligation[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2015, 11(5): 275. e1-4.
[13]
宣晓琪, 于忠勤, 徐建国, 等. 斜疝患儿行腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术后的复发及危险因素分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(10): 1253-1257.
[14]
顾岩, 张鹏, 李航宇, 等. 肥胖合并腹壁疝外科治疗中国专家共识(2021版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(4): 361-366.
[15]
刘奎, 王瑛, 李正伟. 腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎治疗小儿腹股沟疝术后复发的相关因素[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2017, 37(12): 2561-2565.
[16]
彭永辉, 黎灿强, 林伟斌, 等. 持针式单孔法治疗小儿疝的解剖学基础与手术技巧[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016, 34(1): 100-103.
[17]
Blatnik JA, Harth KC, Krpata DM, et al. Stitch versus searevaluation of laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair: a pilot study in a rabbit model[J]. J Laparoendose Adv Surg Tech A, 2012, 22(8): 848-851.
[18]
杨玉莲, 张家栩, 谭燕, 等. 腹腔镜下小儿斜疝疝囊高位结扎术后复发危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(5): 437-439.
[19]
中华医学会外科学分会. 腹腔镜疝与腹壁外科手术缝合技术与缝合材料选择中国专家共识(2021版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(5): 515-523.
[20]
徐礼治. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术术后浆液肿发生影响因素分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2019, 48(23): 4119-4121.
[21]
赵曦, 张子通, 牛靖志, 等. 小儿腹股沟嵌顿性斜疝腹腔镜治疗体会[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2013, 18(6): 459-460.
[22]
曾江东, 张艺萍, 莫健文, 等. 腹腔镜下脐内侧襞联同髂耻束修补小儿巨大腹股沟疝的体会[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2019, 24(12): 957-959.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[3] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[4] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[5] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[6] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[7] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[8] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[9] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[10] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[11] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[12] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[13] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[14] 陆猛桂, 黄斌, 李秋林, 何媛梅. 蜂蛰伤患者发生多器官功能障碍综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1010-1015.
[15] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
阅读次数
全文


摘要