切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 290 -293. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.03.010

临床论著

腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝及长期疗效的评估
王志华1, 常亚男2, 罗冰清2, 刘文鹏3, 席江伟2, 王新波2,()   
  1. 1. 075100 河北张家口,河北北方学院附属第二医院体检科
    2. 075100 河北张家口,河北北方学院附属第二医院普外科
    3. 050051 石家庄,河北医科大学第三医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-03 出版日期:2022-06-20
  • 通信作者: 王新波
  • 基金资助:
    河北省科技计划项目(182777204)

Predictive significance of long-term efficacy of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair combined with Nissen/Dor fundoplication for hiatal hernia

Zhihua Wang1, Yanan Chang2, Bingqing Luo2, Wenpeng Liu3, Jiangwei Xi2, Xinbo Wang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Physical Examination, Second Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075100, Hebei Province, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075100, Hebei Province, China
    3. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
  • Received:2021-02-03 Published:2022-06-20
  • Corresponding author: Xinbo Wang
引用本文:

王志华, 常亚男, 罗冰清, 刘文鹏, 席江伟, 王新波. 腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝及长期疗效的评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 290-293.

Zhihua Wang, Yanan Chang, Bingqing Luo, Wenpeng Liu, Jiangwei Xi, Xinbo Wang. Predictive significance of long-term efficacy of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair combined with Nissen/Dor fundoplication for hiatal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 290-293.

目的

观察分析腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补联合Nissen/Dor胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝临床疗效及食管测压与pH值监测对长期疗效的预估意义。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年1月于河北北方学院附属第二医院收治的120例食管裂孔疝患者的临床资料,其中64例行腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补联合Nissen胃底折叠术(Nissen组),56例行腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补联合Dor胃底折叠术(Dor组)。术后随访1年,对比观察2组患者手术情况、住院时间、术后并发症、记录食管测压及pH检测等指标变化情况、Gerd Q、DeMeester评分等。

结果

Nissen组术程以及术中出血量明显高于Dor组(P<0.05),2组总住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者术后总并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者术后1年食管反流情况与DeMeester评分较术前均得到明显改善。Nissen组在减少反流次数、长反流次数和最长反流时间方面均优于Dor组(P<0.05)。2组在反流时间、酸反流时间百分比与DeMeester评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后2组患者食管下括约肌压力、静息呼吸平均值、食管残余压较术前均显著提升(P<0.05),但2组间术后比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。术后2组患者食管松弛率、无效吞咽与Gerd Q评分均较术前也均明显降低,但2组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜疝修补术联合Nissen或Dor胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝均有明显效果,临床应根据患者自身情况选择合适的手术方式。

Objective

To observe and analyze the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair combined with Dor fundoplication in the treatment of hiatal hernia and the predictive significance of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring on long-term effectiveness.

Methods

The clinical data of 120 patients with hiatal hernia admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Northern University from January 2018 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, of which 64 patients underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair combined with Nissen fundoplication (Nissen group), 56 cases underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair combined with Dor fundoplication (Dor group). The patients were followed up for 1 year after the operation, and the operation conditions, hospitalization time, postoperative complications, changes in esophageal manometry and pH detection, and Gerd Q and DeMeester scores were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation course and intraoperative blood loss in the Nissen group were significantly higher than those in the Dor group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the total hospitalization time between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of total postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05); the esophageal reflux and DeMeester scores of the two groups at 1 year after operation were significantly improved compared with those before operation. The Nissen group was better than the Dor group in reducing the number of regurgitations, the length of regurgitation and the longest regurgitation time (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the reflux time, acid reflux time percentage and DeMeester score between the two groups (P>0.05); the lower esophageal sphincter pressure, resting breath average value and esophageal residual pressure in the two groups after operation were significantly increased compared with those before operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups after surgery (P>0.05). The esophageal relaxation rate, invalid swallowing and Gerd Q score of the two groups after operation were also significantly lower than those before operation, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic hernia repair combined with Nissen or Dor fundoplication has an obvious effect in the treatment of hiatal hernia, and the appropriate surgical method should be selected according to the patient's own situation.

表1 2组患者基线资料比较
表2 2组患者术中及术后并发症发生情况比较
表3 2组患者术前和术后1年食管反流与DeMeester评分比较(±s
表4 2组患者术前和术后1年食管测压与GerdQ评分比较(±s
[1]
何岚, 郑松柏. 老年食管裂孔疝的诊治进展[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2021, 27(6): 1332-1335.
[2]
张海静, 胡海清. 食管裂孔疝诊治进展[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2020, 7(1): 33-38.
[3]
李超斌, 谢佳平. 食管裂孔疝、胃食管阀瓣与胃食管反流病[J]. 山东医药, 2010, 50(15): 110-111.
[4]
赵磊. 腹腔镜下Nissen胃底折叠术联合食管裂孔疝修补术治疗食管裂孔疝的效果[J]. 临床医学, 2022, 42(1): 40-42.
[5]
田永刚, 曹贞子, 白飞虎, 等. 胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝患者的临床特点分析[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2020, 26(2): 1-5.
[6]
潘泓多, 孟宪梅, 年媛媛, 等. 胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝患者的临床特点分析[J]. 智慧健康, 2021, 7(16): 76-78.
[7]
董圣杰, 霍新合, 张泽峰, 等. 腹腔镜与开腹食管裂孔疝修补术的比较[J]. 现代仪器与医疗, 2017, 23(4): 39-40, 43.
[8]
Dallemagne B, Quero G, Lapergola A, et al. Treatment of giant paraesophageal hernia: pro laparoscopic approach[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(6): 909-919.
[9]
苏福增, 张成, 克力木, 等. 腹腔镜Nissen、Toupet和Dor胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的疗效对比分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2016, 19(9): 1014-1020.
[10]
牛磊, 刘宗志, 于磊, 等. 腹腔镜疝修补联合Nissen与Dor胃底折叠术治疗老年食管裂孔疝的对照研究[J]. 现代医学, 2018, 46(2): 168-172.
[11]
杨帅帅, 孙作成. 3D腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝53例临床分析[J]. 安徽医药, 2018, 22(5): 916-918.
[12]
张国瑜. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合不同胃底折叠术对食管裂孔疝患者术后的影响[J]. 中国实用医药, 2015, 10(27): 73-74.
[13]
Draaisma WA, Gooszen HG, Consten EC, et al. Mid-term results of robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia: a symptomatic and radiological prospective cohort study[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2008, 17: 165-170.
[14]
张振松, 贺跃, 张学军, 等. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术54例临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2017, 4(2): 52-55.
[15]
彭延春, 刘祥尧, 赵司卫. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合不同抗反流术式治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的临床比较[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2019, 25(4): 11-18.
[1] 张启龙, 柳亿, 卢会丽, 罗慧, 李成林, 王菁, 王辉. 奥妥珠单抗治疗磷脂酶A2受体相关膜性肾病的疗效与安全性:单中心回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 379-384.
[2] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[3] 聂生军, 王钰, 王毅, 鲜小庆, 马生成. 复方倍他米松局部注射联合光动力疗法治疗小型瘢痕疙瘩的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 404-410.
[4] 李海云, 赵敏娴, 申英末, 杨慧琪. 胃底折叠术预防食管裂孔疝术后并发症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 485-490.
[5] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[6] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[7] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[8] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[9] 王小琴, 汪丽, 崔建英. 无张力疝修补术治疗慢性肾功能衰竭合并腹股沟疝患者的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 538-542.
[10] 梁艳娉, 列诗韵, 王艺穗, 吴晓瑛, 林颖. 基于内镜操作细节记录系统构建胃底静脉曲张内镜下组织胶注射术的标准化管理方案[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 705-709.
[11] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[12] 史彬, 司远. 益气和络方联合缬沙坦治疗气阴两虚兼血瘀证IgA 肾病的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 306-312.
[13] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[14] 阳跃, 庹晓晔, 崔子豪, 欧阳四民, 林海阳, 胡景宇, 胡银, 李涛, 赵景峰, 郝岱峰, 冯光. 改良“阅读者”皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的疗效[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 751-755.
[15] 克地尔牙·马合木提, 胡波, 杨琼, 闫素, 胡岚卿, 高沛沛, 姚恩生. 依达拉奉右莰醇对急性脑梗死后认知功能障碍的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 459-466.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?