切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 26 -31. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.01.006

临床论著

腹腔镜抗反流手术对胃食管反流病主观症状的影响因素分析
王强1, 崔海龙2, 盛泽涛2, 欧阳大卫2, 王斌1, 单成祥1, 仇明1,(), 张伟1,()   
  1. 1. 200003 上海长征医院甲乳疝外科
    2. 233000 安徽省,蚌埠市第二人民医院外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-03 出版日期:2022-02-18
  • 通信作者: 仇明, 张伟

Analysis of the influencing factors of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery on subjective symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Qiang Wang1, Hailong Cui2, Zetao Sheng2, Dawei Ouyang2, Bin Wang1, Chengxiang Shan1, Ming Qiu1,(), Wei Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Nail and Breast Hernia Surgery, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai 200003, China
    2. Department of Surgery, Bengbu Second People&apos's Hospital, Bengbu 233000, Anhui Province, China
  • Received:2021-03-03 Published:2022-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Ming Qiu, Wei Zhang
引用本文:

王强, 崔海龙, 盛泽涛, 欧阳大卫, 王斌, 单成祥, 仇明, 张伟. 腹腔镜抗反流手术对胃食管反流病主观症状的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 26-31.

Qiang Wang, Hailong Cui, Zetao Sheng, Dawei Ouyang, Bin Wang, Chengxiang Shan, Ming Qiu, Wei Zhang. Analysis of the influencing factors of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery on subjective symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(01): 26-31.

目的

分析腹腔镜胃底折叠术和食管裂孔疝修补术治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)主观症状改善的因素分析。

方法

回顾分析2011年1月至2019年12月于上海长征医院甲乳疝外科接受腹腔镜下抗反流手术92例患者的临床资料。胃底折叠术包括Nissen患者54例和Toupet患者38例。随访108个月,所有患者均通过电话随访,内容包括反流症状(反酸、胃灼热)的改善,术后并发症、满意度等。并以反流和胃灼热症状的复发作为评判抗反流术后疗效的标准。通过χ2检验单因素分析和Logistic回归多因素分析,分析了性别、年龄(60岁为界)、质子泵抑制剂(PPI)使用时间(30和60个月为界)、PPI反应性(良好/不佳)、裂孔疝复发、手术方式(Nissen/Toupet)以及是否应用补片等因素对于GERD相关症状的影响。

结果

所有手术均顺利完成,末次随访时共有11例出现反流复发和21例胃灼热复发,其中12例患者自觉食管炎症状(反流、胃灼热)无缓解,手术总满意率为81.52%。末次随访时共有16例存在不同程度的吞咽困难,Niseen组10例,Toupet组6例。反流复发的单因素分析结果表明性别、年龄、手术方式、术前PPI使用时间以及PPI反应性与反流复发无相关性(P>0.05),裂孔疝复发和是否应用补片是术后反流复发的影响因素(P<0.05),多因素分析提示裂孔疝复发是术后反流复发的独立影响因素。胃灼热复发的单因素分析结果表明性别、年龄、手术方式、术前PPI使用时间以及应用补片与胃灼热复发无相关性(P>0.05),但PPI反应性和裂孔疝复发是术后胃灼热复发的影响因素(P<0.05),多因素分析表明PPI反应性是术后胃灼热复发的独立影响因素。

结论

腹腔镜抗反流手术(胃底折叠术和食管裂孔疝修补术)治疗GERD是安全有效的,对于术前PPI反应性较差的患者,手术指征应更加慎重。

Objective

We analyze the factors of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery to improve the subjective symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods

The clinical data of 92 patients who underwent laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in the Department of Thyroid Breast Hernia Surgery of Shanghai Changzheng Hospital from January 2011 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Fundoplication included 54 cases of Nissen and 38 cases of Toupet. All patients were followed up by telephone for 108 months, including the improvement of reflux symptoms (acid reflux, heartburn), postoperative complications, satisfaction, etc. The recurrence of reflux and heartburn symptoms was used to evaluate the efficacy of anti-reflux surgery. χ2 test, univariate analysis and logistic regression multivariate analysis were used to analyze the effects of gender, age (60 years old as the cut off value), PPI use time (30 months and 60 months as the cut off value), PPI reactivity (good/poor), hiatal hernia recurrence, operation method (Nissen/Toupet) and whether or not mesh was used on GERD related symptoms.

Results

All operations were successfully completed. At the last follow-up, 11 cases had reflux recurrence and 21 cases had heartburn recurrence. Among them, 12 patients felt that the symptoms of esophagitis (reflux and heartburn) were not relieved. The overall satisfaction rate of operation was 81.52%. At the last follow-up, 16 cases had dysphagia of varying degrees, including 10 cases in Niseen group and 6 cases in Toupet group. The results of univariate analysis of reflux recurrence showed that gender, age, operation method, preoperative PPI use time and PPI reactivity has no correlation with reflux recurrence (P>0.05). The recurrence of hiatal hernia and the application of mesh were the influencing factors of postoperative reflux recurrence (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that recurrence of hiatal hernia was independent influencing factor of postoperative reflux recurrence. Univariate analysis of heartburn recurrence showed that gender, age, operation method, preoperative PPI use time and mesh application has no correlation with heartburn recurrence (P>0.05), but PPI reactivity and hiatal hernia recurrence were the influencing factors of postoperative heartburn recurrence (P<0.05). Further multivariate analysis showed that PPI reactivity was the independent influencing factor of postoperative heartburn recurrence.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (fundoplication and hiatal hernia repair) is safe and effective in the treatment of GERD. For patients with poor preoperative PPI reactivity, the surgical indications should be more cautious.

表1 92例抗反流手术患者的一般资料、术后恢复情况及手术满意度
表2 92例患者抗反流术后反流复发的单因素分析
表3 92例患者抗反流术后反流复发的多因素分析
表4 92例患者抗反流术后胃灼热复发的单因素分析
表5 92例患者抗反流术后胃灼热复发的多因素分析
表6 92例患者抗反流术末次随访时吞咽困难的单因素分析(例)
[1]
克力木·阿不都热依木,麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明. 我国胃食管反流病抗反流外科的回顾与展望[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2021, 20(6): 639-642.
[2]
屈坤鹏,成晓舟. 我国部分地区胃食管反流病患病率的meta分析[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2015, 2(1): 34-44.
[3]
中国吞咽障碍康复评估与治疗专家共识组. 中国吞咽障碍评估与治疗专家共识(2017年版)第二部分[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018, 40(1): 1-10.
[4]
陶进勇,龚燕,赵运志, 等. 管扩张术治疗食管癌术后吻合口狭窄的疗效观察[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2015, 20(6): 652-654.
[5]
黄瑞娟,马向鹰,杜伟栋, 等. 兰索拉唑联合伊托必利辅助腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术对胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝患者抗反流效果及生活质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(3): 272-275.
[6]
Frantzides C, Carlson M, Loizides S, et al. Hiatal hernia repair with mesh: a survey of SAGES members[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(5): 1017-1024.
[7]
王强,王一凡,杜植鹏, 等. 胃食管反流病处置流程的亚太共识中关于难治性[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2016, 3(3): 22-34.
[8]
Fock KM, Talley N, Goh KL, et al. Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an update focusing on refractory reflux disease and Barrett's oesophagus[J]. Gut, 2016, 65(9): 1402-1415.
[9]
周金池,窦维佳,魏延, 等. 中国胃食管反流病患者焦虑抑郁患病率的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(5): 608-613.
[10]
Johnson MK, Venkatesh M, Liu N, et al. pH impedance parameters associated with improvement in GERD health-related quality of life following anti-reflux surgery[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2021, 25(1): 28-35.
[11]
Du X, Hu Z, Yan C, et al. A meta-analysis of long follow-up outcomes of laparoscopic Nissen (total) versus Toupet (270 degrees ) fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease based on randomized controlled trials in adults[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2016, 16(1): 88.
[12]
张伟,仇明. 腹腔镜抗反流手术的争议问题[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2011, 4(4): 301-303.
[13]
黄涛,刘春庆,赵磊, 等. Nissen胃底折叠术和Toupet胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病合并重度食管炎的疗效对比[J]. 中国临床医师杂志, 2021, 49(3): 318-320.
[1] 白浪, 张雪玉, 白铁成, 贺爱军. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中圆锥形重叠吻合成形术对Siewert Ⅱ型AEG患者胃食管反流、营养状态的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 679-682.
[2] 邢益民, 张天飞, 戴慧勇. 胃肠充盈超声造影检查在反酸、嗳气患者临床诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 303-306.
[3] 李海云, 赵敏娴, 申英末, 杨慧琪. 胃底折叠术预防食管裂孔疝术后并发症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 485-490.
[4] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[5] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[6] 杜晨阳, 王勇, 段鑫, 柯文杰, 石念, 武英翔, 罗文. 腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术后吞咽困难的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 523-527.
[7] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 邓昌荣, 战秀岚, 纪涛, 王峰, 田书瑞, 陈冬, 张玉, 刘健男, 宋庆. 抗反流黏膜套扎治疗顽固性胃食管反流病[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 227-233.
[8] 唐小久, 胡曼, 许必君, 肖亚. 肥胖合并胃食管反流病患者严重程度与其焦虑抑郁及营养状态的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 360-364.
[9] 吴欣, 袁晓晨, 沈慧, 秦建华. 三尖瓣反流速度评估肺动脉高压患者心脏结构改变的研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 259-267.
[10] 王立辉, 杜海涛, 万军, 陈倩倩. 动态反流监测在食管-咽喉反流性疾病诊断中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 268-272.
[11] 张静, 白亦冰, 来要良, 刘永, 和媛媛, 苏敏. 不同体位对胃食管反流病患者食管高分辨率测压的影响[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 115-120.
[12] 张靖, 柏君, 陈玉盟, 张鹏, 侯芳芳, 王军芳, 孙静, 赵士博, 杨喆, 张玥, 张瑞芳, 朱宏斌. 抗反流黏膜消融术治疗胃食管反流病患者的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 121-125.
[13] 华丽, 仲卫冬, 胡根, 张丽英, 邵国益. 手术治疗胃食管反流病对患者生活质量和心理状态影响的研究[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 126-129.
[14] 文明, 张丽, 谢芳, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 构建胃食管反流病患者发生心房颤动的临床预测模型[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 130-136.
[15] 高训锋, 许晓露, 张金辉, 蔡理全, 张恒, 邰沁文. 胃食管反流病与肝胆胰系统疾病的因果关系:一项孟德尔随机化研究[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 143-152.
阅读次数
全文


摘要