切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 557 -560. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.06.019

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中缝合关闭疝缺损对预防术后血清肿的效果
张祥志1, 焦传东1, 张子宏1, 朱熠林2,()   
  1. 1. 054800 河北,清河县中心医院普外科
    2. 100043 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-02 出版日期:2019-12-18
  • 通信作者: 朱熠林

Effect of hernia defect closure in laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair on the prevention of postoperative seroma

Xiangzhi Zhang1, Chuandong Jiao1, Zihong Zhang1, Yilin Zhu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Qinghe County Central Hospital, Hebei, Qinghe 054800, Chinia
    2. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China
  • Received:2019-04-02 Published:2019-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Yilin Zhu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhu Yilin, Email:
引用本文:

张祥志, 焦传东, 张子宏, 朱熠林. 腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中缝合关闭疝缺损对预防术后血清肿的效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 557-560.

Xiangzhi Zhang, Chuandong Jiao, Zihong Zhang, Yilin Zhu. Effect of hernia defect closure in laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair on the prevention of postoperative seroma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(06): 557-560.

目的

探讨腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中缝合关闭疝缺损对预防术后血清肿的效果。

方法

采用前瞻性随机对照研究方式,将2017年1月至2018年12月,清河县中心医院收治的200例腹股沟直疝患者随机分为试验组和对照组,2组患者均接受腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术,试验组患者在术中使用0号涤纶缝线缝合关闭疝环和直疝疝囊腔;对照组患者不处理疝环,2组患者术后7 d、1个月和3个月分别复查腹股沟区彩色多普勒超声,对比腹股沟区血清肿的发生情况并评估血清肿的积液量,同时比较2组患者手术时间、住院时间、术后慢性疼痛和复发情况等。

结果

术后7 d、1个月复查局部彩色多普勒超声,对照组血清肿积液量分别为(30.63±6.86)ml、(20.19±5.94)ml明显高于试验组(15.45±4.16)ml、(11.00±2.23)ml,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组术后3个月血清肿积液量(13.18±5.13)ml与实验组(10.00±0.00)比较ml,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组手术时间(53.21±8.21)min高于对照组(47.60±5.34)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组住院时间(3.09±0.55)d与对照组(3.08±0.63)d基本相同,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者术后随访期间均未出现慢性疼痛及复发。

结论

腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中缝合关闭缺损这一操作安全有效,可显著减少术后血清肿发生率,且不增加术后感染、疼痛及复发等风险。

Objective

To investigate the effect of hernia defect suture closure in laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair on prevention of postoperative seroma.

Methods

A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on 200 cases of inguinal hernia in Qinghe County Central Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018. The patients were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group. Both groups underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP). In the experimental group, hernia ring and sac closure with polyester sutures was performed. The patients in the two groups were reexamined with color Doppler ultrasound in the groin area 7 days, 1 month and 3 months after the operation, to compare the occurrence of seroma in the groin area and to evaluate the serum fluid volume. The operation time, hospitalization time, postoperative chronic pain and recurrence in the two groups were compared.

Results

At 7 d and 1 month after the operation, the color Doppler ultrasound showed that the serum fluid volume in the control group [(30.63±6.86) ml and (20.19±5.94) ml] was significantly higher than those in the experimental group [(15.45±4.16) ml and (11.00±2.23) ml], the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). At 3 months after the operation, there was no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group in the serum fluid volume [(13.18±5.13) ml vs (10.00±0.00) ml, P>0.05]. The operation time of the experimental group was (53.21±8.21) minutes longer than that of the control group (47.60±5.34) minutes, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the hospitalization time of the experimental group was (3.09±0.55) days was comparable with that of the control group (3.08±0.63) days, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05); there was no chronic pain and recurrence in the follow-up period of the two groups.

Conclusion

Defect closure in the laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair operation is safe and effective, and it can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative seroma, without increasing the risk of postoperative infection, pain and recurrence.

表1 2组腹股沟直疝患者一般资料比较
表2 2组腹股沟直疝患者手术及随访结果
[1]
Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E, et al. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic(TAPP) and endoscopic(TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia(International Endohernia Society)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(2): 289-321.
[2]
Berney CR. The endoloop technique for the primary closure of direct inguinal hernia defect during the endoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(3): 301-305.
[3]
Reddy VM, Sutton CD, Bloxham L, et al. Laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: a new technique that reduces the development of postoperative seroma[J]. Hernia, 2007, 11(5): 393-396.
[4]
Lau H, Lee F. Seroma following endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty[J]. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17(11): 1773-1777.
[5]
Ismail M, Garg M, Rajagopal M, et al. Impact of closed suction drain in preperitoneal space on the incidence of seroma formation after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2009, 19(3): 263-266.
[6]
Fan JKM, Liu J, Chen K, et al. Preperitoneal closed AQ12 -system suction drainage after totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty in the prevention of early seroma formation: a prospective doubleblind randomised controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(3): 455-465.
[7]
Sürgit Ö, Çavuşoğlu NT, Kılıç MÖ, et al. Use of fibrin glue in preventing pseudorecurrence after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of large indirect inguinal hernia[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res, 2016, 91(3): 127-132.
[8]
Li J, Zhang W. Closure of a direct inguinal hernia defect in laparoscopic repair with barbed suture: a simple method to prevent seroma formation?[J]. Surg Endosc. 2018,32(2): 1082-1086.
[9]
Köckerling F, Bittner R, Adolf D, et al. Seroma following transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty(TAPP): incidence, risk factors, and preventive measures[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(2): 2222-2231.
[10]
付焱,李恒. 腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中假性疝囊处理的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 58-61.
[11]
王广伟,毛忠琦. 应用经腹直肌悬吊技术预防腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术后血清肿[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3): 229-231.
[12]
Cihan A, Ozdemir H, Uçan BH, et al. Fade or fate. Seroma in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(2): 325-328.
[13]
Li J, Zhang W. Comment to: "Factors associated with hernia recurrence after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: a 2-year prospective cohort study. " By Schjøth-Iversen L[J]. Hernia, 2017, 21(6): 985-986.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要