切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 452 -455. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.05.017

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

经同侧腹直肌易位造口在腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术中的应用
朱林榆1, 张瑜1, 冷少龙1,()   
  1. 1. 518000 深圳,中山大学附属第七医院
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-07 出版日期:2019-10-18
  • 通信作者: 冷少龙

Experience in application of ipsilateral rectus abdominis translocation stoma in laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair

Linyu Zhu1, Yu Zhang1, Shaolong Leng1,()   

  1. 1. The seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518000, China
  • Received:2019-03-07 Published:2019-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Shaolong Leng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Leng Shaolong, Email:
引用本文:

朱林榆, 张瑜, 冷少龙. 经同侧腹直肌易位造口在腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 452-455.

Linyu Zhu, Yu Zhang, Shaolong Leng. Experience in application of ipsilateral rectus abdominis translocation stoma in laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 452-455.

目的

分析经同侧腹直肌易位造口在腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术中的应用价值。

方法

选取2016年8月至2017年12月,重庆市开州区中医院收治的60例乙状结肠造口旁疝患者,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组30例。对照组行开放造口旁疝修补术,观察组行腹腔镜经同侧腹直肌易位造口修补术。比较2组患者手术和住院情况、并发症发生率、复发率、远期疼痛发生率及切口疝发生率。

结果

观察组患者感染发生率、并发症总发生率及复发率分别为0、16.67%及3.33%,明显低于对照组16.67%、43.33%及23.33%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.455、5.079、5.192,P=0.020、0.024、0.023)。观察组患者手术时间、住院费用分别为(131.05±12.11)min、(38 946.06±1 019.75)元均高于对照组(96.91±10.54)min、(18 492.19±572.36)元,差异有统计学意义(t=11.647、95.802,P均<0.001)。观察组患者术中出血量、术后下床活动时间及术后恢复活动时间分别为(33.14±8.06)ml、(1.26±0.51)d、(3.59±1.17)d均低于对照组(69.28±9.18)ml、(2.27±1.02)d、(5.44±2.25)d,差异有统计学意义(t=16.204、4.851、3.996,P均<0.001)。

结论

经同侧腹直肌易位造口在腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术中应用效果较好,能够有效改善乙状结肠造口旁疝患者手术情况及住院情况,减少术后并发症的发生和疝复发。

Objective

To analyze the application value of ipsilateral rectus abdominis translocation stoma in laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair.

Methods

60 patients with parasagiostomy hernia admitted to Kaizhou district hospital were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, with 30 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were treated with open parastomal hernia repair, while patients in the observation group were treated with laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair with stoma relocation trans-ispilateral rectus abdominis. The operation, hospitalization, complication rate, recurrence rate, long-term pain rate and incisional hernia rate were compared between the two groups.

Results

The incidence of infection, total incidence of complications and recurrence rate in the observation group were 0%, 16.67% and 3.33%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group (16.67%, 43.33% and 23.33%), with statistical differences (χ2=5.455、5.079、5.192, P=0.020、0.024、0.023). The operation time and hospitalization expenses of patients in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, with statistical differences [(131.05±12.11) min vs (96.91±10.54) min, (38 946.06±1 019.75) yuan vs (18 492.19±572.36) yuan, t=11.647、95.802, all P<0.001]. The patients in the observation group had lower intraoperative bleeding, postoperative ambulation time and postoperative recovery time than those in the control group, with statistical differences [(33.14±8.06) ml vs (69.28±9.18) ml, (1.26±0.51) d vs (2.27±1.02) d, (3.59±1.17) d vs (5.44±2.25) d, t=16.204、4.851、3.996, all P<0.001].

Conclusion

Ipsilateral rectus abdominis translocation stoma has good effect in laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. It can effectively improve the operation and hospitalization, and reduce the postoperative complications and recurrence in patients with parastomal hernia of sigmoid colon, which is worthy for clinical application.

表1 2组患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表2 2组患者住院指标比较(±s
表3 2组间并发症比较[例(%)]
表4 2组复发、慢性疼痛、切口疝情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
Mericli AF, Garvey PB, Giordano S, et al. Abdominal wall reconstruction with concomitant ostomy-associated hernia repair: outcomes and propensity score analysis[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2017, 224(3): 351-361.
[2]
Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 183-198.
[3]
郭自成, 杨福全. 腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术的术式选择与并发症处理[J]. 腹部外科, 2017, 30(3): 159-163.
[4]
姜成文, 李斌辉, 潘利. 腹腔镜乙状结肠造口旁疝修补术7例[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志, 2014, 20(3): 316-317.
[5]
卢志坤, 吴永强, 何德谋. 直肠癌Miles手术行经腹直肌乙状结肠造口对减少术后结肠造口旁疝发生率的作用[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(2): 125-127.
[6]
Majumder A, Orenstein SB, Miller HJ, et al. Stapled Transabdominal ostomy reinforcement with retromuscular mesh(STORRM): Technical details and early outcomes of a novel approach for retromuscular repair of parastomal hernias[J]. Am J Surg, 2018, 215(1): 82-87.
[7]
耿兴隆, 秦伟, 戴勇. 切口疝腹腔镜与开放修补术的疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2014, 35(4): 632-640.
[8]
刘文. 腹腔镜与开放手术用于乙状结肠造口旁疝修补的临床比较[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2016, 22(4): 388-391.
[9]
何凯, 姚琪远. 腹腔镜修补造口旁疝术式选择和技术要点[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(11): 1161-1165.
[10]
姚远. 腹腔镜造口旁疝补片修补术的临床体会[J]. 中国实用医药, 2015, 10(32): 27-28.
[11]
Yang X, He K, Hua R, et al. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2017, 5(3): 45.
[12]
李伟东, 王东, 纪艳超, 等. 经同侧腹直肌易位造口腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术17例疗效分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1269-1271, 1275.
[13]
朱乐乐, 王飞通, 刘星, 等. 造口旁疝的诊治现状及展望[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 10-13.
[14]
郭自成, 杨福全. 腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术的术式选择与并发症处理[J]. 腹部外科, 2017, 30(3): 159-163.
[15]
吴建波, 钱峻, 杨豪俊, 等. 腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术后复发伴肠梗阻1例报告[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(2): 207-208.
[16]
Köhler G, Fischer I, Wundsam H. A Novel Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair Combining a Laparoscopic and Ostomy-Opening Approach[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2018, 28(2): 209-214.
[17]
Huang DY, Pan L, Chen QL, et al. Modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair of parastomal hernia with a three-point anchoring technique[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2018, 6(14): 759-766.
[1] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[2] 涂家金, 廖武强, 刘金晶, 涂志鹏, 毛远桂. 严重烧伤患者鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 491-497.
[3] 廖锵云, 王震, 林洁玉, 廖夏, 邓锦华, 李杰峰, 邓建维, 李明, 荣新洲. 虎门地区创伤弧菌感染的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 394-398.
[4] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[5] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[6] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[7] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[8] 赵立力, 王魁向, 张小冲, 李志远. 血沉与C-反应蛋白比值在假体周围感染中的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 351-355.
[9] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[10] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[11] 李静静, 翟蕾, 赵海平, 郑波. 多囊肾合并囊肿的多重耐药菌感染一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 920-923.
[12] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[13] 卓徐鹏, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 感染性疾病与老年人低蛋白血症的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 896-899.
[14] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[15] 杨艳丽, 陈昱, 赵若辰, 杜伟, 马海娟, 许珂, 张莉芸. 系统性红斑狼疮合并血流感染的危险因素及细菌学分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 694-699.
阅读次数
全文


摘要