切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 58 -61. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.01.016

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中假性疝囊处理的临床研究
付焱1, 李恒1,()   
  1. 1. 442000 湖北省十堰市太和医院(湖北医药学院附属医院)普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-02 出版日期:2019-02-18
  • 通信作者: 李恒
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省十堰市科技局指导项目(16Y09)

Clinical study on treatment of false hernia sac during laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair

Yan Fu1, Heng Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgical, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, 32 South Renmin Road, Shiyan 442000, P.R. China
  • Received:2018-04-02 Published:2019-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Heng Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Heng, Email:
引用本文:

付焱, 李恒. 腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中假性疝囊处理的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 58-61.

Yan Fu, Heng Li. Clinical study on treatment of false hernia sac during laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 58-61.

目的

探讨腹股沟直疝经全腹膜外修补术中个体化手术方式固定假性疝囊的临床疗效。

方法

选择2014年1月至2016年1月,湖北医药学院附属太和医院收治106例腹股沟直疝患者的临床资料,由随机数字表法随机分成固定组(53例)与常规组(53例)。术后随访2年,分别观察2组手术时间、术后第1和3天疼痛评分、术后住院时间、住院费用及术后并发症(血清肿、局部异物感、阴囊肿胀、伤口感染、腹股沟区慢性疼痛)发生率、术后2年疝复发率。

结果

2组患者的手术时间、术后第1和3天疼痛评分和住院时间及住院费用比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。固定组血清肿及局部异物牵拉感的发生率较常规组显著减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而在阴囊肿胀、伤口感染、术后腹股沟区慢性疼痛并发症发生率方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访2年,2组均无疝复发。

结论

腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中采用固定直疝假性疝囊可有效减少术后血清肿及术区异物牵拉感,是一种安全、经济、有效的固定方法。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical effects of individuated surgical procedures for managing false hernia sac following laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

From January 2014 to January 2016, 106 patients with a clinical diagnosis of direct inguinal hernia were enrolled. According to the random number table, the patients divided into the fixed treatment group (53 cases) and the routine treatment group (53 cases) randomly. Operation time, postoperative pain score on the 1st and 3th day, postoperative hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, postoperative complications (seroma, discomfort and foreign body feeling, swelling of scrotum, wound infection, chronic groin pain) and hernia recurrence rate within 2 years were observed.

Results

The fixed treatment group compared with the routine treatment group, the operative time, postoperative pain score on the 1st and 3rd day, postoperative hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, postoperative complications (swelling of scrotum, wound infection, chronic groin pain) had no significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative seroma and discomfort and foreign body feeling in the fixed treatment group was significantly lower than in the routine treatment group (P<0.05). No hernia recurrence was found in all two groups.

Conclusions

The primary repair of direct inguinal hernia defects with individuated surgical procedures during laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair is safe, economical and efficient for prevention of postoperative seroma, and discomfort/foreign body feeling, which could be applied in the clinic.

表1 2组患者手术观察统计情况比较(±s
表2 2组患者术后并发症发生情况比较
[4]
陆朝阳, 王嘉倍, 王继洲. 应用负压引流预防嵌顿疝腹膜前间隙修补术后血清肿形成的研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(5): 351-354.
[5]
唐健雄, 郑民华, 陈杰, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术操作指南(2017版)[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 401-406.
[6]
Tolver MA, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. Convalescence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a qualitative systematic review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(12): 5165-5172.
[7]
Scheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, et al. Transabdominal Preperitoneal(TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair-A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. BMC Surg, 2017, 17(1): 55.
[8]
王广伟, 毛忠琦. 应用经腹直肌悬吊技术预防腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术后血清肿[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3): 229-231.
[9]
Mahmoudvand H, Forutani S, Nadri S. Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Surgical Repair in Inguinal Hernia with Classic versus Preperitoneal Methods on Reduction of Postoperative Complications [J]. Bio Med Res Inter, 2017, 2017(1): 3785302.
[10]
Klink CD, Binnebosel M, Lucas AH, et al. Do drainage liquid characteristics serve as predictors for seroma formation after incisional hernia repair?[J]. Hernia, 2010, 14(2): 175-179.
[11]
Köckerling F, Bittner R, Adolf D, et al. Seroma following transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty(TAPP): incidence, risk factors, and preventive measures[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(5): 2222-2231.
[12]
Shah NS, Fullwood C, Siriwardena AK, et al. Mesh fixation at laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis comparing tissue glue and tack fixation[J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38(10): 2558-2570.
[13]
Fan JKM, Liu J, Chen K, et al. Preperitoneal closed-system suction drainage after totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty in the prevention of early seroma formation: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(3): 455-465.
[14]
Li J, Zhang W. Closure of a direct inguinal hernia defect in laparoscopic repair with barbed suture: a simple method to prevent seroma formation?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(2): 1082-1086.
[15]
Aravind B, Cook A. Intra-abdominal giant infected seroma following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(5): 795-797.
[1]
李健文, 王明刚, 唐健雄, 等. 腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化操作指南[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(5): 505-512.
[2]
Reddy VM, Sutton CD, Bloxham L, et al. Laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: a new technique that reduces the development of postoperative seroma[J]. Hernia, 2007, 11(5): 393-396.
[3]
Berney CR. The Endoloop technique for the primary closure of direct inguinal hernia defect during the endoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(3): 301-305.
[16]
屈坤鹏, 司若湟, 杨晓军, 等. 医用胶和钉合固定直疝假性疝囊预防直疝术后血清肿的比较[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2015, 22(4): 443-446.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[4] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[6] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10] 李三祥, 李佳, 刘俊峰, 吕东晨, 方晖东, 谭朝晖, 刘杰, 潘佐, 乔建坤. 基于CT影像的三维重建成像技术在腹腔镜大肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 570-574.
[11] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[12] 汪帮琦, 陈波特, 林浩坚, 许晖阳, 王镇伟, 袁雪峰, 林康健, 邱晓拂. 经腹入路3D腹腔镜联合输尿管硬镜同期处理肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻并肾盏结石的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 597-600.
[13] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[14] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
[15] 张继新, 胡军红, 谢爽, 武祖印, 张春旭. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术可行性及近期疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 460-465.
阅读次数
全文


摘要