切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 58 -61. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.01.016

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中假性疝囊处理的临床研究
付焱1, 李恒1,()   
  1. 1. 442000 湖北省十堰市太和医院(湖北医药学院附属医院)普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-02 出版日期:2019-02-18
  • 通信作者: 李恒
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省十堰市科技局指导项目(16Y09)

Clinical study on treatment of false hernia sac during laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair

Yan Fu1, Heng Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgical, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, 32 South Renmin Road, Shiyan 442000, P.R. China
  • Received:2018-04-02 Published:2019-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Heng Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Heng, Email:
引用本文:

付焱, 李恒. 腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中假性疝囊处理的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 58-61.

Yan Fu, Heng Li. Clinical study on treatment of false hernia sac during laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 58-61.

目的

探讨腹股沟直疝经全腹膜外修补术中个体化手术方式固定假性疝囊的临床疗效。

方法

选择2014年1月至2016年1月,湖北医药学院附属太和医院收治106例腹股沟直疝患者的临床资料,由随机数字表法随机分成固定组(53例)与常规组(53例)。术后随访2年,分别观察2组手术时间、术后第1和3天疼痛评分、术后住院时间、住院费用及术后并发症(血清肿、局部异物感、阴囊肿胀、伤口感染、腹股沟区慢性疼痛)发生率、术后2年疝复发率。

结果

2组患者的手术时间、术后第1和3天疼痛评分和住院时间及住院费用比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。固定组血清肿及局部异物牵拉感的发生率较常规组显著减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而在阴囊肿胀、伤口感染、术后腹股沟区慢性疼痛并发症发生率方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访2年,2组均无疝复发。

结论

腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中采用固定直疝假性疝囊可有效减少术后血清肿及术区异物牵拉感,是一种安全、经济、有效的固定方法。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical effects of individuated surgical procedures for managing false hernia sac following laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

From January 2014 to January 2016, 106 patients with a clinical diagnosis of direct inguinal hernia were enrolled. According to the random number table, the patients divided into the fixed treatment group (53 cases) and the routine treatment group (53 cases) randomly. Operation time, postoperative pain score on the 1st and 3th day, postoperative hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, postoperative complications (seroma, discomfort and foreign body feeling, swelling of scrotum, wound infection, chronic groin pain) and hernia recurrence rate within 2 years were observed.

Results

The fixed treatment group compared with the routine treatment group, the operative time, postoperative pain score on the 1st and 3rd day, postoperative hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, postoperative complications (swelling of scrotum, wound infection, chronic groin pain) had no significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative seroma and discomfort and foreign body feeling in the fixed treatment group was significantly lower than in the routine treatment group (P<0.05). No hernia recurrence was found in all two groups.

Conclusions

The primary repair of direct inguinal hernia defects with individuated surgical procedures during laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair is safe, economical and efficient for prevention of postoperative seroma, and discomfort/foreign body feeling, which could be applied in the clinic.

表1 2组患者手术观察统计情况比较(±s
表2 2组患者术后并发症发生情况比较
[4]
陆朝阳, 王嘉倍, 王继洲. 应用负压引流预防嵌顿疝腹膜前间隙修补术后血清肿形成的研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(5): 351-354.
[5]
唐健雄, 郑民华, 陈杰, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术操作指南(2017版)[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 401-406.
[6]
Tolver MA, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. Convalescence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a qualitative systematic review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(12): 5165-5172.
[7]
Scheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, et al. Transabdominal Preperitoneal(TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair-A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. BMC Surg, 2017, 17(1): 55.
[8]
王广伟, 毛忠琦. 应用经腹直肌悬吊技术预防腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术后血清肿[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3): 229-231.
[9]
Mahmoudvand H, Forutani S, Nadri S. Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Surgical Repair in Inguinal Hernia with Classic versus Preperitoneal Methods on Reduction of Postoperative Complications [J]. Bio Med Res Inter, 2017, 2017(1): 3785302.
[10]
Klink CD, Binnebosel M, Lucas AH, et al. Do drainage liquid characteristics serve as predictors for seroma formation after incisional hernia repair?[J]. Hernia, 2010, 14(2): 175-179.
[11]
Köckerling F, Bittner R, Adolf D, et al. Seroma following transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty(TAPP): incidence, risk factors, and preventive measures[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(5): 2222-2231.
[12]
Shah NS, Fullwood C, Siriwardena AK, et al. Mesh fixation at laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis comparing tissue glue and tack fixation[J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38(10): 2558-2570.
[13]
Fan JKM, Liu J, Chen K, et al. Preperitoneal closed-system suction drainage after totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty in the prevention of early seroma formation: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(3): 455-465.
[14]
Li J, Zhang W. Closure of a direct inguinal hernia defect in laparoscopic repair with barbed suture: a simple method to prevent seroma formation?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(2): 1082-1086.
[15]
Aravind B, Cook A. Intra-abdominal giant infected seroma following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(5): 795-797.
[1]
李健文, 王明刚, 唐健雄, 等. 腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化操作指南[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(5): 505-512.
[2]
Reddy VM, Sutton CD, Bloxham L, et al. Laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: a new technique that reduces the development of postoperative seroma[J]. Hernia, 2007, 11(5): 393-396.
[3]
Berney CR. The Endoloop technique for the primary closure of direct inguinal hernia defect during the endoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(3): 301-305.
[16]
屈坤鹏, 司若湟, 杨晓军, 等. 医用胶和钉合固定直疝假性疝囊预防直疝术后血清肿的比较[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2015, 22(4): 443-446.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?