切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 579 -583. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.05.017

论著

超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果
周晓艳, 王志钢, 周冬喜()   
  1. 226600 江苏南通,海安市中医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-01 出版日期:2023-10-18
  • 通信作者: 周冬喜

Effect of ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal muscle plane block on in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery

Xiaoyan Zhou, Zhigang Wang, Dongxi Zhou()   

  1. Anesthesiology Department, Haian Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Haian, Jiangsu 226600, China
  • Received:2022-10-01 Published:2023-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Dongxi Zhou
引用本文:

周晓艳, 王志钢, 周冬喜. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 579-583.

Xiaoyan Zhou, Zhigang Wang, Dongxi Zhou. Effect of ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal muscle plane block on in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 579-583.

目的

探讨超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析2019年4月至2022年4月,海安市中医院86例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,均接受腹腔镜疝修补术治疗。依据麻醉方式的不同分为观察组和对照组,每组各43例。对照组行常规麻醉,观察组行超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞。比较2组患者围手术期相关指标[手术时间、拔管时间、恢复自主呼吸时间、苏醒时间、苏醒质量(Steward苏醒评分)、术后住院时间以及术后芬太尼用量],麻醉诱导前(T0)、麻醉诱导3 min后(T1)、手术结束时(T2)患者的心率、平均脉动压(MAP)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)水平,术后1、6、12 h疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、Ramsay镇静评分及不良反应发生情况。

结果

2组患者手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组拔管时间、恢复自主呼吸时间、苏醒时间、住院时间、术后芬太尼用量均少于对照组,Steward评分则高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者T0时心率、MAP,各时间段SpO2水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者T1、T2时心率、MAP水平均低于同组T0时,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者T2时心率均低于同组T1时,MAP水平则高于同组T1时,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组T1、T2时心率均低于对照组T1、T2时,MAP水平则高于对照组T1、T2时,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者术后6、12 h的VAS评分、Ramsay镇静评分均低于同组术后1 h,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者术后12 h的VAS评分、Ramsay镇静评分均低于同组术后6 h,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后1、6、12 h的VAS评分均低于对照组,Ramsay镇静评分则高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者不良反应发生情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞用于腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中,患者苏醒质量好,术后镇痛、镇静效果好,安全性较高。

Objective

To explore the application effect of ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal muscle plane block in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of clinical data of 86 patients with inguinal hernia at Haian Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, from April 2019 to April 2022, all of whom underwent laparoscopic hernia repair surgery. They were divided into observation group and control group according to different anesthesia methods, with 43 patients in each group. The control group received routine anesthesia, and the observation group received ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal muscle plane block. The perioperative indexes [operation time, extubation time, recovery time of spontaneous breathing, recovery time, recoveryquality (Steward recovery score), postoperative hospitalization time and postoperative fentanyl dosage] were compared between the two groups. The heart rate, mean pulsatile pressure (MAP) and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) before anesthesia induction (T0), 3 min after anesthesia induction (T1), and at the end of surgery (T2) were compared between the two groups. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Ramsay sedation score were compared between the two groups at 1, 6 and 12h after operation, and the adverse reactions of the two groups were compared.

Results

There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P>0.05); The extubation time, recovery time of spontaneous breathing, recovery time, hospitalization time and postoperative fentanyl dosage in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group, and the Steward score was higher than that in the control group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in heart rate, MAP and SpO2 levels at T0 (P>0.05); The levels of heart rate and MAP at T1 and T2 in the two groups were lower than those at T0 in the same group, with statistical significance (P<0.05); The heart rate level at T2 in both groups was lower than that at T1 in the same group, and the MAP level was higher than that at T1 in the same group, with statistical significance (P<0.05); The heart rate level of the observation group at T1 and T2 was lower than that of the control group at T1 and T2, and the MAP level was higher than that of the control group at T1 and T2, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The VAS score and Ramsay sedation score of the two groups at 6 and 12 h after operation were lower than those of the same group at 1 h after operation, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); The VAS score and Ramsay sedation score of the two groups at 12 h after operation were lower than those of the same group at 6 h after operation (P<0.05). The VAS scores of the observation group at 1, 6 and 12 h after operation were lower than those of the control group, while the Ramsay sedation score were higher than those of the control group, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal muscl plane block is used in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, which has good recovery quality, postoperative analgesia and sedation effect, and high safety for patients.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较[例(%)]
表2 2组患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表3 2组患者各时间段心率、MAP、SpO2水平比较(±s
表4 2组患者术后各时间段视觉模拟评分、Ramsay镇静评分比较(分,±s
表5 2组患者不良反应发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
陈思梦, 刘力嘉. 腹股沟疝术后感染及慢性疼痛临床处理[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(5): 398-400.
[2]
李金东, 王晨星, 胡延岩, 等. 青年腹股沟疝临床特点及腹腔镜手术治疗疗效分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2022, 42(1): 114-119.
[3]
张邓新, 王叶纯, 宗剑, 等. 超声引导下神经阻滞技术对腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的治疗作用[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2020, 37(7): 1306-1308.
[4]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(7): 495-498.
[5]
劳贤邦, 庞德春, 纪建波, 等. 两种苏醒评分方法对麻醉复苏效果影响的比较[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2016, 31(11): 1043-1045.
[6]
孙兵, 车晓明. 视觉模拟评分法(VAS)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2012, 28(6): 645-645.
[7]
高玉华, 王哲, 陈易, 等. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞用于胫骨骨折术后镇痛的效果[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2019, 39(2): 196-198.
[8]
Scheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, et al. Transabdominal Preperitoneal(TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair-A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Bmc Surgery, 2017, 17(1): 55.
[9]
王伟, 赵宇斌. TAPP与传统腹股沟疝无张力修补术对成人腹股沟疝手术应激及疼痛影响的对比研究[J]. 医学临床研究, 2021, 38(4): 504-507.
[10]
朱尤壮, 谭媚月, 陈丽娜, 等. 超声引导下区域神经阻滞在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用进展[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2020, 36(6): 608-611.
[11]
黄志, 夏维, 柯晋源, 等. 超声引导下髂腹股沟/髂腹下神经阻滞联合生殖股神经生殖支阻滞在老年腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2020, 36(2): 135-139.
[12]
许滔, 唐国强, 贺光宏, 等. 超声引导下连续髂腹下和髂腹股沟神经阻滞在高龄疝修补术后镇痛效果评价[J]. 中国煤炭工业医学杂志, 2021, 24(4): 361-365.
[13]
Kamel AAF, Amin OAI, Ibrahem MAM. Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Total Abdominal Hysterectomyr[J]. Pain Physician, 2020, 23(4): 375-382.
[14]
Altıparmak B, Korkmaz Toker M, Uysal AI, et al. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia of adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Randomized, controlled trial[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2019, 57: 31-36.
[15]
纪健, 李亚春, 鲁应军, 等. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中应用效果及安全性分析[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2019, 37(10): 8-9.
[16]
肖甄男, 商丽华, 龙波. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞复合右美托咪定在老年患者腹股沟疝修补术术中及术后的镇痛效果[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2018, 47(6): 507-512.
[17]
肖琼瑶, 王世禄, 李媛, 等. 超声引导下QLB复合气管插管全麻对于老年患者TEP腹股沟疝无张力修补术影响因素分析[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2021, 21(13): 2578-2582.
[18]
曹建方, 方芳, 王文娟, 等. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞用于腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛所需罗哌卡因半数有效剂量的临床研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2018, 47(36): 4649-4651.
[19]
周安能, 王春光, 刘黔, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞复合静脉麻醉在老年患者腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 山东医药, 2019, 59(4): 71-74.
[20]
张林. 超声引导下髂腹股沟神经髂腹下神经阻滞麻醉对腹股沟斜疝疝囊高位结扎修补术患者的影响[J].中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(22): 3900-3902.
[1] 张婉微, 秦芸芸, 蔡绮哲, 林明明, 田润雨, 金姗, 吕秀章. 心肌收缩早期延长对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉严重狭窄的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1016-1022.
[2] 任书堂, 刘晓程, 张亚东, 孙佳英, 陈萍, 周建华, 龙进, 黄云洲. 左心室辅助装置支持下单纯收缩期主动脉瓣反流的超声心动图特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1023-1028.
[3] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[4] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[5] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[8] 冯冰, 邹秋果, 梁振波, 卢艳明, 曾奕, 吴淑苗. 老年非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌超声征象与分子生物学指标的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 48-51.
[9] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[10] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[11] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[12] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[13] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[14] 赵文毅, 邹冰子, 蔡冠晖, 刘永志, 温红. 超声应变力弹性成像联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺在前列腺病变诊断中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 988-994.
[15] 薛念余, 张盛敏, 吴凌恒, 沙蕾, 童揽月, 沈崔琴, 李朝军, 杜联芳. 研究血清胆红素对2型糖尿病患者心脏结构发生改变前心肌功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1004-1009.
阅读次数
全文


摘要