切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 561 -565. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.05.013

论著

腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年子宫脱垂效果
赵宏霞, 刘静, 李晓薇, 陈金婵, 汪志霞()   
  1. 210046 南京,泰康仙林鼓楼医院妇科
    210000 南京医科大学附属明基医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-23 出版日期:2023-10-18
  • 通信作者: 汪志霞
  • 基金资助:
    南京市医学科技发展项目(YKK16242)

Effectiveness of laparoscopic total transvaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair in the treatment of uterine prolapse in the elderly

Hongxia Zhao, Jing Liu, Xiaowei Li, Jinchan Chen, Zhixia Wang()   

  1. Department of Gynecology, Taikang Xianlin Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210046, China
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BenQ Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210000, China
  • Received:2023-02-23 Published:2023-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Zhixia Wang
引用本文:

赵宏霞, 刘静, 李晓薇, 陈金婵, 汪志霞. 腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年子宫脱垂效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 561-565.

Hongxia Zhao, Jing Liu, Xiaowei Li, Jinchan Chen, Zhixia Wang. Effectiveness of laparoscopic total transvaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair in the treatment of uterine prolapse in the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 561-565.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术与传统子宫全切术联合同期阴道前后壁修补术在合并压力性尿失禁重度子宫脱垂老年患者的临床效果,并对远期预后进行比较。

方法

前瞻性招募2017年1月至2020年7月在泰康仙林鼓楼医院妇科门诊、住院部就诊的合并压力性尿失禁重度子宫脱垂老年患者,采用计算机随机数表法将研究对象分为对照组(n=40)及观察组(n=40)。观察组给予腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术联合同期阴道前后壁修补术,对照组给予传统子宫全切术联合同期阴道前后壁修补术。对比2组患者的手术耗时、失血量、肛门排气时间、总住院时间、总医疗费用、自感疼痛持续时间、术后12 h患者的疼痛程度、术后并发症指标。随访2年,对比2组术后2年内盆腔器官脱垂率,尿失禁影响问卷简版(IIQ-7)评分评估术后压力性尿失禁程度。

结果

观察组手术耗时、失血量、肛门排气时间、总住院时间均低于对照组,观察组总医疗费用高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组自感疼痛持续时间、术后12 h疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)均低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率低于对照组(P>0.05)。术后2年内观察组IIQ-7评分显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组盆腔脏器脱垂复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

使用腹腔镜辅助下经阴道子宫全切术,可有效改善子宫脱垂手术操作的效果及安全性,缩短手术耗时,减少术中失血量,促进术后恢复,减轻术后疼痛程度,改善压力性尿失禁症状。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic transvaginal hysterectomy and traditional hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair in elderly patients with severe uterine prolapse complicated with stress urinary incontinence, and to compare the long-term prognosis.

Methods

From January 2017 to July 2020, elderly patients with severe uterine prolapse complicated with stress urinary incontinence were prospectively recruited from the gynecological clinic and inpatient department of Taikang Xianlin Drum Tower Hospital. The subjects were divided into control group (n=40) and observation group (n=40) by computer random number table method. The observation group was given laparoscopic transvaginal total hysterectomy combined with simultaneous anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair, and the control group was given traditional total hysterectomy combined with simultaneous anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair. The operation time, blood loss, anal exhaust time, total hospitalization time, total medical expenses, self-perceived pain duration, pain severity 12 h after surgery, and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared. After two years of follow-up, the pelvic organ prolapse rate and the degree of stress urinary incontinence by incontinence impact questionnaire short form (IIQ-7) were compared between the two groups within 2 years after operation.

Results

The operation time, blood loss, anal exhaust time and total hospitalization time of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the total medical cost of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The duration of self-perceived pain and visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 12 h after operation in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P>0.05). The IIQ-7 scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group within 2 years after operation and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of pelvic organ prolapse between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

In the surgical treatment of patients with uterine prolapse, the choice of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy can effectively improve the effect and safety of surgical operation, shorten the operation time, reduce the blood loss of patients, promote postoperative recovery, reduce the severity of postoperative pain and improve the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence.

表1 2组患者一般临床资料比较[例(%)]
表2 2组患者手术情况相关指标比较(±s
表3 2组患者疼痛情况相关指标(±s
表4 2组患者术后并发症情况[例(%)]
表5 2组患者术后2年内盆腔脏器脱垂率及尿失禁评分变化
[1]
Chrysostomou A, Djokovic D, Libhaber E, et al. A randomized control trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the absence of uterine prolapse in a South African tertiary institution[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2021, 267: 73-78.
[2]
Hemming C, Constable L, Goulao B, et al. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs[J]. Health Technol Assess, 2020, 24(13): 1-220.
[3]
董爱华, 刘海燕. 子宫脱垂患者采用阴式子宫切除+阴道前后壁修补术治疗的效果分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2022, 17(16): 65-67.
[4]
崔巍, 张宇, 刘丽丽. 改良阴式子宫切除手术治疗子宫脱垂的临床效果[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2023, 38(1): 19-22.
[5]
刘志琴. 改良阴式全子宫切除术治疗子宫脱垂的效果研究[J/OL]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志, 2022, 9(9): 17-19.
[6]
李轻霞. 改良阴式子宫切除术在老年女性子宫脱垂患者治疗中的应用效果观察[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2022, 43(17): 1639-1642.
[7]
李晓婷. 阴道部分闭合术与阴式全子宫切除术治疗绝经期子宫脱垂患者的效果比较[J]. 河南医学研究, 2021, 30(31): 5793-5795.
[8]
Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L. Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 188: 108.
[9]
Kane AR, Nager CW. Midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 51: 124.
[10]
刘丹, 夏志军. 美国妇产科医师学会"盆腔器官脱垂临床实践指南(2017版)"解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2018, 34(10): 1111-1114.
[11]
Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, et al. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 225(2): 153. e151-153, e131.
[12]
龚梦, 申复进, 许学先. 开腹与腹腔镜下筋膜内全子宫切除术对盆腔器官脱垂的影响[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2022, 23(6): 624-625.
[13]
罗攀, 谢燕, 金红梅, 等. 经阴道子宫切除联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的疗效及对性生活质量影响的研究[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2022, 26(28): 57-59.
[14]
王丽芳, 陈玉兰, 黄霄行, 等. 经阴道子宫切除术+阴道前后壁修补术配合盆底训练对子宫脱垂患者盆底功能恢复情况的影响观察[J]. 广州医科大学学报, 2021, 49(5): 106-109, 120.
[15]
庞磊, 丁子俊, 邵晋凯, 等. 子宫切除术后膀胱脱垂患者腹腔镜下骶前韧带悬吊联合经会阴盆底重建术术后并发症发生的危险因素[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 27(12): 1030-1035.
[16]
李影, 郑宇. 腹腔镜下治疗老年Ⅲ度子宫脱垂合并阴道前后壁膨出的效果观察[J]. 锦州医科大学学报, 2022, 43(4): 53-56.
[17]
Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, et al. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA, 2019, 322(11): 1054-1065.
[18]
李爽, 周洪友, 杨惠芬. 腹腔镜辅助下经阴道子宫切除术与传统子宫切除术治疗子宫脱垂的疗效和预后比较[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(20): 4861-4863.
[19]
杨柳风. 阴道前后壁修补术联合阴道骶棘韧带固定术治疗子宫脱垂的效果分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2023, 38(3): 423-426.
[20]
杨阳, 陈海霞. 改良盆底重建术治疗老年子宫脱垂的疗效分析[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2023, 28(3): 489-492.
[1] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[2] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[7] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[8] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[9] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[10] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[11] 李三祥, 李佳, 刘俊峰, 吕东晨, 方晖东, 谭朝晖, 刘杰, 潘佐, 乔建坤. 基于CT影像的三维重建成像技术在腹腔镜大肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 570-574.
[12] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[13] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[14] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
[15] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
阅读次数
全文


摘要