切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 561 -565. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.05.013

论著

腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年子宫脱垂效果
赵宏霞, 刘静, 李晓薇, 陈金婵, 汪志霞()   
  1. 210046 南京,泰康仙林鼓楼医院妇科
    210000 南京医科大学附属明基医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-23 出版日期:2023-10-18
  • 通信作者: 汪志霞
  • 基金资助:
    南京市医学科技发展项目(YKK16242)

Effectiveness of laparoscopic total transvaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair in the treatment of uterine prolapse in the elderly

Hongxia Zhao, Jing Liu, Xiaowei Li, Jinchan Chen, Zhixia Wang()   

  1. Department of Gynecology, Taikang Xianlin Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210046, China
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BenQ Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210000, China
  • Received:2023-02-23 Published:2023-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Zhixia Wang
引用本文:

赵宏霞, 刘静, 李晓薇, 陈金婵, 汪志霞. 腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年子宫脱垂效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 561-565.

Hongxia Zhao, Jing Liu, Xiaowei Li, Jinchan Chen, Zhixia Wang. Effectiveness of laparoscopic total transvaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair in the treatment of uterine prolapse in the elderly[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 561-565.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术与传统子宫全切术联合同期阴道前后壁修补术在合并压力性尿失禁重度子宫脱垂老年患者的临床效果,并对远期预后进行比较。

方法

前瞻性招募2017年1月至2020年7月在泰康仙林鼓楼医院妇科门诊、住院部就诊的合并压力性尿失禁重度子宫脱垂老年患者,采用计算机随机数表法将研究对象分为对照组(n=40)及观察组(n=40)。观察组给予腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术联合同期阴道前后壁修补术,对照组给予传统子宫全切术联合同期阴道前后壁修补术。对比2组患者的手术耗时、失血量、肛门排气时间、总住院时间、总医疗费用、自感疼痛持续时间、术后12 h患者的疼痛程度、术后并发症指标。随访2年,对比2组术后2年内盆腔器官脱垂率,尿失禁影响问卷简版(IIQ-7)评分评估术后压力性尿失禁程度。

结果

观察组手术耗时、失血量、肛门排气时间、总住院时间均低于对照组,观察组总医疗费用高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组自感疼痛持续时间、术后12 h疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)均低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率低于对照组(P>0.05)。术后2年内观察组IIQ-7评分显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组盆腔脏器脱垂复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

使用腹腔镜辅助下经阴道子宫全切术,可有效改善子宫脱垂手术操作的效果及安全性,缩短手术耗时,减少术中失血量,促进术后恢复,减轻术后疼痛程度,改善压力性尿失禁症状。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic transvaginal hysterectomy and traditional hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair in elderly patients with severe uterine prolapse complicated with stress urinary incontinence, and to compare the long-term prognosis.

Methods

From January 2017 to July 2020, elderly patients with severe uterine prolapse complicated with stress urinary incontinence were prospectively recruited from the gynecological clinic and inpatient department of Taikang Xianlin Drum Tower Hospital. The subjects were divided into control group (n=40) and observation group (n=40) by computer random number table method. The observation group was given laparoscopic transvaginal total hysterectomy combined with simultaneous anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair, and the control group was given traditional total hysterectomy combined with simultaneous anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair. The operation time, blood loss, anal exhaust time, total hospitalization time, total medical expenses, self-perceived pain duration, pain severity 12 h after surgery, and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared. After two years of follow-up, the pelvic organ prolapse rate and the degree of stress urinary incontinence by incontinence impact questionnaire short form (IIQ-7) were compared between the two groups within 2 years after operation.

Results

The operation time, blood loss, anal exhaust time and total hospitalization time of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the total medical cost of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The duration of self-perceived pain and visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 12 h after operation in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P>0.05). The IIQ-7 scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group within 2 years after operation and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of pelvic organ prolapse between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

In the surgical treatment of patients with uterine prolapse, the choice of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy can effectively improve the effect and safety of surgical operation, shorten the operation time, reduce the blood loss of patients, promote postoperative recovery, reduce the severity of postoperative pain and improve the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence.

表1 2组患者一般临床资料比较[例(%)]
表2 2组患者手术情况相关指标比较(±s
表3 2组患者疼痛情况相关指标(±s
表4 2组患者术后并发症情况[例(%)]
表5 2组患者术后2年内盆腔脏器脱垂率及尿失禁评分变化
[1]
Chrysostomou A, Djokovic D, Libhaber E, et al. A randomized control trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the absence of uterine prolapse in a South African tertiary institution[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2021, 267: 73-78.
[2]
Hemming C, Constable L, Goulao B, et al. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs[J]. Health Technol Assess, 2020, 24(13): 1-220.
[3]
董爱华, 刘海燕. 子宫脱垂患者采用阴式子宫切除+阴道前后壁修补术治疗的效果分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2022, 17(16): 65-67.
[4]
崔巍, 张宇, 刘丽丽. 改良阴式子宫切除手术治疗子宫脱垂的临床效果[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2023, 38(1): 19-22.
[5]
刘志琴. 改良阴式全子宫切除术治疗子宫脱垂的效果研究[J/OL]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志, 2022, 9(9): 17-19.
[6]
李轻霞. 改良阴式子宫切除术在老年女性子宫脱垂患者治疗中的应用效果观察[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2022, 43(17): 1639-1642.
[7]
李晓婷. 阴道部分闭合术与阴式全子宫切除术治疗绝经期子宫脱垂患者的效果比较[J]. 河南医学研究, 2021, 30(31): 5793-5795.
[8]
Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L. Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 188: 108.
[9]
Kane AR, Nager CW. Midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 51: 124.
[10]
刘丹, 夏志军. 美国妇产科医师学会"盆腔器官脱垂临床实践指南(2017版)"解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2018, 34(10): 1111-1114.
[11]
Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, et al. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 225(2): 153. e151-153, e131.
[12]
龚梦, 申复进, 许学先. 开腹与腹腔镜下筋膜内全子宫切除术对盆腔器官脱垂的影响[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2022, 23(6): 624-625.
[13]
罗攀, 谢燕, 金红梅, 等. 经阴道子宫切除联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的疗效及对性生活质量影响的研究[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2022, 26(28): 57-59.
[14]
王丽芳, 陈玉兰, 黄霄行, 等. 经阴道子宫切除术+阴道前后壁修补术配合盆底训练对子宫脱垂患者盆底功能恢复情况的影响观察[J]. 广州医科大学学报, 2021, 49(5): 106-109, 120.
[15]
庞磊, 丁子俊, 邵晋凯, 等. 子宫切除术后膀胱脱垂患者腹腔镜下骶前韧带悬吊联合经会阴盆底重建术术后并发症发生的危险因素[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 27(12): 1030-1035.
[16]
李影, 郑宇. 腹腔镜下治疗老年Ⅲ度子宫脱垂合并阴道前后壁膨出的效果观察[J]. 锦州医科大学学报, 2022, 43(4): 53-56.
[17]
Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, et al. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA, 2019, 322(11): 1054-1065.
[18]
李爽, 周洪友, 杨惠芬. 腹腔镜辅助下经阴道子宫切除术与传统子宫切除术治疗子宫脱垂的疗效和预后比较[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(20): 4861-4863.
[19]
杨柳风. 阴道前后壁修补术联合阴道骶棘韧带固定术治疗子宫脱垂的效果分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2023, 38(3): 423-426.
[20]
杨阳, 陈海霞. 改良盆底重建术治疗老年子宫脱垂的疗效分析[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2023, 28(3): 489-492.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?