切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 164 -168. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.02.010

临床论著

补片固定方式对腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补患者术后康复的影响
刘庆国1,(), 渠时学1, 邓荣文1, 李青1, 程言磊1, 史志平1, 李承良1, 魏汉清1, 王雷1   
  1. 1. 221700 江苏徐州,丰县人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-30 出版日期:2023-04-18
  • 通信作者: 刘庆国
  • 基金资助:
    徐州市卫生健康委科技项目(XWKYHT20200003)

Effects of mesh fixation methods in laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair on postoperative rehabilitation of patients

Qingguo Liu1,(), Shixue Qu1, Rongwen Deng1, Qing Li1, Yanlei Cheng1, Zhiping Shi1, Chengliang Li1, Hanqing Wei1, Lei Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Fengxian People's Hospital, Xuzhou, 221700, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2022-07-30 Published:2023-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Qingguo Liu
引用本文:

刘庆国, 渠时学, 邓荣文, 李青, 程言磊, 史志平, 李承良, 魏汉清, 王雷. 补片固定方式对腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补患者术后康复的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 164-168.

Qingguo Liu, Shixue Qu, Rongwen Deng, Qing Li, Yanlei Cheng, Zhiping Shi, Chengliang Li, Hanqing Wei, Lei Wang. Effects of mesh fixation methods in laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair on postoperative rehabilitation of patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 164-168.

目的

分析不同固定补片方式应用于腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)中对腹股沟患者术后康复的影响。

方法

回顾性收集2019年11月至2021年6月在丰县人民医院普外科治疗的95例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,根据补片固定方式不同分为A组(医用胶,30例)、B组(常规缝合,28例)、C组(单针缝合,37例)。统计分析3组一般资料、手术相关情况,比较3组术后1、3、5、7 d疼痛情况及术前、术后1个月生活质量。随访术后早期并发症,慢性疼痛及复发情况。

结果

C组手术时间、恢复日常活动时间、术后住院时间短于B组、A组(P<0.05),住院费用低于B组、A组(P<0.05)。3组术后1、3、5、7 d视觉模拟评分(VAS)均呈逐渐降低趋势,不同时间点比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后5、7 d VAS评分,C组均低于B组和A组(P<0.05)。术后1个月与术前比较,3组生活质量各项评分均升高,C组生理职能、社会功能、躯体疼痛、生命活力评分高于A组和B组(P<0.05)。术后早期(≤1个月),3组总并发症发生率(10.00%、7.14%、10.81%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);所有患者均获随访1年以上,随访期间,3组慢性疼痛(6.67%、3.57%、10.81%)及复发率(0、0、2.70%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在TAPP术中采用单针缝合固定补片与医用胶、常规缝合固定相比,可有效缩短手术时间,促进术后恢复,减少住院费用和术后疼痛,提高生活质量,且不增加腹股沟疝的复发率。

Objective

To analyze the effect of different mesh fixation methods in laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair on postoperative rehabilitation.

Methods

Clinical data of 95 patients with inguinal hernia treated in the Department of General Surgery of Fengxian People's Hospital from November 2019 to June 2021 were retrospectively collected. All patients were divided into group A (30 cases), group B (28 cases) and group C (37 cases) according to different mesh fixation methods. Group A was fixed with medical adhesive, group B was fixed with conventional suture, and group C was fixed with single needle suture. The general data, operation conditions were analyzed. The pain at 1, 3, 5 and 7 d after operation and the quality of life before and one month after operation were compared among the three groups. Early postoperative complications, Chronic pain and recurrence during follow-up were compared among the three groups.

Results

The operation time, recovery time during hospitalization and hospital stay time of group C were shorter than those of group B and group A (P<0.05), and the hospital costs in the group C were lower than those in group B and group A (P<0.05). The score of visual analogue scale (VAS) of the three groups decreased gradually at 1, 3, 5 and 7d after operation, and the difference was statistically significant at different time points. The VAS scores of group C were lower than those of group B and group A at 5 and 7d after operation (P<0.05). After 1 month of operation, all the scores of quality of life in the three groups were higher than those before operation, and the scores of physical function, social function, physical pain and vital energy of group C were higher than those of groups A and B (P<0.05). In the early postoperative period (≤1 month), the total complication rates among the three groups were 10.00%, 7.14%, and 10.81%, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). All patients were followed up for more than 1 year. During the follow-up period, the chronic pain rates (6.67%, 3.57%, 10.81%) and recurrence rates (0.00%, 0.00%, 2.70%) of the 3 groups were not significantly different (P>0.05).

Conclusion

When treating inguinal hernia patients with TAPP operation, compared with medical adhesive fixation and conventional suture fixation, single needle suture can effectively shorten the operation time, promote postoperative recovery, reduce hospitalization expenses and postoperative pain, improve the quality of life, and do not increase the recurrence rate of inguinal hernia.

表1 3组一般资料比较[例(%)]
表2 3组手术相关情况比较(±s
表3 3组术后不同时间疼痛情况比较(分,±s
表4 3组手术前后生活质量比较
表5 3组术后早期并发症、慢性疼痛及复发情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
秦昌富, 陈杰, 申英末, 等. 基于中国疝病注册登记随访系统的腹外疝治疗现状分析与流行病学研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2021, 20(7): 785-789.
[2]
李瑞斌, 吴攀, 万智恒. 经腹腹膜前腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术在腹股沟疝无张力修补中的应用[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2020, 29(10): 1275-1279.
[3]
黄亮, 余壮明, 李军, 等. 自固定聚丙烯/聚乳酸复合补片改善腹股沟疝无张力修补后的慢性疼痛[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2018, 22(6): 908-913.
[4]
张叶广, 郭娟, 秦校芳, 等. 生物胶固定补片与疝钉固定补片在腹股沟疝TEP术中的应用对比[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2021, 24(10): 815-817.
[5]
陈孝平,汪建平. 外科学[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 321-331.
[6]
孙兵, 车晓明. 视觉模拟评分法(VAS)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2012, 28(6): 645-645.
[7]
王坤. 健康状况调查简表(SF-36)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2012, 28(6): 571-571.
[8]
Bakker WJ, Roos MM, Meijer RP, et al. Influence of previous laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair on performing radical prostatectomy: a nationwide survey among urological surgeons[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(6): 2583-2591.
[9]
Johansen N, Miserez M, de Beaux A, et al. Surgical Strategy for Contralateral Groin Management in Patients Scheduled for Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: An International Web-Based Surveymonkey® Questionnaire: Strategy for Contralateral Groin Management during Inguinal Hernia Repair[J]. Scand J Surg, 2021, 110(3): 368-372.
[10]
高大爽, 项本宏. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效及术后并发症的危险因素分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(7): 492-496.
[11]
王大川, 鲍峰, 刘文, 等. 单点固定与不固定补片的完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术疗效比较[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2018, 21(4): 271-275.
[12]
陈伟立, 黄进团. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前成人腹股沟疝修补术中不同补片固定方法的应用效果比较[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2019, 16(4): 155-157.
[13]
王翀, 朱应昌, 梁伟潮, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中补片缝合固定对减轻腹股沟疝患者术后疼痛的效果分析[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2019(9): 631-633.
[14]
孙凯, 张泽俊, 张亚, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(3): 243-246.
[15]
王文超, 邢小平, 郑志. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与完全腹膜外修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效及术后血清肿情况分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 142-145.
[16]
陆晶晶, 吴永丰. 全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中单点固定法与免气囊免固定法的对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 858-861.
[17]
王殿琛, 陈建民, 陈亚柯, 等. 自固定补片与普通聚丙烯补片在成年女性腹股沟疝李金斯坦修补术中应用的随机对照研究[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2019, 26(6): 668-672.
[18]
杨凯, 侯远发, 王洪健, 等. 改良补片缝合固定法在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2022, 27(3): 203-205.
[19]
陈晓鑫. 不同手术路径下腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛比较及慢性疼痛因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(3): 265-269.
[20]
刘进军, 张鹏, 余波, 等. Ⅰ、Ⅱ型腹股沟疝腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中不固定补片与缝合固定补片的比较研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2017, 22(5): 368-372.
[21]
Kapiris SA, Brough WA, Royston CM, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal(TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017 patients [J]. Surg Endosc, 2001, 15(9): 972-975.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 经阴道膀胱膨出前盆补片修补术 + 阴道后壁修补术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 128-128.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要