切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 570 -573. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.05.018

临床论著

聚丙烯和聚乳酸复合补片对腹腔镜疝修补术患者疗效及应激状态的影响
蔡露萍1, 邹华1,†(), 李君1, 朱海燕1, 顾敏晖1, 李霞1, 成琼1   
  1. 1. 215600　江苏省，张家港市中医医院手术室
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-01 出版日期:2022-10-18
  • 通信作者: 邹华
  • 基金资助:
    张家港市青年科技项目(ZJGQNKJ201931)

Effect of polypropylene and polylactic acid composite mesh on the therapeutic effect and stress state of patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair

Luping Cai1, Hua Zou1,†(), Jun Li1, Haiyan Zhu1, Minhui Gu1, Xia Li1, Qiong Cheng1   

  1. 1. Operating Room of Zhangjiagang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Suzhou 215600, China
  • Received:2022-07-01 Published:2022-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Hua Zou
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

蔡露萍, 邹华, 李君, 朱海燕, 顾敏晖, 李霞, 成琼. 聚丙烯和聚乳酸复合补片对腹腔镜疝修补术患者疗效及应激状态的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 570-573.

Luping Cai, Hua Zou, Jun Li, Haiyan Zhu, Minhui Gu, Xia Li, Qiong Cheng. Effect of polypropylene and polylactic acid composite mesh on the therapeutic effect and stress state of patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 570-573.

目的

观察聚丙烯和聚乳酸复合补片对腹腔镜疝修补术患者应激状态的影响及其治疗效果。

方法

选择张家港市中医医院2018年12月至2021年6月以来的152例拟行腹腔镜手术治疗的腹股沟疝患者作为研究对象，随机分为对照组（76例）和观察组（76例）。对照组采用聚丙烯补片，观察组采用聚丙烯和聚乳酸复合补片。比较2组手术时间、术中并发症发生情况、术后住院时间、术后下床时间、住院费用、术后疼痛情况、血清炎性因子白细胞介素-6（IL-6）、C反应蛋白（CRP）水平及并发症情况。

结果

观察组手术时间、住院花费高于对照组（P<0.05）；术后1 d、10 d、1个月、3个月，2组患者VAS评分均逐渐下降，且观察组VAS评分低于对照组（P<0.05）。术后与术前相比，2组血清IL-6、CRP水平显著升高（P<0.05），且观察组指标均优于对照组（P<0.05）。观察组患者并发症总发生率3.95%（3/76），低于对照组的9.21%（7/76），但2组比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。随访1年，观察组复发率为0（0/76），对照组复发率为1.32%（1/76），二者比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。

结论

采用自固定聚丙烯和聚乳酸复合补片能够减少患者术后应激反应，不增加并发症，利于患者术后恢复。

关键词: 疝，腹股沟, 疝修补术, 腹腔镜, 补片, 疗效, 应激反应
Objective

To compare the effects of polypropylene and polylactic acid composite mesh on the stress state of patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair and its therapeutic effect.

Methods

A total of 152 patients with inguinal hernia undergoing laparoscopic surgery in our hospital from December 2018 to June 2021 were selected as the research objects and randomly divided into control group (76 cases) and observation group (76 cases). The control group was treated with polypropylene mesh, and the observation group was treated with polypropylene and polylactic acid mesh. Operation time, intraoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative time to get out of bed, hospitalization costs, postoperative pain, serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time and hospitalization cost in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). At 1 d, 10 d, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery, VAS scores in both groups decreased gradually, and VAS scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The serum IL-6 and CRP levels in both groups were significantly increased after operation compared with before operation (P<0.05), and the indexes in observation group were better than those in the control group (P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the observation group was 3.59% (3/76), lower than the 9.21% (7/76) in the control group, but there was no statistical significance between the two groups (P>0.05). The recurrence rate was 0.00% (0/76) in the observation group and 1.32% (1/76) in the control group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The use of self-immobilized polypropylene and polylactic acid composite mesh can reduce the postoperative stress reaction of patients, which does not increase and occur complications, which is conducive to postoperative recovery of patients, and can be popularized in clinical application.

Key words: Hernia, inguinal, Herniorrhaphy, Laparoscope, Mesh, Efficacy, Stress reaction
表1 2组术后指标比较（±s）
组别 例数 住院时间(d) 下床时间(h) 住院费用(元)
观察组 76 3.16±0.68 7.95±4.40 12 360.13±1223.90
对照组 76 3.39±0.55 8.03±2.34 6982.95±894.92
t   -2.187 -1.007 5.101
P   0.319 0.210 0.001
表2 2组术后疼痛情况比较（分，±s）
组别 例数 1 d 10 d 1个月 3个月
观察组 76 2.00±0.87 1.68±0.62 0.74±0.45 0.21±0.41
对照组 76 3.26±1.06 2.53±0.76 1.79±0.62 0.71±0.46
t   -2.774 -3.107 -2.760 -3.754
P   0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001
表3 2组炎性因子水平比较（±s）
组别 例数   白细胞介素6 (ng/L) C反应蛋白(mg/L)
观察组 76 术前 7.93±1.98 2.28±0.41
    术后 11.75±3.14*# 5.39±0.85*#
对照组 76 术前 7.66±1.97 2.33±0.21
    术后 16.68±3.65* 11.18±0.85*
表4 2组术后并发症比较[例（%）]
组别 例数 阴囊血清肿 慢性疼痛 异物感 总发生率
观察组 76 3(3.95) 0 0 3(3.95)
对照组 76 4(5.26) 2(2.63) 1(1.32) 7(9.21)
χ2         12.774
P         0.101
[1]
Köckerling F. TEP for elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair in men: what do we know?[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(3): 439-459.
[2]
Hernia Surge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[3]
Pawlak M, East B, de Beaux A C. Algorithm for management of an incarcerated inguinal hernia in the emergency settings with manual reduction. Taxis, the technique and its safety[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(5): 1253-1258.
[4]
Yasukawa D, Aisu Y, Hori T. Crucial anatomy and technical cues for laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair: Advanced manipulation for groin hernias in adults[J]. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2020, 12(7): 307-325.
[5]
孙叶飞，陈晓晨. 腹腔镜下腹股沟嵌顿疝修补术全程护理干预效果[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2020, 49(1): 84-87.
[6]
屈媛媛，邹鲁，潘小燕, 等. 超声引导下腹横筋膜阻滞对单侧腹股沟疝修补术老年患者术后疼痛及认知功能的影响[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2022, 43(1): 95-99.
[7]
黄亮，余壮明，李军, 等. 自固定聚丙烯/聚乳酸复合补片改善腹股沟疝无张力修补后的慢性疼痛[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2018, 22(6): 908-913.
[8]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组，中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(7): 721-724.
[9]
严广斌. 视觉模拟评分法[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(2): 273.
[10]
Koppatz HE, Harju JI, Sirén JE, et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(11): 4857-4865.
[11]
陈明，陈云，李昕. TEP与TAPP治疗小儿腹股沟疝的临床效果及血清炎性因子变化分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2021, 20(9): 983-986.
[12]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组. 青年腹股沟疝诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2020版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(7): 754-757.
[13]
高瑛，石坤和，顾渊, 等. 3D立体补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(2): 189-191.
[14]
陆泳昕，吴俊彪，单法勇. 脱细胞基质补片无张力疝修补术对腹股沟疝患者血清炎性因子及精液质量的影响[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2018, 15(6): 241-243.
[15]
Chatzimavroudis G, Papaziogas B, Koutelidakis I, et al. Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair using polypropylene mesh fixed with sutures vs. self-fixating polypropylene mesh: a prospective randomized comparative study[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(2): 193-198.
[16]
Verhagen T, Zwaans WA, Loos MJ, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with a standard polypropylene mesh for open inguinal hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2016, 103(7): 812-818.
[17]
Hirano T. IL-6 in inflammation, autoimmunity and cancer[J]. Int Immunol, 2021, 33(3): 127-148.
[18]
Osimo E F, Baxter L J, Lewis G, et al. Prevalence of low-grade inflammation in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of CRP levels[J]. Psychol Med, 2019, 49(12): 1958-1970.
[19]
肖旺，刘路遥，汪明明, 等. 自固定补片与聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用效果比较[J/OL ]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(1): 62-65.
[1] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[10] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[11] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[12] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[13] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[14] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[15] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号