腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠联合His角重建术治疗胃食管反流病的短期疗效

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.05.005

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 510 -515. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.05.005

临床论著

腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠联合His角重建术治疗胃食管反流病的短期疗效

杜兴¹, 罗颖¹, 高颖¹, 董庆申², 刘殿刚¹^,^†(

), 汪忠镐³, 郑煜琳¹

^1. 100053　北京，首都医科大学宣武医院普通外科
^2. 100053　北京市仁和医院普通外科
^3. 100053　北京，首都医科大学宣武医院血管外科

收稿日期:2022-03-02 出版日期:2022-10-18
通信作者: 刘殿刚
基金资助:
首都卫生发展科研专项项目(首发2020-2-2035)

Short-term efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication combined with the reconstruction of His angle in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Xing Du¹, Ying Luo¹, Ying Gao¹, Qingshen Dong², Diangang Liu¹^,^†(), Zhonggao Wang³, Yulin Zheng¹

^1. Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
^2. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Renhe Hospital, Beijing 100053, China
^3. Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China

Received:2022-03-02 Published:2022-10-18
Corresponding author: Diangang Liu

全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用

引用本文：

杜兴, 罗颖, 高颖, 董庆申, 刘殿刚, 汪忠镐, 郑煜琳. 腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠联合His角重建术治疗胃食管反流病的短期疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 510-515.

Xing Du, Ying Luo, Ying Gao, Qingshen Dong, Diangang Liu, Zhonggao Wang, Yulin Zheng. Short-term efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication combined with the reconstruction of His angle in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 510-515.

目的

探讨腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术联合His角重建治疗胃食管反流病（GERD）的效果。

方法

回顾性分析2018年10月至2021年2月于首都医科大学宣武医院普通外科接受Nissen胃底折叠（360°）+His角重建术和单纯Nissen胃底折叠术GERD患者的临床资料，观察比较两种术式抗反流效果的差异、患者对手术治疗满意度等情况。

结果

本研究共纳入GERD患者98例，其中Nissen+His角重建组为52例，Nissen组为46例。术后6个月时，2组患者GERD相关症状（食管症状：反流、胃灼热、胸背痛及剑突下顶胀感。食管外症状：咳嗽、喘息、咽部异物感）评分均显著低于治疗前（P<0.05）。术后症状评分中，Nissen+His角重建组反流、胃灼热症状评分低于Nissen组，差异有统计学意义（反流：Z=－2.466，P=0.014；胃灼热：Z=－2.674，P=0.007）；2组其他症状评分差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。2组术后功能性并发症（包括吞咽困难、腹胀、难以嗳气、排气增多及慢性腹部疼痛）发生率相似，经保守治疗均获得明显缓解。Nissen+His角重建组患者对手术治疗满意度为94.2%（49/52），Nissen组患者满意度为91.3%（42/46），2组患者手术满意度差异无统计学意义（P=0.866）。

结论

Nissen胃底折叠+His角重建术与Nissen胃底折叠术均有较好的抗反流疗效，手术并发症少、轻微，患者满意度高。与Nissen组相比，Nissen+His角重建组控制反流、胃灼热症状更佳，该结果需要前瞻性、大样本、长期随访结果予以证实。

关键词: 胃食管反流病, 胃底折叠术, 腹腔镜

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of Nissen fundoplication combined with the reconstruction of His angle for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods

The clinical data of GERD patients who received Nissen fundoplication combined with His angle reconstruction or Nissen fundoplication alone in the department of general surgery of Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University from October 2018 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The differences of the anti-reflux effects and the satisfaction of the two procedures were observed and compared.

Results

98 GERD patients were included in this study, including 52 patients in the Nissen+His angle reconstruction group and 46 patients in the Nissen group. 6 months after operation, GERD related symptoms (esophageal symptoms: reflux, heart burn, chest and back pain, and distension in the lower of xiphoid; extraesophageal symptoms: cough, wheezing, foreign body sensation of pharynx) scores were significantly lower than those before treatment (all P<0.05). In postoperative symptoms scores, score of the reflux and heart burn symptom of the Nissen+His angle reconstruction group were lower than that of Nissen group, the difference was statistically significant (reflux: Z=-2.466, P=0.014; heart burn: Z=-2.674, P=0.007). There was no statistical difference in the scores of other symptom between the two groups (all P>0.05). Postoperative functional complications (including dysphagia, abdominal distention, difficult belching, increased exhaust and chronic abdominal pain) were similar in both groups, and were significantly relieved after conservative treatment. The satisfaction of the group of Nissen+His angle reconstruction and the group of Nissen was 94.2% (49/52) and 91.3% (42/46), respectively, and no significant difference was observed (P=0.866).

Conclusion

Both Nissen+His angle reconstruction and Nissen fundoplication alone had good anti-reflux efficacy, with few and mild surgical complications and high patient satisfaction. Compared to Nissen group, Nissen+His angle reconstruction group had better control of reflux and heart burn symptoms, which required prospective, large-sample, and long-term follow-up results to confirm.

Key words: Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Fundoplication, Laparoscopes

图1 腹腔镜Nissen +His角重建操作要点注：1A缝合两侧膈肌脚，缩小食管裂孔；1B、1C分别为His角重建时折叠瓣、膈肌部位进针位置；1D Nissen折叠联合His角重建完成效果

表1 2组患者基本特征

组别	例数	性别[例(%)]		年龄(岁, ±s)	体质量指数(kg/m², ±s)	反流性食管炎[例(%)]	24h MII-pH监测M(P25,P75)				HRM M(P25,P75)
组别	例数	男	女	年龄(岁, ±s)	体质量指数(kg/m², ±s)	反流性食管炎[例(%)]	Demeester积分	AET(%)	BET(%)	反流总次数	LES(mmHg)		UES(mmHg)
Nissen+His角重建组	52	21(40.4)	31(59.6)	52.37±16.88	24.7±5.4	37(71.1)	25.3(14.6,38.9)	9.7(5.1,2.8)	2.4(1.0,4.3)	79(55.1,84)	6.9(3.4,11.9)		47.1(27.1,72.5)
Nissen组	46	19(41.3)	27(58.7)	54.35±14.06	26.7±4.3	28(60.9)	23.3(14.1,37.7)	8.2(3.6,1.0)	2.2(0.8,3.2)	74(52.8,77.3)	7.8(5.2,11.7)		48.3(27.5,73.1)
P		0.926		0.532	0.413	0.282	0.253	0.287	0.054	0.234	0.265	0.576

表1 2组患者基本特征

组别	例数	性别[例(%)]		年龄(岁, ±s)	体质量指数(kg/m², ±s)	反流性食管炎[例(%)]	24h MII-pH监测M(P25,P75)				HRM M(P25,P75)
组别	例数	男	女	年龄(岁, ±s)	体质量指数(kg/m², ±s)	反流性食管炎[例(%)]	Demeester积分	AET(%)	BET(%)	反流总次数	LES(mmHg)		UES(mmHg)
Nissen+His角重建组	52	21(40.4)	31(59.6)	52.37±16.88	24.7±5.4	37(71.1)	25.3(14.6,38.9)	9.7(5.1,2.8)	2.4(1.0,4.3)	79(55.1,84)	6.9(3.4,11.9)		47.1(27.1,72.5)
Nissen组	46	19(41.3)	27(58.7)	54.35±14.06	26.7±4.3	28(60.9)	23.3(14.1,37.7)	8.2(3.6,1.0)	2.2(0.8,3.2)	74(52.8,77.3)	7.8(5.2,11.7)		48.3(27.5,73.1)
P		0.926		0.532	0.413	0.282	0.253	0.287	0.054	0.234	0.265	0.576

表2 2组患者术前症状评分[M（P25，P75）]

组别	例数	食管症状				食管外症状
组别	例数	反流	胃灼热	胃灼热	剑突下顶胀感	咳嗽	喘息	咽部异物感
Nissen+His角重建组	52	7(6,8)	7(5,8)	4(0,6)	3(0,6)	2(0,5)	4(0,5)	4.5(0,6)
Nissen组	46	7(5,7)	7(5,8)	1(0,5)	0(0,5)	2(0,4.3)	3(0,5)	3(0,5)
Z		-1.151	-0.134	-1.334	-1.637	-0.615	-0.853	-1.115
P		0.25	0.894	0.182	0.102	0.539	0.394	0.265

表2 2组患者术前症状评分[M（P25，P75）]

组别	例数	食管症状				食管外症状
组别	例数	反流	胃灼热	胃灼热	剑突下顶胀感	咳嗽	喘息	咽部异物感
Nissen+His角重建组	52	7(6,8)	7(5,8)	4(0,6)	3(0,6)	2(0,5)	4(0,5)	4.5(0,6)
Nissen组	46	7(5,7)	7(5,8)	1(0,5)	0(0,5)	2(0,4.3)	3(0,5)	3(0,5)
Z		-1.151	-0.134	-1.334	-1.637	-0.615	-0.853	-1.115
P		0.25	0.894	0.182	0.102	0.539	0.394	0.265

表3 2组患者抗反流手术前后症状评分[M（P25，P75）]

组别			术前	术后	Z	P
Nissen+His角重建组
	食管症状
		反流	7(6,8)	0(0,2)	-6.317	<0.001
		胃灼热	7(5,8)	0(0,2)	-6.244	<0.001
		胸背痛	4(0,6)	0(0,2)	-4.989	<0.001
		剑突下顶胀感	3(0,6)	0(0,1.5)	-4.802	<0.001
	食管外症状
		咳嗽	2(0,5)	0(0,2)	-4.672	<0.001
		喘息	4(0,5)	0(0,2)	-4.920	<0.001
		咽部异物感	4.5(0,6)	0(0,2)	-5.131	<0.001
Nissen组
	食管症状
		反流	7(5,7)	2(0,3)	-5.813	<0.001
		胃灼热	7(5,8)	2(0,2)	-5.866	<0.001
		胸背痛	1(0,5)	0(0,0)	-4.220	<0.001
		剑突下顶胀感	0(0,5)	0(0,0)	-4.031	<0.001
	食管外症状
		咳嗽	2(0,4.3)	0(0,2)	-4.223	<0.001
		喘息	3(0,5)	0(0,2)	-4.405	<0.001
		咽部异物感	5(3,6)	2(0,2.3)	-5.363	<0.001

表3 2组患者抗反流手术前后症状评分[M（P25，P75）]

组别			术前	术后	Z	P
Nissen+His角重建组
	食管症状
		反流	7(6,8)	0(0,2)	-6.317	<0.001
		胃灼热	7(5,8)	0(0,2)	-6.244	<0.001
		胸背痛	4(0,6)	0(0,2)	-4.989	<0.001
		剑突下顶胀感	3(0,6)	0(0,1.5)	-4.802	<0.001
	食管外症状
		咳嗽	2(0,5)	0(0,2)	-4.672	<0.001
		喘息	4(0,5)	0(0,2)	-4.920	<0.001
		咽部异物感	4.5(0,6)	0(0,2)	-5.131	<0.001
Nissen组
	食管症状
		反流	7(5,7)	2(0,3)	-5.813	<0.001
		胃灼热	7(5,8)	2(0,2)	-5.866	<0.001
		胸背痛	1(0,5)	0(0,0)	-4.220	<0.001
		剑突下顶胀感	0(0,5)	0(0,0)	-4.031	<0.001
	食管外症状
		咳嗽	2(0,4.3)	0(0,2)	-4.223	<0.001
		喘息	3(0,5)	0(0,2)	-4.405	<0.001
		咽部异物感	5(3,6)	2(0,2.3)	-5.363	<0.001

表4 2组患者术后症状比较[M(P25, P75)]

组别	例数	食管症状				食管外症状
组别	例数	反流	胃灼热	胸背痛	剑突下顶胀感	咳嗽	喘息	咽部异物感
Nissen+His角重建组	52	0(0,2)	0(0,2)	0(0,2)	0(0,0)	0(0,2)	0(0,2.5)	0(0,2)
Nissen组	46	2(0,3)	1(0,2)	0(0,2)	0(0,0)	0(0,2)	0(0,2)	0(0,2.5)
Z		-2.466	-2.674	-1.319	-1.287	-0.279	-1.027	-1.002
P		0.014	0.007	0.187	0.198	0.78	0.305	0.317

表4 2组患者术后症状比较[M(P25, P75)]

组别	例数	食管症状				食管外症状
组别	例数	反流	胃灼热	胸背痛	剑突下顶胀感	咳嗽	喘息	咽部异物感
Nissen+His角重建组	52	0(0,2)	0(0,2)	0(0,2)	0(0,0)	0(0,2)	0(0,2.5)	0(0,2)
Nissen组	46	2(0,3)	1(0,2)	0(0,2)	0(0,0)	0(0,2)	0(0,2)	0(0,2.5)
Z		-2.466	-2.674	-1.319	-1.287	-0.279	-1.027	-1.002
P		0.014	0.007	0.187	0.198	0.78	0.305	0.317

[1]	Katzka D A, Kahrilas P J. Advances in the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. BMJ, 2020, 371: m3786.
[2]	Maret-ouda J, Markar S R, Lagergren J. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Review[J]. JAMA, 2020, 324(24): 2536-2547.
[3]	Zerbib F, Bredenoord A J, Fass R, et al. ESNM/ANMS consensus paper: Diagnosis and management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2021, 33(4): e14075.
[4]	Mehta R S, Staller K, Chan A T. Review of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease[J]. JAMA, 2021, 325(14): 1472.
[5]	Ei-serag H B, Sweet S, Winchester C C, et al. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review[J]. Gut, 2014, 63(6): 871-880.
[6]	Zhang M, Hou Z K, Huang Z B, et al. Dietary and Lifestyle Factors Related to Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2021, 17: 305-323.
[7]	Ogawa M, Arihiro S, Matsuhashi N, et al. The early therapeutic response at 2 weeks is a crucial predictor of proton pump inhibitor-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Esophagus, 2021, 18(2): 398-406.
[8]	Mallah N, Turner JM, Gonzalez-Barcala FJ, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and asthma exacerbation: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Pediatr Allergy Immunol, 2022, 33(1): e13655.
[9]	汪忠镐，胡志伟. 胃食管反流病及其食管外反流:一个常被忽视的重大公共卫生问题[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(1): 5-11.
[10]	Geagea T. Laparoscopic Nissen's fundoplication: preliminary report on ten cases[J]. Surg Endosc, 1991, 5(4): 170-173.
[11]	Nissen R. A simple operation for control of reflux esophagitis[J]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr, 1956, 86(Suppl 20): 590-592.
[12]	Demeester S R. Laparoscopic Hernia Repair and Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease[J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2020, 30(2): 309-324.
[13]	Sanchez-Casalongue M E, Farrell T M. Laparoscopic Posterior Partial Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(6): 642-648.
[14]	Du X, Hu Z, Yan C, et al. A meta-analysis of long follow-up outcomes of laparoscopic Nissen(total) versus Toupet(270°) fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease based on randomized controlled trials in adults[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2016, 16(1): 88.
[15]	Kumar A, Raja K, Kumar S, et al. Quality of Life in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Three Months After Laparoscopic Nissen's Fundoplication[J]. Cureus, 2020, 12(9): e10674.
[16]	Schwameis K, Oh D, Green K M, et al. Clinical outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with GERD and PPI refractory heartburn[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2020, 33(4): doz099.
[17]	Schietroma M, Colozzi S, Romano L, et al. Short- and long-term results after laparoscopic floppy Nissen fundoplication in elderly versus non-elderly patients[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2020, 16(3): 256-263.
[18]	Håkanson BS, Lundell L, Bylund A, et al. Comparison of Laparoscopic 270° Posterior Partial Fundoplication vs Total Fundoplication for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2019, 154(6): 479-486.
[19]	Trepanier M, Dumitra T, Sorial R, et al. Comparison of Dor and Nissen fundoplication after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair[J]. Surgery, 2019, 166(4): 540-546.
[20]	Hopkins R J, Irvine T, Jamieson G G, et al. Long-term follow-up of two randomized trials comparing laparoscopic Nissen 360° with anterior 90° partial fundoplication[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(1): 56-63.
[21]	Du X, Wu J M, Hu Z W, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen(total) versus anterior 180° fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease: A meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2017, 96(37): e8085.
[22]	胡志伟，李冉，邓昌荣, 等. 腹腔镜Nissen-Rossetti胃底折叠术治疗质子泵抑制剂依赖性胃食管反流病的效果分析[J/OL]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2021, 13(1): 73-79.
[23]	邵荣瑢，李阳，葛思堂, 等. 胃超声造影对胃食管反流解剖学病因的临床诊断价值[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(1): 101-103.
[24]	陈甜子，柴佩，叶秀芳. 超声在胃食管反流病因诊断中的应用研究[J]. 宁夏医学杂志, 2011, 33(10): 949-951.
[25]	Zhang S, Joseph A A, Gross L, et al. Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Using Real-time Magnetic Resonance Imaging[J]. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 12112.
[26]	朱旭华. 贲门癌、食管癌切除同期胃底重建预防反流性食管炎的研究[J]. 吉林医学, 2013, 34(32): 6758-6759.
[27]	董建堂，刘孝民，王公平, 等. 人工胃底折叠重建His角预防贲门癌术后反流82例临床分析[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2006, 11(7): 497-498, 501.
[28]	秦永跃，丁旭青，刘国正, 等. 人工胃底折叠重建His角的抗反流作用——附食管胃连接部癌102例分析[J]. 中国肿瘤外科杂志, 2009, 1(6): 340-342.

[1]	代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2]	杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3]	周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4]	张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5]	王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6]	李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7]	甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8]	逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9]	李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10]	曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[11]	唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[12]	田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[13]	李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术（TAPP）[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[14]	叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[15]	夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Short-term efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication combined with the reconstruction of His angle in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Short-term efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication combined with the reconstruction of His angle in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease