切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 459 -462. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.04.021

临床论著

个性化舒适护理干预在腹腔镜下小儿腹股沟疝手术中的应用
李婷婷1, 王少华1,†(), 蒋丽2, 车利1, 葛晓燕3, 贺从涛2   
  1. 1. 236800　安徽省，亳州市人民医院手术室
    2. 236800　安徽省，亳州市人民医院小儿疝及腹壁外科
    3. 236800　安徽省，亳州市人民医院手术麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-26 出版日期:2022-08-18
  • 通信作者: 王少华
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省自然科学基金(1808085HM345)

Application of personalized comfort nursing intervention in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery in children

Tingting Li1, Shaohua Wang1,†(), Li Jiang2, Li Che1, Xiaoyan Ge3, congtao He2   

  1. 1. Operating Room, Bozhou People's Hospital, Bozhou 236800, Anhui Province, China
    2. Pediatric Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Bozhou People's Hospital, Bozhou 236800, Anhui Province, China
    3. Surgical Anesthesia Department, Bozhou People's Hospital, Bozhou 236800, Anhui Province, China
  • Received:2021-12-26 Published:2022-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Shaohua Wang
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

李婷婷, 王少华, 蒋丽, 车利, 葛晓燕, 贺从涛. 个性化舒适护理干预在腹腔镜下小儿腹股沟疝手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 459-462.

Tingting Li, Shaohua Wang, Li Jiang, Li Che, Xiaoyan Ge, congtao He. Application of personalized comfort nursing intervention in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery in children[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 459-462.

目的

研究个性化舒适性护理干预在腹腔镜下小儿腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果。

方法

选取2019年1月至2021年1月在亳州市人民医院行腹腔镜下腹股沟疝手术患儿100例作为研究对象，按照随机数字表法分为2组，每组患儿50例。对照组采用常规手术护理干预，试验组在常规护理干预的基础上实施手术个性化舒适护理干预。对比2组患儿临床疗效、术后疼痛程度、下床时间、住院时间、患儿家长对护理工作的满意度以及术后并发症。

结果

试验组的治疗总有效率（100.00%）高于对照组（96.00%），术后轻度疼痛率（70.00%）显著高于对照组（48.00%），差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）；而2组患儿中、重度疼痛率无明显差异（P>0.05）；试验组术后下床时间和住院时间均显著低于对照组（P<0.05）；试验组患儿家长总满意率为（98.00%）显著高于对照组（80.00%），差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；试验组总并发症发生率（4.00%）显著低于对照组（8.00%），差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。

结论

个性化舒适护理干预在保证临床治疗效率的同时，可以减轻患儿的疼痛程度，促进患儿临床症状的恢复，有积极的临床应用价值。

关键词: 疝，腹股沟, 儿童, 个性化舒适护理, 腹腔镜
Objective

To study the effect of humanized and comfortable nursing intervention in laparoscopic Inguinal hernia surgery in children.

Methods

A total of 100 children who underwent laparoscopic Inguinal hernia surgery in the hospital from January 2019 to January 2021 were selected as the research objects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into observation group (n=50) and control group (n=50). The control group used conventional surgical nursing intervention, and the observation group implemented surgical humanized and comfortable nursing intervention on the basis of conventional nursing intervention. The clinical efficacy, postoperative pain degree, time to get out of bed, length of hospitalization, satisfaction of the children's family with nursing work, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups of children.

Results

The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group (100.00%) was higher than that of the control group (96.00%) (P<0.05); the rate of mild postoperative pain in the observation group (70.00%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (48.00%) (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the rates of moderate and severe pain between the two groups (P>0.05); the time to get out of bed and hospital stay in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05); the overall satisfaction rate of the children’s family members in the observation group was (98.00%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (80.00%) (P<0.05); the total complication rate of the observation group (4.00%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (8.00%) (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Humanized comfort nursing intervention can reduce the pain degree of patients and promote the recovery of clinical symptoms of children while ensuring the efficiency of clinical treatment, which has positive clinical application value.

Key words: Hernia, inguinal, Child, Personalized comfort care, Laparoscopes
表1 2组患儿临床疗效对比[例（%）]
组别 例数 治愈 显效 有效 无效 总有效
试验组 50 32(64.00) 13(26.00) 5(10.00) 0(0.00) 50(100.00)a
对照组 50 29(58.00) 12(24.00) 7(14.00) 2(4.00) 48(96.00)
表2 2组患儿术后下床时间和住院时间对比（±s）
组别 例数 下床时间(h) 住院时间(d)
试验组 50 4.24±2.56 1.21±0.26
对照组 50 6.67±2.44 2.21±0.56
t值   2.68 9.73
P值   0.01 0.00
表3 2组患儿家长对护理工作的满意度情况比较[例（%）]
组别 例数 很满意 满意 基本满意 不满意 总满意
试验组 50 35(70.00) 12(24.00) 2(4.00) 1(2.00) 49(98.00)a
对照组 50 30(60.00) 8(16.00) 2(4.00) 10(20.00) 40(80.00)
表4 2组患儿术后并发症情况比较[例（%）]
组别 例数 尿潴留 切口感染 阴囊血肿 总发生
试验组 50 1(2.00) 0(0.00) 1(2.00) 2(4.00)
对照组 50 2(4.00) 0(0.00) 2(4.00) 4(8.00)
χ2         4.00
P         0.04
[1]
曲建楠，马迎雪. 综合护理干预在小儿疝气快速康复中的应用效果[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2019, 34(2): 210-211.
[2]
Jessula S, Davies DA. Evidence supporting laparoscopic hernia repair in children[J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2018, 30(3): 405-410.
[3]
Song Y, Hu C, Yan P, et al. Effect of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery principles in the perioperative period of pediatric inguinal hernia[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021, 13(5): 5540-5546.
[4]
吴敏，余丽群，田甜. 整体护理中融入人性化舒适护理理念对手术室整体护理质量的影响[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2019, 48(1): 118-120.
[5]
陈俊，潘海华，胡桔萍. 循证护理干预在小儿疝气手术治疗中的应用效果及术后并发症分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2020, 20(4): 658-660.
[6]
何川，李元海，孙玉红, 等. 七氟烷复合瑞芬太尼麻醉对疝气腹腔镜手术患儿血流动力学影响[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2021, 49(2): 153-154.
[7]
Crellin DJ, Harrison D, Santamaria N, et al. The psychometric properties of the flacc scale used to assess procedural Pain[J]. J Pain, 2018, 19(8): 862-872.
[8]
Liu R, Cao WH, Liu HL, et al. Effects of hydrotherapy with traditional Chinese medicine and magnetotherapy on treatment of scars after healing of deep partial-thickness burn wounds in children[J]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi, 2018, 34(8): 516-521.
[9]
刘芬，魏雅丽，何立勤, 等. 人性化护理干预在小儿疝气行腹腔镜治疗中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2019, 25(10): 58-60.
[10]
Yeap E, Pacilli M, Nataraja RM. Inguinal hernias in children[J]. Aust J Gen Pract, 2020, 49(1-2): 38-43.
[11]
Ho IG, Ihn K, Koo EJ, et al. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia in infants: Comparison with open hernia repair[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2018, 53(10): 2008-2012.
[12]
Dreuning K, Maat S, Twisk J, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pediatric inguinal hernia repair: state-of-the-art comparison and future perspectives from a meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(10): 3177-3191.
[13]
邹靖，李雪清，左育涛. 腹腔镜下小儿疝气高位结扎手术的配合及护理体会[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2017, 28(S2): 266.
[14]
高瑛，梁丽云. 人性化护理在小儿疝气术后疼痛护理中的应用探讨[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2021, 50(22): 3198-3200.
[15]
吴敏，余丽群，田甜. 整体护理中融入人性化舒适护理理念对手术室整体护理质量的影响[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2019, 48(1): 118-120.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号