切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 251 -254. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.02.029

护理论著

全程护理干预对行腹腔镜疝修补术的腹股沟疝患者应用效果
王曦1, 包颖2, 朱秉秋2, 杨威2,()   
  1. 1. 130033 长春,吉林大学中日联谊医院妇科
    2. 130033 长春,吉林大学中日联谊医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-19 出版日期:2022-04-18
  • 通信作者: 杨威

Application effect of whole-course nursing intervention on inguinal hernia patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair

Xi Wang1, Ying Bao2, Bingqiu Zhu2, Wei Yang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology, Jilin University Sino-Japanese Friendship Hospital, Changchun 130033, China
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Jilin University Sino-Japanese Friendship Hospital, Changchun 130033, China
  • Received:2020-02-19 Published:2022-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Wei Yang
引用本文:

王曦, 包颖, 朱秉秋, 杨威. 全程护理干预对行腹腔镜疝修补术的腹股沟疝患者应用效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 251-254.

Xi Wang, Ying Bao, Bingqiu Zhu, Wei Yang. Application effect of whole-course nursing intervention on inguinal hernia patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(02): 251-254.

目的

探讨全程护理干预对行腹腔镜疝修补术的腹股沟疝患者应用效果。

方法

选择2018年3月至2020年5月于吉林大学中日联谊医院接受腹腔镜下疝修补术的腹股沟疝患者80例,按照护理方式不同分为2组,每组患者40例。传统组采用传统护理模式干预,全程组采用全程护理模式干预。并对2组患者的焦虑程度、生活水平以及护理满意度进行比较分析。

结果

全程组术前及麻醉前的焦虑量表评分均显著低于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术前,2组患者的生活水平各维度评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后,全程组躯体健康、心理健康、社会功能、情感状况及精力五个维度得分均显著优于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);全程组护理满意度显著高于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

全程护理干预可有效缓解腹股沟疝患者的焦虑情绪,提高患者的术后生活质量,并且能显著提升患者的护理满意度,值得临床推广应用。

Objective

To explore the effect of whole-course nursing intervention on patients with inguinal hernia who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair.

Methods

A total of 80 patients with inguinal hernia who received laparoscopic hernia repair in China-Japan Friendship Hospital of Jilin University from March 2018 to May 2020 were selected and divided into 2 groups according to different nursing methods, with 40 patients in each group. The traditional group was intervened by the traditional nursing mode, and the whole group was intervened by the whole nursing mode. The anxiety level, living standard and nursing satisfaction of the two groups of patients were compared and analyzed.

Results

The anxiety scale scores of the whole group before operation and before anesthesia were significantly lower than those of the traditional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Significant (P>0.05); after operation, the scores of five dimensions of physical health, mental health, social function, emotional status and energy in the whole group were significantly better than those in the traditional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the whole group nursing The satisfaction was significantly higher than that of the traditional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The whole nursing intervention can effectively relieve the anxiety of patients with inguinal hernia, improve the quality of life of patients after operation, and can significantly improve the nursing satisfaction of patients, which is worthy of clinical application.

表1 生活水平各维度评分对比(±s
表2 2组患者护理满意度比较
[1]
胡趣儿,何海荣,陈胜才, 等. 全程护理干预对腹腔镜下腹股沟疝无张力修补术的应用效果[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2015(12): 185-188.
[2]
孙叶飞,陈晓晨. 腹腔镜下腹股沟嵌顿疝修补术全程护理干预效果[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2020, 49(1): 84-87.
[3]
宋越,彭广福. 腹腔镜手术治疗儿童腹股沟疝25例体会[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2002, 18(9): 957.
[4]
杨亚红,许晓琦. 综合性护理干预在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者中的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2017, 2(32): 69.
[5]
王莹,杜易芳. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术后系统化整体护理效果观察[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2015(11): 1311-1313.
[6]
朱美玉,范月秀,练秀群, 等. 护理干预在腹腔镜下腹膜外腹股沟疝补片植入修补术患者的效果[J]. 中国医药科学, 2017, 7(5): 94-97.
[7]
张锐. 全程护理干预对腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术患者术中应激反应的影响[J]. 河南医学研究, 2020, 29(12): 2291-2292.
[8]
孙叶飞,陈晓晨. 腹腔镜下腹股沟嵌顿疝修补术全程护理干预效果[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2020, 49(1): 84-87.
[9]
黄静. 全程护理干预对急性阑尾炎患者单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中应激反应的影响[J]. 医疗装备, 2019, 32(9): 185-186.
[10]
蓝玉珍. 系统护理干预对腹股沟疝修补术患者的影响[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2014(8): 761-764.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?