切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 509 -511. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.05.016

临床论著

经腹直肌腹膜前无张力修补手术治疗嵌顿性股疝24例
张万宇1,(), 孙海燕2, 黎东伟1, 陈展辉1, 卢强1, 唐世龙1, 李君久1   
  1. 1. 523110 广东东莞,中山大学附属东华医院普外科
    2. 523110 广东东莞,中山大学附属东华医院检验科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-18 出版日期:2021-10-14
  • 通信作者: 张万宇

24 cases of incarcerated femoral hernia treated by preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty through rectus abdominis incision

Wanyu Zhang1,(), Haiyan Sun2, Dongwei Li1, Zhanhui Chen1, qiang Lu1, Shilong Tang1, Junjiu Li1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Tungwah Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Dongguan 523110, China
    2. Clinical laboratory, Tungwah Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Dongguan 523110, China
  • Received:2020-03-18 Published:2021-10-14
  • Corresponding author: Wanyu Zhang
引用本文:

张万宇, 孙海燕, 黎东伟, 陈展辉, 卢强, 唐世龙, 李君久. 经腹直肌腹膜前无张力修补手术治疗嵌顿性股疝24例[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 509-511.

Wanyu Zhang, Haiyan Sun, Dongwei Li, Zhanhui Chen, qiang Lu, Shilong Tang, Junjiu Li. 24 cases of incarcerated femoral hernia treated by preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty through rectus abdominis incision[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(05): 509-511.

目的

探讨经腹直肌入路腹膜前修补手术治疗嵌顿性股疝的经验及疗效。

方法

回顾分析2009年6月至2019年2月,中山大学附属东华医院经腹直肌入路腹膜前修补手术治疗的嵌顿性股疝患者24例。收集患者的基本资料及临床数据。

结果

24例中疝内容物为小肠17例,大网膜7例;绞窄性股疝同时行小肠部分切除术5例,绞窄性股疝同时行大网膜部分切除术治疗1例;手术时间(79.2±30.2)min。24例嵌顿疝内容物复位后均行腹膜前补片修补术,无切口感染者;21例门诊随访2~5年,失访3例,无股疝复发者、无腹股沟区慢性疼痛者、无新发斜疝或直疝者。

结论

经腹直肌入路腹膜前修补手术治疗嵌顿性股疝,操作简便,值得在合适的患者中开展。

Objective

To explore the experience and effect of preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty for incarcerated femoral hernia through rectus abdominis incision.

Methods

From June 2009 to February 2019, 24 patients with incarcerated femoral hernia were treated by preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty through rectus abdominis incision in Tungwah Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. We retrospectively analyzed the baseline and clinical data of these patients.

Results

Of the 24 cases, 17 cases were small intestine incarcerated, 7 cases were greater omentum incarcerated, 5 cases of strangulated femoral hernia were treated with partial resection of small intestine, 1 case of strangulated femoral hernia treated with simultaneous partial resection of greater omentum, the operation time was (79.2±30.2) minutes. 24 cases of incarcerated femoral hernia were treated with preperitoneal mesh repair after reduction, no incision infection, 21 cases were followed up for 2 to 5 years, 3 cases were lost, no femoral hernia recurrence, no chronic post operative inguinal pain, no indirect hernia and direct hernia.

Conclusion

The preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty in incarcerated femoral hernia through rectus abdominis is simple, and it is appropriate for the right patient.

[1]
陈孝平,汪建平,赵继宗. 外科学[M]. 9版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018, 315-316.
[2]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 244-246.
[3]
Kang JS, Qiao F, Nie L, et al. Preperitoneal femoral hernioplasty: an "umbrella" technique[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(5): 805-808.
[4]
Castagnetti M, Rigamonti W. Preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia[J]. BJU Int, 2012, 109(8): 1270-1275.
[5]
Mirilas P, Colbom GL, McClusky DA, et al. The history of anatomy and surgery of the preperitonealspace[J]. Arch Surg, 2005, 140(1): 90-94.
[6]
Yang XF, Liu JL. Anatomy essentials for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2016, 4(19): 372.
[7]
禹仲,周建平,董明. 腹股沟嵌顿疝急诊手术应用补片的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(4): 266-269.
[8]
Yang L, Wang H, Liang X, et al. Bacteria in hernia sac an important risk fact for surgical site infection after incarcerated hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(2): 279-283.
[9]
Wysocki A, Strzałka M, Migaczewski M, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of incarcerated inguinal hernias repaired by Lichtenstein technique[J]. Videosurgery Miniinv, 2014, 9(2): 196-200.
[10]
刘嘉欣,李汝红. 腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛诊疗进展[J]. 医学综述, 2016, 22(17): 3413-3416.
[11]
陈军,王江林. 国际疼痛学会对世界卫生组织ICD-11慢性疼痛分类的修订与系统化分类[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2019, 25(5): 323-330.
[12]
Garofalo F, Motamoya P, Munday A, et al. Total extraperitoneal hernia repair: residency teaching program and outcome evaluation[J]. World J Surg, 2017, 41(1): 1-2.
[13]
陈创造,何小科. 成人腹股沟疝手术治疗的回顾与进展[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2015, 18(4): 334-336.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[3] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[4] 纪凯伦, 郝少龙, 孙海涛, 韩威. 减重术后胆囊结石形成机制的新进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 100-103.
[5] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[6] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[9] 陈航, 闵翔. 日间甲状腺切除术后出血的12例临床分析及应对措施[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 600-602.
[10] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
[11] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[12] 李博, 胡刚, 邱文龙, 汤坚强, 王锡山. 多功能吲哚菁绿近红外荧光血管成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES Ⅳ式)中的应用(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 524-528.
[13] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要