切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 509 -511. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.05.016

临床论著

经腹直肌腹膜前无张力修补手术治疗嵌顿性股疝24例
张万宇1,(), 孙海燕2, 黎东伟1, 陈展辉1, 卢强1, 唐世龙1, 李君久1   
  1. 1. 523110 广东东莞,中山大学附属东华医院普外科
    2. 523110 广东东莞,中山大学附属东华医院检验科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-18 出版日期:2021-10-14
  • 通信作者: 张万宇

24 cases of incarcerated femoral hernia treated by preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty through rectus abdominis incision

Wanyu Zhang1,(), Haiyan Sun2, Dongwei Li1, Zhanhui Chen1, qiang Lu1, Shilong Tang1, Junjiu Li1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Tungwah Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Dongguan 523110, China
    2. Clinical laboratory, Tungwah Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Dongguan 523110, China
  • Received:2020-03-18 Published:2021-10-14
  • Corresponding author: Wanyu Zhang
引用本文:

张万宇, 孙海燕, 黎东伟, 陈展辉, 卢强, 唐世龙, 李君久. 经腹直肌腹膜前无张力修补手术治疗嵌顿性股疝24例[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 509-511.

Wanyu Zhang, Haiyan Sun, Dongwei Li, Zhanhui Chen, qiang Lu, Shilong Tang, Junjiu Li. 24 cases of incarcerated femoral hernia treated by preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty through rectus abdominis incision[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(05): 509-511.

目的

探讨经腹直肌入路腹膜前修补手术治疗嵌顿性股疝的经验及疗效。

方法

回顾分析2009年6月至2019年2月,中山大学附属东华医院经腹直肌入路腹膜前修补手术治疗的嵌顿性股疝患者24例。收集患者的基本资料及临床数据。

结果

24例中疝内容物为小肠17例,大网膜7例;绞窄性股疝同时行小肠部分切除术5例,绞窄性股疝同时行大网膜部分切除术治疗1例;手术时间(79.2±30.2)min。24例嵌顿疝内容物复位后均行腹膜前补片修补术,无切口感染者;21例门诊随访2~5年,失访3例,无股疝复发者、无腹股沟区慢性疼痛者、无新发斜疝或直疝者。

结论

经腹直肌入路腹膜前修补手术治疗嵌顿性股疝,操作简便,值得在合适的患者中开展。

Objective

To explore the experience and effect of preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty for incarcerated femoral hernia through rectus abdominis incision.

Methods

From June 2009 to February 2019, 24 patients with incarcerated femoral hernia were treated by preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty through rectus abdominis incision in Tungwah Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. We retrospectively analyzed the baseline and clinical data of these patients.

Results

Of the 24 cases, 17 cases were small intestine incarcerated, 7 cases were greater omentum incarcerated, 5 cases of strangulated femoral hernia were treated with partial resection of small intestine, 1 case of strangulated femoral hernia treated with simultaneous partial resection of greater omentum, the operation time was (79.2±30.2) minutes. 24 cases of incarcerated femoral hernia were treated with preperitoneal mesh repair after reduction, no incision infection, 21 cases were followed up for 2 to 5 years, 3 cases were lost, no femoral hernia recurrence, no chronic post operative inguinal pain, no indirect hernia and direct hernia.

Conclusion

The preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty in incarcerated femoral hernia through rectus abdominis is simple, and it is appropriate for the right patient.

[1]
陈孝平,汪建平,赵继宗. 外科学[M]. 9版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018, 315-316.
[2]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 244-246.
[3]
Kang JS, Qiao F, Nie L, et al. Preperitoneal femoral hernioplasty: an "umbrella" technique[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(5): 805-808.
[4]
Castagnetti M, Rigamonti W. Preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia[J]. BJU Int, 2012, 109(8): 1270-1275.
[5]
Mirilas P, Colbom GL, McClusky DA, et al. The history of anatomy and surgery of the preperitonealspace[J]. Arch Surg, 2005, 140(1): 90-94.
[6]
Yang XF, Liu JL. Anatomy essentials for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2016, 4(19): 372.
[7]
禹仲,周建平,董明. 腹股沟嵌顿疝急诊手术应用补片的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(4): 266-269.
[8]
Yang L, Wang H, Liang X, et al. Bacteria in hernia sac an important risk fact for surgical site infection after incarcerated hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(2): 279-283.
[9]
Wysocki A, Strzałka M, Migaczewski M, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of incarcerated inguinal hernias repaired by Lichtenstein technique[J]. Videosurgery Miniinv, 2014, 9(2): 196-200.
[10]
刘嘉欣,李汝红. 腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛诊疗进展[J]. 医学综述, 2016, 22(17): 3413-3416.
[11]
陈军,王江林. 国际疼痛学会对世界卫生组织ICD-11慢性疼痛分类的修订与系统化分类[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2019, 25(5): 323-330.
[12]
Garofalo F, Motamoya P, Munday A, et al. Total extraperitoneal hernia repair: residency teaching program and outcome evaluation[J]. World J Surg, 2017, 41(1): 1-2.
[13]
陈创造,何小科. 成人腹股沟疝手术治疗的回顾与进展[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2015, 18(4): 334-336.
[1] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 孙一娇, 包润发, 董平, 束翌俊. PBL结合手术视频剪辑教学在普通外科专科医师规范化培训中的应用与思考[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 96-99.
[9] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[10] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[11] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[12] 吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.
[13] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[14] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[15] 张耕毓, 唐冲, 张昆, 张辉, 张清华, 刘家帮. 股骨头坏死髓芯减压术的文献计量学分析及单中心病例报道[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 771-780.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?