切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 485 -488. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.05.010

临床论著

腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术对切口疝患者的临床疗效及胃肠功能的影响
孟培1,(), 戴平1, 邵志鸿1   
  1. 1. 200940 上海市宝山区吴淞中心医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-23 出版日期:2021-10-14
  • 通信作者: 孟培
  • 基金资助:
    上海市宝山区科学技术委员会科研项目(12-E-14)

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in patients with incisional hernia and the effect on gastrointestinal function

Pei Meng1,(), Ping Dai1, Zhihong Shao1   

  1. 1. Medical and General Surgery Department of Wusong Center, Baoshan District, Shanghai 200940, China
  • Received:2020-12-23 Published:2021-10-14
  • Corresponding author: Pei Meng
引用本文:

孟培, 戴平, 邵志鸿. 腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术对切口疝患者的临床疗效及胃肠功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 485-488.

Pei Meng, Ping Dai, Zhihong Shao. Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in patients with incisional hernia and the effect on gastrointestinal function[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(05): 485-488.

目的

探讨腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术对切口疝患者的临床疗效及对其胃肠功能的影响。

方法

选取上海市宝山区吴淞中心医院2016年11月至2019年10月收治的68例腹壁切口疝患者。将所有患者按手术方式分为腹腔镜组(34例)和开放组(34例)。开放组行开放腹壁疝修补手术,腹腔镜组行腹腔镜疝修补术。记录并比较2组患者术中及术后恢复指标、胃肠功能指标及术后并发症发生率。

结果

腹腔镜组术中出血量明显少于开放组,腹腔镜组切口愈合时间、下床活动时间、住院时间均明显短于开放组,腹腔镜组住院费用明显高于开放组,腹腔镜组胃肠功能指标(首次进食时间、首次肠鸣音时间、首次肛门排气时间、首次排便时间)均明显短于开放组,腹腔镜组的术后并发症发生率明显低于开放组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术治疗切口疝患者临床疗效显著,与开放手术相比,术中出血量小,术后恢复快,术后并发症发生率低,且能有效促进患者胃肠功能恢复,但治疗费用相对较高。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) on patients with incisional hernia and its effect on their gastrointestinal function.

Methods

Sixty-eight patients with incisional hernia of the abdominal wall admitted to our general surgery department from November 2016 to October 2019 were selected. All patients were divided into a laparoscopic group (34 cases) and an open group (34 cases) according to the surgical method. The open group underwent open repair procedure, and the laparoscopic group underwent laparoscopic hernia repair. Intraoperative data, postoperative recovery data, postoperative gastrointestinal function data and postoperative complication rates were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.

Results

Intraoperative bleeding was significantly less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (P<0.05). The incision healing time, time to get out of bed and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (P<0.05); the hospital cost was significantly higher in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (P<0.05). Gastrointestinal function indexes (first feeding time, first bowel sound time, first anal exhaust time, first defecation time) in laparoscopic group were significantly shorter than those in open group (P<0.05); the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is clinically effective in treating patients with incisional hernia, with less intraoperative bleeding, faster postoperative recovery, and lower postoperative complication rate than traditional open surgery, and it can effectively promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function of patients, but the cost of treatment is relatively high.

表1 2组术中指标比较(±s
表2 2组患者术后指标比较(±s
表3 2组术后胃肠功能指标比较(h,±s
表4 2组患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
[1]
唐健雄,黄磊,李绍杰, 等. 我国疝和腹壁外科前景展望[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2017, 55(1): 15-19.
[2]
谢颂状. 腹壁切口疝发病诱因与治疗研究进展[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2016, 30(10): 946-949.
[3]
李骥宇,崔明,朱俊, 等. 腹壁切口疝的治疗进展[J]. 西南国防医药, 2018, 28(8): 797-798.
[4]
李健文,乐飞.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术在青年患者中的应用特点[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018,17(11):1080-1082.
[5]
杨日玲,林雅萱,孙桂英. 采用腹腔镜腹膜前补片植入法进行腹股沟疝修补术的护理[J]. 世界中医药, 2016, 11(3): 886-887.
[6]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 腹壁切口疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 241-243.
[7]
黄鹤光,林荣贵. 腹壁疝的规范化治疗[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2018, 25(12): 1413-1415.
[8]
唐健雄,李绍杰. 我国疝与腹壁外科发展和在新世纪创新挑战[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(1): 89-92.
[9]
陈大伟. 腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术SAGES指南[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2017, 11(17): 9-12.
[10]
唐健雄. 疝和腹壁外科微创手术新认识[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(11): 1145-1149.
[11]
杨清羽,张贤坤,贺春燕, 等. 腹腔镜与开放手术治疗腹壁切口疝的对比研究[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2015, 23(20): 2997-3000.
[12]
艾力江·吾斯满. 腹部手术后胃肠功能紊乱的研究现状[J]. 中国医药, 2016, 4(11): 618-621.
[13]
秦胜旗,张忠涛,王国军, 等. 快速康复外科对腹腔镜结肠癌根治术后胃肠功能恢复的影响研究[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(1): 14-17.
[14]
潘茂恩,黄鹤光,陈燕昌,等.腹腔镜经腹部分腹膜前修补术治疗下腹边缘疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019,18(11):1037-1042.
[15]
王占宝,董昕,杨光, 等. 腹腔镜修补术治疗成人腹壁疝的疗效及对胃肠功能的影响[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2019, 32(6): 856-857.
[16]
李健文,乐飞. 腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术并发症演变及防治[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(7): 761-764.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要