切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 333 -336. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.04.005

临床论著

硅胶子宫托佩戴患者阴道微生态的特征分析
王宏1,(), 肖梅珠1, 时晓1, 王素美1   
  1. 1. 100020 北京,首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-06 出版日期:2021-08-18
  • 通信作者: 王宏

Analysis of characteristics of vaginal microecology in female pelvic organ prolapse using pessary

Hong Wang1,(), Meizhu Xiao1, Xiao Shi1, Sumei Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
  • Received:2021-02-06 Published:2021-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Hong Wang
引用本文:

王宏, 肖梅珠, 时晓, 王素美. 硅胶子宫托佩戴患者阴道微生态的特征分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 333-336.

Hong Wang, Meizhu Xiao, Xiao Shi, Sumei Wang. Analysis of characteristics of vaginal microecology in female pelvic organ prolapse using pessary[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(04): 333-336.

目的

探讨应用硅胶子宫托治疗子宫脱垂患者的阴道微生态特征,从微生态角度对提高子宫托持续佩戴成功率给予指导,为子宫托保守治疗更换频率提供客观依据。

方法

收集2018年12月至2020年12月就诊于首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院妇科门诊子宫脱垂佩戴环形带膜子宫托治疗女性43例,在佩戴子宫托之前、佩戴后2周及3个月采集阴道分泌物行阴道微生态检测,分析持续佩戴不同时间段其阴道微生态的总体特征,对佩戴子宫托前及佩戴2周及3个月后患者生活质量问卷评分进行比较。

结果

阴道微生态检测中,佩戴子宫托后患者不同时间段均存在不同程度的微生态失衡,佩戴2周阴道菌群密集度高于佩戴前及佩戴后3个月组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);佩戴子宫托2周组菌群抑制率明显高于佩戴前及佩戴后3个月组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。佩戴子宫托2周组阴道pH值高于佩戴前及佩戴后3个月组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。佩戴子宫托后各时间点盆底功能影响的问卷—简表7和盆底困扰量表简表-20问卷评分均显著下降,与治疗前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

阴道微生态在佩戴子宫托2周左右发生明显改变,易出现菌群失调,易导致阴道炎,但随着佩戴时间延长,阴道微环境调整逐渐恢复至佩戴前状态,持续佩戴3个月环形子宫托可用于子宫脱垂的保守治疗。

Objective

To explore vaginal microecological characteristics of female pelvic organ prolapse using silicone pessary, and to provide guidance for improving the success rate of continuous wearing of pessary from the perspective of microecology, and to provide objective basis for the replacement frequency of conservative treatment of pessary.

Methods

A total of 43 women who were treated with a ring silicone membrane pessary for uterine prolapse in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from December 2018 to December 2020 were collected. Vaginal secretions were collected for testing vaginal microecology, before wearing the pessary, at 2 weeks and 3 months after wearing the pessary, and the overall characteristics of vaginal microecology for women who continuous wearing the pessary at different time periods were analyzed. The quality of life questionnaire scores were compared before and after 2 weeks and 3 months of using silicone pessary.

Results

There were different degrees of microecological imbalance in the patients after wearing the pessary at different time. The concentration of vaginal flora at 2 weeks after wearing the pessary was higher than that before wearing and at 3 months after wearing the pessary, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The microflora inhibition rate in the group wearing pessary for 2 weeks was significantly higher than that in the group before and at 3 months after wearing pessary, but there was no statistical significance (P>0.05). Vaginal pH value of the group wearing pessary for 2 weeks was higher than that of the group before and 3 months after wearing pessary, but there was no statistical significance (P>0.05). PFIQ-7 and PFDI-20 scores were significantly decreased at 2 weeks and 3 months after wearing pessary, and the differences were statistically significant compared with those before treatment (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Vaginal microecology changed significantly about 2 weeks after wearing the pessary, which was prone to maladjustment of bacterial flora and vaginitis. However, with the extension of wearing time, the adjustment of vaginal microenvironment gradually recovered to the state before wearing. The continuous wearing of a ring pessary for 3 months could be used for conservative treatment of uterine prolapse.

表1 43例佩戴环形子宫托患者治疗前后不同时间阴道微生态比较(例)
表2 43例佩戴子宫托患者前后各时间点生活质量评分比较(±s
[8]
Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2011, 108(Suppl1): 4680-6487.
[9]
Sarma S, Ying T, Moore KH. B. Long-term vaginal ring pessary use: discontinuation rates and adverse events[J]. BJOG, 2009, 116(13): 1715-1721.
[10]
Grimes CL, Balk EM, Crisp CC, et al. A guide for urogynecologic patient care utilizing telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: review of existing evidence[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2020, 31(6): 1063-1089.
[11]
Yoshimura K, Morotomi N, Fukuda K, et al. Effects of pelvic organ prolapse ring pessary therapy on intravaginal microbial flora[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27(2): 219-227.
[12]
Miceli A, Fernández-Sánchez M, Dueñas-Díez JL. How often should ring pessaries be removed or changed in women with advanced POP? A prospective observational study[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2021, 32(6): 1471-1478.
[13]
Sturdee DW, Panay N. Recommendations for the management of postmenopausal vaginal atrophy[J]. Climacteric, 2010, 13(6): 509-522.
[1]
Swift SE. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 183(2): 277-285.
[2]
Richter HE, Burgio KL, Brubaker L et al. Continence pessary compared with behavioral therapy or combined therapy for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 115(3): 609-617.
[3]
de Albuquerque Coelho SC, de Castro EB, Juliato CR. Female pelvic organ prolapse using pessaries: systematic review[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27(12): 1797-1803.
[4]
Weber AM, Richter HE. Pelvic organ prolapse[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 106(3): 615-634.
[5]
Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders(PFDI-20) and PFIQ-7)[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 193(1): 103-113.
[6]
Giannini A, Russo E, Cano A, et al. Current management of pelvic organ prolapse in aging women: EMAS clinical guide[J]. Maturitas, 2018, 110(4): 118-123.
[7]
Collins S, Beigi R, Mellen C, et al. The effect of pessaries on the vaginal microenvironment[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 212(1): 60. e1-6.
[1] 朱霞, 高艳多, 许彩, 唐婉, 谢磊, 葛倩, 陈芬芳, 赵胜. 盆底三维超声评价产次及分娩方式对肛提肌裂孔面积的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 920-925.
[2] 刘丽, 刘静华, 蒋莹, 郑洪平, 林李梅, 宋金爽, 徐烨. 经会阴三维超声断层成像评估盆腔器官脱垂患者肛提肌损伤的康复疗效[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(01): 54-60.
[3] 赵春桃, 梁峰雪, 杨瑞敏, 陈云璇, 陈曦, 焦桂清. 三维盆底超声预测产妇发生盆腔脏器脱垂的价值及影响因素[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 606-614.
[4] 周芳芳, 史娜娜. 妊娠期糖尿病孕妇阴道微生态变化及其对妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(06): 714-719.
[5] 徐婷婷, 周芷伊, 刘娜, 邓春燕, 黄桂琼, 王晓东, 余海燕. 中孕期使用子宫颈托对双胎妊娠孕妇早产预防的系统评价[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(03): 253-261.
[6] 陈递林, 宋振坤, 李明娥. 盆腔器官脱垂患者肛肠动力学改变的临床研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(05): 525-529.
[7] 董洁晨, 金海红, 龚姗, 李苗, 高淑蕊, 韩惠萍. 生物反馈电刺激联合药物在绝经后盆腔器官脱垂盆底重建术后应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 60-64.
[8] 王素美, 杜非凡, 鲁奇, 王宏. 改良阴道全封闭伴子宫切除术治疗高龄女性重度全盆底缺陷器官脱垂的安全性评估[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 329-332.
[9] 刘娟, 肖媛月, 王倩青, 关振堃, 关小明. 盆腔器官脱垂手术新入路:机器人辅助经阴道腹腔镜阴道骶骨固定术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 168-171.
[10] 张庆霞, 阳艳军, 王扬, 梁静, 凌斌, 陈庆云. 腹腔镜线性单侧髂耻韧带悬吊术治疗中盆腔器官脱垂[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(06): 362-366.
[11] 赵成志, 卢深涛, 王荥, 刘明博, 孙玉菡, 雷丽, 刘禄斌. 腹腔镜骶骨固定术相关并发症的回顾:7年单中心临床分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(04): 223-228.
[12] 赵文娟, 李斌, 孔佳. 腹腔镜子宫骶骨固定术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(01): 0-0.
[13] 赵文娟, 李斌, 孔佳. 腹腔镜阴道骶骨固定术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(01): 0-0.
[14] 赵文娟, 李斌, 孔佳. 腹腔镜阴道骶骨固定术治疗女性盆腔器官脱垂的40例分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(01): 41-45.
[15] 魏璇, 陈雨柔, 易跃雄, 熊瑶, 张蔚. 单孔腹腔镜与阴式骶棘韧带悬吊术治疗盆腔器官脱垂效果分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(06): 351-355.
阅读次数
全文


摘要