切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 154 -157. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.02.009

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

脱细胞基质材料生物补片在腹腔镜切口疝修补术中的应用研究
薛意恒1, 孟岩2, 孙少川1, 孙中伟1,()   
  1. 1. 250013 山东大学附属济南市中心医院胃肠一外科
    2. 250013 山东大学附属济南市中心医院手术室
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-01 出版日期:2021-04-18
  • 通信作者: 孙中伟

Study on use of biological patch in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (IPOM procedure)

Yiheng Xue1, Yan Meng2, Shaochuan Sun1, Zhongwei Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Department Gastrointestinal Surgery, Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated Shandong University, Jinan 250013, China
    2. Operation Room, Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated Shandong University, Jinan 250013, China
  • Received:2020-07-01 Published:2021-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Zhongwei Sun
引用本文:

薛意恒, 孟岩, 孙少川, 孙中伟. 脱细胞基质材料生物补片在腹腔镜切口疝修补术中的应用研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 154-157.

Yiheng Xue, Yan Meng, Shaochuan Sun, Zhongwei Sun. Study on use of biological patch in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (IPOM procedure)[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 154-157.

目的

探讨脱细胞基质材料生物补片在腹腔镜切口疝修补术临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2014年2月至2020年1月,山东大学附属济南市中心医院84例小切口疝修补手术患者的临床资料。其中使用生物补片患者45例,使用合成防黏连补片患者39例。对照分析2组的疗效和并发症等的差异。

结果

2组患者在术后住院天数、手术时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后并发症方面,在随访的日期内,均无复发患者,合成补片组术后肺栓塞1例,2组术后补片感染、慢性疼痛、并发症的Clavien-Dindo分级Ⅱ级及以上病例,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

脱细胞基质材料生物补片在小切口疝的治疗中,是安全、有效的。

Objective

To explore the application effect of acellular tissue matrix patch (biological patch) in incisional hernia repair.

Methods

Retrospectively analyzed the data of 84 patients with small incisional hernia repair from February 2014 to January 2020 in Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated Shandong University. Then compared the efficacy and complications between biological patch (n=45) and anti-adhesive synthetic mesh (n=39) in incisional hernia repair.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital stay and operating time (P>0.05). No recurrent patients within the follow-up date. One case of pulmonary embolism after operation occurred in synthetic mesh group. There were no statistically significant differences in mesh infection, chronic pain andClavien-Dindograde>II complications (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Biological patch could be safely and effectively used to repair the incisional hernia.

表1 2组患者临床资料分析
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 腹壁切口疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 241-243.
[2]
Turner Patricia L, Park Adrian E. Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernias: pros and cons[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2008, 88(1): 85-100.
[3]
李亮,安伟德. 腹腔镜与开放手术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(1): 60-63.
[4]
LeBlanc KA, Booth WV. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1993, 3(1): 39-41.
[5]
姚琪远. 腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术在国内开展的现状及应用前景[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2010, 10(2): 103-106.
[6]
Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endoherniasociety (IEHS)-part1[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(1): 2-29.
[7]
唐健雄,郑民华. 切口疝腹腔镜手术的规范化操作专家共识[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(1): 1-7.
[8]
Tandon A, Pathak S, Lyons NJR, et al. Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventralhernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2016, 103(12): 1598-1607.
[9]
Shankaran V, Weber DJ, Reed RL 2nd, et al. A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 253(1): 16-26.
[10]
Witt PD, ChengCJ, MallorySB, et al. Surgical treatment of pseudosyndactyly of the hand in epidermolysisbullosa: histological analysis of an acellular allograft dermal matrix[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 1999, 43(4): 379-385.
[11]
Wong AK, Schonmeyr B, Singh P, et al. Histologic analysis ofangiogenesis and lymphangio genesis in acellular human dermis[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2008, 121(4): 1144-1152.
[12]
Itani Kamal M F, RosenMichael, VargoDaniel, et al. Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH Study[J]. Surgery, 2012, 152(3): 498-505.
[13]
Kurmann A, Visth E, Candinas D et al. Long-term follow-up of open and laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias[J]. World J Surg, 2011, 35(2): 297-301.
[14]
Alfieri S, Amid PK, Izard G, et al. International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operativechronic painfollowing inguinal hernia surgery[J]. Hernia, 2011, 15(3): 239-249.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[11] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[12] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[13] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[14] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[15] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
阅读次数
全文


摘要