切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 154 -157. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.02.009

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

脱细胞基质材料生物补片在腹腔镜切口疝修补术中的应用研究
薛意恒1, 孟岩2, 孙少川1, 孙中伟1,()   
  1. 1. 250013 山东大学附属济南市中心医院胃肠一外科
    2. 250013 山东大学附属济南市中心医院手术室
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-01 出版日期:2021-04-18
  • 通信作者: 孙中伟

Study on use of biological patch in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (IPOM procedure)

Yiheng Xue1, Yan Meng2, Shaochuan Sun1, Zhongwei Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Department Gastrointestinal Surgery, Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated Shandong University, Jinan 250013, China
    2. Operation Room, Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated Shandong University, Jinan 250013, China
  • Received:2020-07-01 Published:2021-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Zhongwei Sun
引用本文:

薛意恒, 孟岩, 孙少川, 孙中伟. 脱细胞基质材料生物补片在腹腔镜切口疝修补术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 154-157.

Yiheng Xue, Yan Meng, Shaochuan Sun, Zhongwei Sun. Study on use of biological patch in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (IPOM procedure)[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 154-157.

目的

探讨脱细胞基质材料生物补片在腹腔镜切口疝修补术临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2014年2月至2020年1月,山东大学附属济南市中心医院84例小切口疝修补手术患者的临床资料。其中使用生物补片患者45例,使用合成防黏连补片患者39例。对照分析2组的疗效和并发症等的差异。

结果

2组患者在术后住院天数、手术时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后并发症方面,在随访的日期内,均无复发患者,合成补片组术后肺栓塞1例,2组术后补片感染、慢性疼痛、并发症的Clavien-Dindo分级Ⅱ级及以上病例,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

脱细胞基质材料生物补片在小切口疝的治疗中,是安全、有效的。

Objective

To explore the application effect of acellular tissue matrix patch (biological patch) in incisional hernia repair.

Methods

Retrospectively analyzed the data of 84 patients with small incisional hernia repair from February 2014 to January 2020 in Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated Shandong University. Then compared the efficacy and complications between biological patch (n=45) and anti-adhesive synthetic mesh (n=39) in incisional hernia repair.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital stay and operating time (P>0.05). No recurrent patients within the follow-up date. One case of pulmonary embolism after operation occurred in synthetic mesh group. There were no statistically significant differences in mesh infection, chronic pain andClavien-Dindograde>II complications (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Biological patch could be safely and effectively used to repair the incisional hernia.

表1 2组患者临床资料分析
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 腹壁切口疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 241-243.
[2]
Turner Patricia L, Park Adrian E. Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernias: pros and cons[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2008, 88(1): 85-100.
[3]
李亮,安伟德. 腹腔镜与开放手术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(1): 60-63.
[4]
LeBlanc KA, Booth WV. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1993, 3(1): 39-41.
[5]
姚琪远. 腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术在国内开展的现状及应用前景[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2010, 10(2): 103-106.
[6]
Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endoherniasociety (IEHS)-part1[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(1): 2-29.
[7]
唐健雄,郑民华. 切口疝腹腔镜手术的规范化操作专家共识[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(1): 1-7.
[8]
Tandon A, Pathak S, Lyons NJR, et al. Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventralhernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2016, 103(12): 1598-1607.
[9]
Shankaran V, Weber DJ, Reed RL 2nd, et al. A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 253(1): 16-26.
[10]
Witt PD, ChengCJ, MallorySB, et al. Surgical treatment of pseudosyndactyly of the hand in epidermolysisbullosa: histological analysis of an acellular allograft dermal matrix[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 1999, 43(4): 379-385.
[11]
Wong AK, Schonmeyr B, Singh P, et al. Histologic analysis ofangiogenesis and lymphangio genesis in acellular human dermis[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2008, 121(4): 1144-1152.
[12]
Itani Kamal M F, RosenMichael, VargoDaniel, et al. Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH Study[J]. Surgery, 2012, 152(3): 498-505.
[13]
Kurmann A, Visth E, Candinas D et al. Long-term follow-up of open and laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias[J]. World J Surg, 2011, 35(2): 297-301.
[14]
Alfieri S, Amid PK, Izard G, et al. International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operativechronic painfollowing inguinal hernia surgery[J]. Hernia, 2011, 15(3): 239-249.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?