切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 61 -64. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.01.015

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

局部神经阻滞麻醉对腹股沟无张力疝修补镇痛效果及应激反应影响的前瞻性随机对照研究
林丽1,(), 潘在礼1, 黄良诚1, 甘昌材1   
  1. 1. 571300 海南省,文昌市人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-22 出版日期:2021-02-18
  • 通信作者: 林丽

Analgesic effect and stress response of inguinal tension-free inguinal hernia repair under local nerve block anesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled study

Li Lin1,(), Zaili Pan1, Liangcheng Huang1, Changcai Gan1   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Wenchang People's Hospital, Wenchang 571300, China
  • Received:2019-12-22 Published:2021-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Li Lin
引用本文:

林丽, 潘在礼, 黄良诚, 甘昌材. 局部神经阻滞麻醉对腹股沟无张力疝修补镇痛效果及应激反应影响的前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 61-64.

Li Lin, Zaili Pan, Liangcheng Huang, Changcai Gan. Analgesic effect and stress response of inguinal tension-free inguinal hernia repair under local nerve block anesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled study[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 61-64.

目的

对比局部神经阻滞麻醉与硬膜外麻醉在无张力疝修补手术中镇痛效果及应激反应的影响。

方法

选取文昌市人民医院2018年6月至2019年6月诊治120例腹股沟疝患者资料。按随机数表法将所有患者分为对照组和研究组,各60例。给予对照组患者硬膜外阻滞麻醉,给予研究组患者局部神经阻滞麻醉。记录2组患者的卧床时间、住院时间、术后疼痛评分、应激反应指标、并发症等情况。

结果

研究组卧床时间、住院时间较对照组明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者的术后疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组白介素-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α与C反应蛋白等应激指标较对照组明显降低,差异无统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组围手术期尿潴留、呕吐恶心发生率与对照组相比明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者的复发率、感染率、慢性疼痛发生率,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹股沟无张力疝修补手术局部神经阻滞麻醉与硬膜外麻醉效果相当,但能缩短住院时间和术后卧床时间,对机体应激反应的影响较小,围手术期并发症发生率低。

Objective

To compare the analgesic effect and stress response of local nerve block anesthesia and epidural anesthesia in tension-free hernia repair.

Methods

The clinical data of 120 patients with inguinal hernia diagnosed and treated in Wenchang People's Hospital from June 2018 to June 2019 were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the random number table. The control group (n=60) was given epidural block anesthesia, and the study group (n=60) was given local nerve block anesthesia. The operative related indicators, postoperative pain score, stress response indicators and complications were analyzed in both groups.

Results

The bed time and hospital stay in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain score between the two groups (P>0.05). Stress indexes such as IL-6, TNF-A and CRP in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of perioperative urinary retention, vomiting and nausea in the study group was significantly reduced compared with the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in recurrence rate, infection rate or incidence of chronic pain between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Local nerve block anesthesia for inguinal tension-free inguinal hernia repair has the same effect as epidural anesthesia, but it can shorten the hospital stay and postoperative bed time, and it has less influence on the stress response of the body and lower perioperative complication rate.

表1 2组临床手术相关指标(±s
表2 2组应激反应指标(±s
表3 2组并发症情况[例(%)]
[1]
王展. 七氟醚吸入麻醉与瑞芬太尼静脉麻醉对无张力疝修补术老年患者应激的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(6): 549-552.
[2]
吴立胜,余建伟,李煜. 复发腹股沟疝手术方式的选择及临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(11): 1043-1047.
[3]
Ioannis B, George T, Chamaidi S, et al. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair under regional anesthesia: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Surg Endos, 2018, 32(5): 2184-2192.
[4]
武振,崔兆清,王永坤, 等. 超声引导下局部神经阻滞治疗老年腹股沟疝[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 300-303.
[5]
潘茂恩,黄鹤光,陈燕昌, 等. 腹腔镜经腹部分腹膜前修补术治疗下腹边缘疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(11): 1037-1042.
[6]
Yoshihara M, Mishina T, Hiramatsu K, et al. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam as a sedation agent with local anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair: randomized controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(3): 471-478.
[7]
董天雄,余壮明. TAPP和Kugel术式治疗成人腹股沟疝的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(5): 485-488.
[8]
朱琳琳,徐伟珏,刘江斌, 等. 儿童腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术与传统疝囊高位结扎术的疗效对比分析[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2019, 40(2): 122-126.
[9]
Hernandez MA, Palazzi L, Lapalma J, et al. Erector spinae plane block for inguinal hernia repair in preterm infants[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2018, 28(3): 298-299.
[10]
律峰,闵苏,黎平, 等. 腰方肌阻滞用于老年患者单侧腹股沟斜疝修补术的效果[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2019, 39(3): 369-372.
[11]
邹敏,李朝玉. 老年腹股沟嵌顿疝全身麻醉腹腔镜手术对认知功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 350-353.
[12]
王效德,潘阳阳,乔南南, 等. 腹横平面联合髂腹下-髂腹股沟神经阻滞麻醉在老年高危患者腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2018, 5(2): 32-36.
[13]
El-Feky E, Abd El A, Caudal A, et al. Ultrasound-guided inguinal field block, ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block as an adjuvant to general anesthesia in unilateral inguinal hernia repair in pediatrics: a comparative study[J]. Res Opin Anesth Intensive Care, 2018, 5(3): 213-219.
[14]
陈建新,李瑞平,李力波. 帕瑞昔布结合切口局麻用于腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛的临床研究[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2018, 33(6): 505-507.
[15]
陈继安,靳小建,陈永军, 等. 成人腹股沟嵌顿疝治疗新进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 249-251.
[16]
王曦滔,黄耿文,申鼎成, 等. 复发性腹股沟疝的手术策略及近期疗效[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(7): 761-765.
[17]
Morrison J. A case for open inguinal hernia repair[J]. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg, 2018, 1(3): 69-73.
[18]
魏鹏,桂煜,高彬, 等. 右美托咪定混合罗哌卡因行腹横肌平面阻滞用于小儿术后镇痛的效果[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2018, 38(6): 684-686.
[19]
张稳,沈湛,刘文生. 微小切口局麻下腹股沟无张力疝修补日间手术124例体会[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(5): 375-377.
[20]
王银合,王志. 腹膜前网塞加平片无张力疝修补术治疗股疝的围手术期处理及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(5): 348-350.
[21]
李义亮,王志,克力木, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片植入术与Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效对比研究[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(8): 928-931.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[9] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[10] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[11] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[12] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[13] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[14] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[15] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
阅读次数
全文


摘要