切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 27 -30. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.01.007

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

"栓套"引线法在腹腔镜切口疝修补术补片固定中的应用
钱振渊1, 牟一平1,()   
  1. 1. 310014 杭州,浙江省人民医院胃肠胰外科·浙江省人民医院疝和腹壁外科中心·杭州医学院附属人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-28 出版日期:2021-02-18
  • 通信作者: 牟一平

Application of "a special noose" to catch suture in laparoscopic incisional hernia patch fixation

Zhenyuan Qian1, Yiping Mou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Center of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of HangZhou Medical College Hangzhou, Hangzhou 310014, China
  • Received:2019-12-28 Published:2021-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Yiping Mou
引用本文:

钱振渊, 牟一平. "栓套"引线法在腹腔镜切口疝修补术补片固定中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 27-30.

Zhenyuan Qian, Yiping Mou. Application of "a special noose" to catch suture in laparoscopic incisional hernia patch fixation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 27-30.

目的

介绍一种腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术中补片悬吊固定的简易和有效的方法。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年8月,浙江省人民医院采用"栓套"引线的方法固定补片的17例腹腔镜切口疝修补术病例的临床资料,统计悬吊固定时间、悬吊针数、皮肤渗血针孔数、"栓套"线更换次数、术后疼痛情况及术后住院时间,评价该方法的操作可行性及临床治疗效果。

结果

17例患者均顺利完成腹腔镜下操作,补片悬吊固定时间45~82 min,平均61.3 min;悬吊针数14~28针;皮肤渗血针孔数0~3个;"栓套"线更换0~2根;术后疼痛评分1~4分;术后住院时间2~6 d。术后未出现补片感染、移位、肠瘘、腹腔室间隔综合征等严重并发症,随访1~20个月,平均13个月,未出现切口疝复发。

结论

"栓套"引线法在腹腔镜切口疝修补术中十分简单,学习曲线短,操作时间稳定,不依赖于腔镜下特殊引线器具,不需用钉枪,经济适用,术后补片固定引起的相关并发症少。

Objective

To introduce a simple and effective method of mesh suspension fixation in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.

Methods

From January 2017 to August 2018, 17 cases of laparoscopic incisional herniorrhaphy with patch fixed by "a special noose" to catch suture were retrospectively analyzed. The time of suspension fixation, the number of suspension needles, the number of pinholes in bleeding, the number of changes of suture in "noose" , postoperative pain and hospitalization time were counted. The feasibility and clinical effect of the method were evaluated.

Results

All the 17 patients successfully completed laparoscopic operation. Patch suspension fixation time was 45 to 82 minutes, with an average of 61.3 minutes; suspension needles number was 14 to 28; the number of bleeding was 0 to 3 pinholes; "noose" suture changes number was 0 to 2; postoperative pain score was 1 to 4 points; postoperative hospital stay was 2 to 6 days. No serious complications such as patch infection, displacement, intestinal fistula, abdominal compartment syndrome occurred after operation. Follow-up period ranged from 1 to 20 months, with an average of 13 months. No recurrence of incisional hernia occurred.

Conclusion

The method of using "a special noose" to catch suture is very simple and easy in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair, with short learning curve and stable operation time. It does not depend on special laparoscopic apparatus or tacks to achieve the suture. It is thought to be an economic application. Also, there are few postoperative complications caused by patch fixation.

图6 在腹腔内观察补片的贴合严密程度
图7 17例患者疼痛评分
[1]
Raakow J, Schulte-Mäter J, Callister Y, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of subxiphoid incisional hernias[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(6): 1083-1088.
[2]
Warren JA, Love M. Incisional hernia repair: minimally invasive approaches[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2018, 98(3): 537-559.
[3]
Al Chalabi H, Larkin J, Mehigan B, et al. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open abdominal incisional hernia repair, with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Int J Surg, 2015, 20: 65-74.
[4]
Bittner R, Bain K, Bansal VK, et al. Update of guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias[International Endohernia Society(IEHS)]-Part A[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(10): 3069-3139.
[5]
Bellows CF, Berger DH. Infiltration of suture sites with local anesthesia for management of pain following laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs: a prospective randomized trial[J]. JSLS, 2006, 10(3): 345-350.
[6]
Kirchhoff P, Hoffmann H, Köckerling F, et al. Is antibiotic prophylaxis mandatory in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair? Data from the herniamed registry[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 58: 31-36.
[7]
Hernández-Granados P, López-Cano M, Morales-Conde S, et al. Incisional hernia prevention and use of mesh. A narrative review[J]. Cir Esp, 2018, 96(2): 76-87.
[8]
Sánchez LJ, Piccoli M, Ferrari CG, et al. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: results of a two thousand patients prospective multicentric database[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 51: 31-38.
[9]
Tam KW, Liang HH, Chai CY. Outcomes of staple fixation of mesh versus nonfixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. World J Surg, 2010, 34(12): 3065-3074.
[10]
宋健. 腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(2): 124-126.
[11]
李巍,董晓彤,张学军, 等. 腹壁切口疝IPOM法修补18例分析[J]. 中国误诊学杂志, 2010, 10(3): 697-698.
[12]
陆景锋,苏畅,肖立俊, 等. 腹腔镜腹腔内补片置入术在半月线疝修补中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(3): 204-206.
[13]
克力木,阿力木江·麦斯依提,伊比提哈尔, 等. 腹腔镜膈疝修补术的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2015, 14(10): 832-834.
[14]
Canton SA, Merigliano S, Pasquali C. Prosthetic mesh "slim-cigarette like" for laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: a new technique without transabdominal fixation sutures[J]. Updates Surg, 2016, 68(2): 199-203.
[15]
Chan SB. Transfascial suture fixation technique in laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2020, 13(2): 246-249.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?